The relationship between objective physical activity and change in cognitive function

Kelsey R. Sewell, Stephanie R. Rainey-Smith, Jeremiah Peiffer, Hamid R. Sohrabi, Kevin Taddei, David Ames, Paul Maruff, Colin L. Masters, Christopher C. Rowe, Ralph N. Martins, Kirk I. Erickson, Belinda M. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The current study investigated the association between objectively measured physical activity and cognition in older adults over approximately 8 years. Methods: We utilized data from 199 cognitively unimpaired individuals from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study, aged ≥60. Actigraphy was used to measure physical activity (intensity, total activity, and energy expenditure) at baseline. Cognition was assessed using a comprehensive cognitive battery every 18-months. Results: Higher baseline energy expenditure predicted better episodic recall memory and global cognition over the follow-up period (p = 0.031; p = 0.047, respectively). Those with higher physical activity intensity and greater total activity also had better global cognition over time (both p = 0.005). Finally, higher total physical activity predicted improved episodic recall memory over time (p = 0.022). Discussion: These results suggest that physical activity can preserve cognition and that activity intensity may play an important role in this association. Highlights: Greater total physical activity predicts preserved episodic memory and global cognition. Moderate intensity physical activity (>3.7 metabolic equivalents of task [MET]) predicts preserved global cognition. Expending > 373 kilocalories per day may benefit episodic memory and global cognition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2984-2993
Number of pages10
JournalAlzheimer's and Dementia
Volume19
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The relationship between objective physical activity and change in cognitive function'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this