The need for a formalised system of Quality Control for environmental policy-science

Piers Larcombe, Peter Ridd

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Research science used to inform public policy decisions, herein defined as “Policy-Science” is rarely subjected to rigorous checking, testing and replication. Studies of biomedical and other sciences indicate that a considerable fraction of published peer-reviewed scientific literature, perhaps half, has significant flaws. To demonstrate the potential failings of the present approaches to scientific Quality Control (QC), we describe examples of science associated with perceived threats to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia. There appears a serious risk of efforts to improve the health of the GBR being directed inefficiently and/or away from the more serious threats. We suggest the need for a new organisation to undertake quality reviews and audits of important scientific results that underpin government spending decisions on the environment. Logically, such a body could also examine policy science in other key areas where governments rely heavily upon scientific results, such as education, health and criminology.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)449-461
    Number of pages13
    JournalMarine Pollution Bulletin
    Volume126
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

    Fingerprint

    Reefs
    environmental policy
    Great Barrier Reef
    quality control
    Quality control
    Health
    health education
    audits
    public policy
    peers
    barrier reef
    Education
    Defects
    Testing
    testing
    science
    need
    policy
    criminology

    Cite this

    @article{36c03e654d88480298d029605b1f22e1,
    title = "The need for a formalised system of Quality Control for environmental policy-science",
    abstract = "Research science used to inform public policy decisions, herein defined as “Policy-Science” is rarely subjected to rigorous checking, testing and replication. Studies of biomedical and other sciences indicate that a considerable fraction of published peer-reviewed scientific literature, perhaps half, has significant flaws. To demonstrate the potential failings of the present approaches to scientific Quality Control (QC), we describe examples of science associated with perceived threats to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia. There appears a serious risk of efforts to improve the health of the GBR being directed inefficiently and/or away from the more serious threats. We suggest the need for a new organisation to undertake quality reviews and audits of important scientific results that underpin government spending decisions on the environment. Logically, such a body could also examine policy science in other key areas where governments rely heavily upon scientific results, such as education, health and criminology.",
    keywords = "Environmental science, Great Barrier Reef, Policy, Quality",
    author = "Piers Larcombe and Peter Ridd",
    year = "2018",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.038",
    language = "English",
    volume = "126",
    pages = "449--461",
    journal = "Marine Pollution Bulletin",
    issn = "0025-326X",
    publisher = "Pergamon",

    }

    The need for a formalised system of Quality Control for environmental policy-science. / Larcombe, Piers; Ridd, Peter.

    In: Marine Pollution Bulletin, Vol. 126, 01.01.2018, p. 449-461.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The need for a formalised system of Quality Control for environmental policy-science

    AU - Larcombe, Piers

    AU - Ridd, Peter

    PY - 2018/1/1

    Y1 - 2018/1/1

    N2 - Research science used to inform public policy decisions, herein defined as “Policy-Science” is rarely subjected to rigorous checking, testing and replication. Studies of biomedical and other sciences indicate that a considerable fraction of published peer-reviewed scientific literature, perhaps half, has significant flaws. To demonstrate the potential failings of the present approaches to scientific Quality Control (QC), we describe examples of science associated with perceived threats to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia. There appears a serious risk of efforts to improve the health of the GBR being directed inefficiently and/or away from the more serious threats. We suggest the need for a new organisation to undertake quality reviews and audits of important scientific results that underpin government spending decisions on the environment. Logically, such a body could also examine policy science in other key areas where governments rely heavily upon scientific results, such as education, health and criminology.

    AB - Research science used to inform public policy decisions, herein defined as “Policy-Science” is rarely subjected to rigorous checking, testing and replication. Studies of biomedical and other sciences indicate that a considerable fraction of published peer-reviewed scientific literature, perhaps half, has significant flaws. To demonstrate the potential failings of the present approaches to scientific Quality Control (QC), we describe examples of science associated with perceived threats to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia. There appears a serious risk of efforts to improve the health of the GBR being directed inefficiently and/or away from the more serious threats. We suggest the need for a new organisation to undertake quality reviews and audits of important scientific results that underpin government spending decisions on the environment. Logically, such a body could also examine policy science in other key areas where governments rely heavily upon scientific results, such as education, health and criminology.

    KW - Environmental science

    KW - Great Barrier Reef

    KW - Policy

    KW - Quality

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036462903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.038

    DO - 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.038

    M3 - Article

    VL - 126

    SP - 449

    EP - 461

    JO - Marine Pollution Bulletin

    JF - Marine Pollution Bulletin

    SN - 0025-326X

    ER -