TY - JOUR
T1 - The Multilevel Structure of Daily Emotion-Regulation-Strategy Use
T2 - An Examination of Within- and Between-Person Associations in Naturalistic Settings
AU - McMahon, Tierney P.
AU - Naragon-Gainey, Kristin
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Existing structural analyses of emotion-regulation (ER) strategies have relied on retrospective, dispositional assessments, ignoring the within-person structure (i.e., intraindividual strategy groupings based on momentary covariances) and variability in strategy use across time and contexts. We conducted multilevel exploratory factor analyses on self-reported daily use of 11 strategies (i.e., acceptance, behavioral avoidance, distraction, experiential avoidance, expressive suppression, procrastination, reappraisal, reflection, rumination, savoring, social support) in clinical (N = 129) and student (N = 109) samples with intensive longitudinal designs. At the between-person level, two factors—Engagement and Avoidance—emerged in both samples. A different structure was found at the within-person level, with four factors in the student sample (i.e., Attentional Shift, Acceptance, Avoidance, Emotional Expression) and three in the clinical sample (i.e., Attentional Shift, Avoidance, Emotional Expression). The validity of these factors was examined via their associations with daily internalizing symptoms and affect. Implications for naturalistic ER strategy use and clinical assessment/intervention are discussed.
AB - Existing structural analyses of emotion-regulation (ER) strategies have relied on retrospective, dispositional assessments, ignoring the within-person structure (i.e., intraindividual strategy groupings based on momentary covariances) and variability in strategy use across time and contexts. We conducted multilevel exploratory factor analyses on self-reported daily use of 11 strategies (i.e., acceptance, behavioral avoidance, distraction, experiential avoidance, expressive suppression, procrastination, reappraisal, reflection, rumination, savoring, social support) in clinical (N = 129) and student (N = 109) samples with intensive longitudinal designs. At the between-person level, two factors—Engagement and Avoidance—emerged in both samples. A different structure was found at the within-person level, with four factors in the student sample (i.e., Attentional Shift, Acceptance, Avoidance, Emotional Expression) and three in the clinical sample (i.e., Attentional Shift, Avoidance, Emotional Expression). The validity of these factors was examined via their associations with daily internalizing symptoms and affect. Implications for naturalistic ER strategy use and clinical assessment/intervention are discussed.
KW - emotion regulation strategies
KW - intensive longitudinal design
KW - internalizing symptoms
KW - negative affect
KW - open data
KW - positive affect
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058682863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2167702618807408
DO - 10.1177/2167702618807408
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85058682863
SN - 2167-7026
VL - 7
SP - 321
EP - 339
JO - Clinical Psychological Science
JF - Clinical Psychological Science
IS - 2
ER -