The Mrs Freer case revisited: marriage, morality and the state in interwar Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In October 1936, Australia’s Minister for the Interior, Thomas Paterson, ordered customs officials to bar a married, white British woman travelling with a married army officer from entering Australia. Mabel Freer’s exclusion sparked a media sensation and captured public attention for months. In re-examining the Freer case, this article focuses on questions of morality, respectability and marriage, and how these intertwined with racial identity formation in interwar Australia. Freer’s exclusion struck a chord with the general public, and with women in particular, who condemned Paterson’s action and demanded Freer’s admission. However, while this mobilisation against government overreach successfully challenged the sexual double standard and patriarchal assumptions about marriage and women’s respectability, it simultaneously reinforced the racist logic underpinning the White Australia policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437-458
JournalHistory Australia
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Marriage
Morality
Exclusion
Respectability
Government
Army
Racist
General Public
Sexual
Identity Formation
Racial Identity
Logic
Mobilization
Admission

Cite this

@article{c0fe856f9cfa42d4901c8ea79a05a37a,
title = "The Mrs Freer case revisited: marriage, morality and the state in interwar Australia",
abstract = "In October 1936, Australia’s Minister for the Interior, Thomas Paterson, ordered customs officials to bar a married, white British woman travelling with a married army officer from entering Australia. Mabel Freer’s exclusion sparked a media sensation and captured public attention for months. In re-examining the Freer case, this article focuses on questions of morality, respectability and marriage, and how these intertwined with racial identity formation in interwar Australia. Freer’s exclusion struck a chord with the general public, and with women in particular, who condemned Paterson’s action and demanded Freer’s admission. However, while this mobilisation against government overreach successfully challenged the sexual double standard and patriarchal assumptions about marriage and women’s respectability, it simultaneously reinforced the racist logic underpinning the White Australia policy.",
keywords = "1930s, Australia, gender, Mabel Freer, marriage, Morality, race, respectability, Thomas Paterson",
author = "Jeremy Martens",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1080/14490854.2019.1636673",
language = "English",
pages = "437--458",
journal = "History Australia",
issn = "1449-0854",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

The Mrs Freer case revisited : marriage, morality and the state in interwar Australia. / Martens, Jeremy.

In: History Australia, 13.08.2019, p. 437-458.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Mrs Freer case revisited

T2 - marriage, morality and the state in interwar Australia

AU - Martens, Jeremy

PY - 2019/8/13

Y1 - 2019/8/13

N2 - In October 1936, Australia’s Minister for the Interior, Thomas Paterson, ordered customs officials to bar a married, white British woman travelling with a married army officer from entering Australia. Mabel Freer’s exclusion sparked a media sensation and captured public attention for months. In re-examining the Freer case, this article focuses on questions of morality, respectability and marriage, and how these intertwined with racial identity formation in interwar Australia. Freer’s exclusion struck a chord with the general public, and with women in particular, who condemned Paterson’s action and demanded Freer’s admission. However, while this mobilisation against government overreach successfully challenged the sexual double standard and patriarchal assumptions about marriage and women’s respectability, it simultaneously reinforced the racist logic underpinning the White Australia policy.

AB - In October 1936, Australia’s Minister for the Interior, Thomas Paterson, ordered customs officials to bar a married, white British woman travelling with a married army officer from entering Australia. Mabel Freer’s exclusion sparked a media sensation and captured public attention for months. In re-examining the Freer case, this article focuses on questions of morality, respectability and marriage, and how these intertwined with racial identity formation in interwar Australia. Freer’s exclusion struck a chord with the general public, and with women in particular, who condemned Paterson’s action and demanded Freer’s admission. However, while this mobilisation against government overreach successfully challenged the sexual double standard and patriarchal assumptions about marriage and women’s respectability, it simultaneously reinforced the racist logic underpinning the White Australia policy.

KW - 1930s

KW - Australia

KW - gender

KW - Mabel Freer

KW - marriage

KW - Morality

KW - race

KW - respectability

KW - Thomas Paterson

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071925996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14490854.2019.1636673

DO - 10.1080/14490854.2019.1636673

M3 - Article

SP - 437

EP - 458

JO - History Australia

JF - History Australia

SN - 1449-0854

ER -