The phantom national? Assembling national teaching standards in Australia’s federal system

Glenn C. Savage, Steven Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

In this paper, we use the development of the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) as an illustrative case to examine how national schooling reforms are assembled in Australia’s federal system. Drawing upon an emerging body of research on ‘policy assemblage’ within the fields of policy sociology, anthropology and critical geography, we focus on interactions between three dominant ‘component parts’ in the development of the APST: the Australian federal government; New South Wales state government agencies; and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. While policies like the APST claim to be national in form and scope, our analysis suggests ‘the national’ is much more disjunctive and nebulous, constituted by a heterogeneous and emergent assemblage of policy ideas, practices, actors and organisations, which often reflect transnational traits and impulses. We thus see national reforms such as the APST as having a phantom-like nature, which poses challenges for researchers seeking to understand the making of national policies in federal systems.

LanguageEnglish
Pages118-142
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Education Policy
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Teaching
teacher
reform
government agency
OECD
Federal Government
anthropology
sociology
geography
interaction

Cite this

@article{05ef438579d6496e82aeeb3584878fe2,
title = "The phantom national? Assembling national teaching standards in Australia’s federal system",
abstract = "In this paper, we use the development of the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) as an illustrative case to examine how national schooling reforms are assembled in Australia’s federal system. Drawing upon an emerging body of research on ‘policy assemblage’ within the fields of policy sociology, anthropology and critical geography, we focus on interactions between three dominant ‘component parts’ in the development of the APST: the Australian federal government; New South Wales state government agencies; and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. While policies like the APST claim to be national in form and scope, our analysis suggests ‘the national’ is much more disjunctive and nebulous, constituted by a heterogeneous and emergent assemblage of policy ideas, practices, actors and organisations, which often reflect transnational traits and impulses. We thus see national reforms such as the APST as having a phantom-like nature, which poses challenges for researchers seeking to understand the making of national policies in federal systems.",
keywords = "Actors institutions, sociology",
author = "Savage, {Glenn C.} and Steven Lewis",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/02680939.2017.1325518",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "118--142",
journal = "Journal of Education Policy",
issn = "0268-0939",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

The phantom national? Assembling national teaching standards in Australia’s federal system. / Savage, Glenn C.; Lewis, Steven.

In: Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 33, No. 1, 02.01.2018, p. 118-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The phantom national? Assembling national teaching standards in Australia’s federal system

AU - Savage,Glenn C.

AU - Lewis,Steven

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - In this paper, we use the development of the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) as an illustrative case to examine how national schooling reforms are assembled in Australia’s federal system. Drawing upon an emerging body of research on ‘policy assemblage’ within the fields of policy sociology, anthropology and critical geography, we focus on interactions between three dominant ‘component parts’ in the development of the APST: the Australian federal government; New South Wales state government agencies; and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. While policies like the APST claim to be national in form and scope, our analysis suggests ‘the national’ is much more disjunctive and nebulous, constituted by a heterogeneous and emergent assemblage of policy ideas, practices, actors and organisations, which often reflect transnational traits and impulses. We thus see national reforms such as the APST as having a phantom-like nature, which poses challenges for researchers seeking to understand the making of national policies in federal systems.

AB - In this paper, we use the development of the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (APST) as an illustrative case to examine how national schooling reforms are assembled in Australia’s federal system. Drawing upon an emerging body of research on ‘policy assemblage’ within the fields of policy sociology, anthropology and critical geography, we focus on interactions between three dominant ‘component parts’ in the development of the APST: the Australian federal government; New South Wales state government agencies; and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. While policies like the APST claim to be national in form and scope, our analysis suggests ‘the national’ is much more disjunctive and nebulous, constituted by a heterogeneous and emergent assemblage of policy ideas, practices, actors and organisations, which often reflect transnational traits and impulses. We thus see national reforms such as the APST as having a phantom-like nature, which poses challenges for researchers seeking to understand the making of national policies in federal systems.

KW - Actors institutions

KW - sociology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019110574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02680939.2017.1325518

DO - 10.1080/02680939.2017.1325518

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 118

EP - 142

JO - Journal of Education Policy

T2 - Journal of Education Policy

JF - Journal of Education Policy

SN - 0268-0939

IS - 1

ER -