The Mo deposits of Northeast China: A powerful indicator of tectonic settings and associated evolutionary trends

Yan Jing Chen, Cheng Zhang, Pin Wang, Franco Pirajno, Nuo Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Northeast (NE) China lies in the eastern sector of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) that connects with the Circum-Pacific Orogenic Belt in the east, and accommodates multistage magmatism, crustal growth and mineralization. In this region 69 Mo-only or Mo-dominated and 9 Cu-Mo deposits have been discovered, including 65 deposits ranking medium-size (> 10 Kt Mo metal) or larger in tonnage and containing a total resource of 10.5 Mt Mo metal. Six giant and seventeen large deposits have total reserves of 6.7 and 3.1 Mt Mo, respectively. These deposits occur in the areas surrounding the Songliao Basin, including the northern margin of the North China Craton, the Great Hingan Range and the Ji-Hei Fold Belt, and have been formed during Paleozoic and Mesozoic tectono-magmatic events. All the Mo-only or Mo-dominated deposits were formed in the Mesozoic, postdating the closure of the Paleo-Asia Ocean, and in a series of pulses around 250–200 Ma, 200–160 Ma, 160–130 and <130 Ma (130–100 Ma), suggesting that the Paleozoic crust, compared with the Mesozoic crust, was less sialic and unfavorable for Mo mineralization. This is supported by the variation of Re contents in molybdenites from the deposits, i.e., increasing with the Cu/Mo ratios and the ore-forming ages. Mineralization was generally associated with granitic rocks mainly of crust-sourced and high-K calc-alkaline to shoshonite series. The majority of the deposits are porphyry (including breccia pipes) type, followed by the skarn and quartz vein types. The porphyry Mo deposits can be further subdivided into three subtypes, i.e., collision- or Dabie-, rift- or Climax-, and subduction- or Endako-types. The Mo deposits aged 250–200-Ma and 200–160-Ma belong to the collision-type and have been formed in syn- to post-collisional tectonic setting. The 160–130-Ma Mo mineralization mainly occurs in the Great Hingan Range and northern margin of the North China Craton, and includes Endako- and Climax-types of porphyry Mo systems, which resulted from southward subduction of the Mongol-Okhotsk oceanic plate. The 130–100-Ma deposits belong to the Endako-type and are only located in the eastern Ji-Hei Fold Belt, which must be related to the westward subduction of the Paleo-Pacific oceanic plate. Therefore, as shown by the porphyry Mo deposits in NE China, these mineral systems are a powerful indicator of tectonic settings and associated evolutionary trends.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)602-640
Number of pages39
JournalOre Geology Reviews
Volume81
Issue numberPart 2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Tectonics
porphyry
tectonic setting
Deposits
mineralization
subduction
climax
fold belt
crust
orogenic belt
craton
Paleozoic
collision
shoshonite
diatreme
metal
skarn
quartz vein
ranking
magmatism

Cite this

Chen, Yan Jing ; Zhang, Cheng ; Wang, Pin ; Pirajno, Franco ; Li, Nuo. / The Mo deposits of Northeast China : A powerful indicator of tectonic settings and associated evolutionary trends. In: Ore Geology Reviews. 2017 ; Vol. 81, No. Part 2. pp. 602-640.
@article{87d7e55519ce4924be47fd97c1c87d88,
title = "The Mo deposits of Northeast China: A powerful indicator of tectonic settings and associated evolutionary trends",
abstract = "Northeast (NE) China lies in the eastern sector of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) that connects with the Circum-Pacific Orogenic Belt in the east, and accommodates multistage magmatism, crustal growth and mineralization. In this region 69 Mo-only or Mo-dominated and 9 Cu-Mo deposits have been discovered, including 65 deposits ranking medium-size (> 10 Kt Mo metal) or larger in tonnage and containing a total resource of 10.5 Mt Mo metal. Six giant and seventeen large deposits have total reserves of 6.7 and 3.1 Mt Mo, respectively. These deposits occur in the areas surrounding the Songliao Basin, including the northern margin of the North China Craton, the Great Hingan Range and the Ji-Hei Fold Belt, and have been formed during Paleozoic and Mesozoic tectono-magmatic events. All the Mo-only or Mo-dominated deposits were formed in the Mesozoic, postdating the closure of the Paleo-Asia Ocean, and in a series of pulses around 250–200 Ma, 200–160 Ma, 160–130 and <130 Ma (130–100 Ma), suggesting that the Paleozoic crust, compared with the Mesozoic crust, was less sialic and unfavorable for Mo mineralization. This is supported by the variation of Re contents in molybdenites from the deposits, i.e., increasing with the Cu/Mo ratios and the ore-forming ages. Mineralization was generally associated with granitic rocks mainly of crust-sourced and high-K calc-alkaline to shoshonite series. The majority of the deposits are porphyry (including breccia pipes) type, followed by the skarn and quartz vein types. The porphyry Mo deposits can be further subdivided into three subtypes, i.e., collision- or Dabie-, rift- or Climax-, and subduction- or Endako-types. The Mo deposits aged 250–200-Ma and 200–160-Ma belong to the collision-type and have been formed in syn- to post-collisional tectonic setting. The 160–130-Ma Mo mineralization mainly occurs in the Great Hingan Range and northern margin of the North China Craton, and includes Endako- and Climax-types of porphyry Mo systems, which resulted from southward subduction of the Mongol-Okhotsk oceanic plate. The 130–100-Ma deposits belong to the Endako-type and are only located in the eastern Ji-Hei Fold Belt, which must be related to the westward subduction of the Paleo-Pacific oceanic plate. Therefore, as shown by the porphyry Mo deposits in NE China, these mineral systems are a powerful indicator of tectonic settings and associated evolutionary trends.",
keywords = "Isotope age, Mesozoic, Northeast China, Ore geology, Porphyry Mo deposit, Tectonic setting",
author = "Chen, {Yan Jing} and Cheng Zhang and Pin Wang and Franco Pirajno and Nuo Li",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.04.017",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "602--640",
journal = "Ore Geology Reviews",
issn = "0169-1368",
publisher = "Pergamon",
number = "Part 2",

}

The Mo deposits of Northeast China : A powerful indicator of tectonic settings and associated evolutionary trends. / Chen, Yan Jing; Zhang, Cheng; Wang, Pin; Pirajno, Franco; Li, Nuo.

In: Ore Geology Reviews, Vol. 81, No. Part 2, 01.03.2017, p. 602-640.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Mo deposits of Northeast China

T2 - A powerful indicator of tectonic settings and associated evolutionary trends

AU - Chen, Yan Jing

AU - Zhang, Cheng

AU - Wang, Pin

AU - Pirajno, Franco

AU - Li, Nuo

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Northeast (NE) China lies in the eastern sector of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) that connects with the Circum-Pacific Orogenic Belt in the east, and accommodates multistage magmatism, crustal growth and mineralization. In this region 69 Mo-only or Mo-dominated and 9 Cu-Mo deposits have been discovered, including 65 deposits ranking medium-size (> 10 Kt Mo metal) or larger in tonnage and containing a total resource of 10.5 Mt Mo metal. Six giant and seventeen large deposits have total reserves of 6.7 and 3.1 Mt Mo, respectively. These deposits occur in the areas surrounding the Songliao Basin, including the northern margin of the North China Craton, the Great Hingan Range and the Ji-Hei Fold Belt, and have been formed during Paleozoic and Mesozoic tectono-magmatic events. All the Mo-only or Mo-dominated deposits were formed in the Mesozoic, postdating the closure of the Paleo-Asia Ocean, and in a series of pulses around 250–200 Ma, 200–160 Ma, 160–130 and <130 Ma (130–100 Ma), suggesting that the Paleozoic crust, compared with the Mesozoic crust, was less sialic and unfavorable for Mo mineralization. This is supported by the variation of Re contents in molybdenites from the deposits, i.e., increasing with the Cu/Mo ratios and the ore-forming ages. Mineralization was generally associated with granitic rocks mainly of crust-sourced and high-K calc-alkaline to shoshonite series. The majority of the deposits are porphyry (including breccia pipes) type, followed by the skarn and quartz vein types. The porphyry Mo deposits can be further subdivided into three subtypes, i.e., collision- or Dabie-, rift- or Climax-, and subduction- or Endako-types. The Mo deposits aged 250–200-Ma and 200–160-Ma belong to the collision-type and have been formed in syn- to post-collisional tectonic setting. The 160–130-Ma Mo mineralization mainly occurs in the Great Hingan Range and northern margin of the North China Craton, and includes Endako- and Climax-types of porphyry Mo systems, which resulted from southward subduction of the Mongol-Okhotsk oceanic plate. The 130–100-Ma deposits belong to the Endako-type and are only located in the eastern Ji-Hei Fold Belt, which must be related to the westward subduction of the Paleo-Pacific oceanic plate. Therefore, as shown by the porphyry Mo deposits in NE China, these mineral systems are a powerful indicator of tectonic settings and associated evolutionary trends.

AB - Northeast (NE) China lies in the eastern sector of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) that connects with the Circum-Pacific Orogenic Belt in the east, and accommodates multistage magmatism, crustal growth and mineralization. In this region 69 Mo-only or Mo-dominated and 9 Cu-Mo deposits have been discovered, including 65 deposits ranking medium-size (> 10 Kt Mo metal) or larger in tonnage and containing a total resource of 10.5 Mt Mo metal. Six giant and seventeen large deposits have total reserves of 6.7 and 3.1 Mt Mo, respectively. These deposits occur in the areas surrounding the Songliao Basin, including the northern margin of the North China Craton, the Great Hingan Range and the Ji-Hei Fold Belt, and have been formed during Paleozoic and Mesozoic tectono-magmatic events. All the Mo-only or Mo-dominated deposits were formed in the Mesozoic, postdating the closure of the Paleo-Asia Ocean, and in a series of pulses around 250–200 Ma, 200–160 Ma, 160–130 and <130 Ma (130–100 Ma), suggesting that the Paleozoic crust, compared with the Mesozoic crust, was less sialic and unfavorable for Mo mineralization. This is supported by the variation of Re contents in molybdenites from the deposits, i.e., increasing with the Cu/Mo ratios and the ore-forming ages. Mineralization was generally associated with granitic rocks mainly of crust-sourced and high-K calc-alkaline to shoshonite series. The majority of the deposits are porphyry (including breccia pipes) type, followed by the skarn and quartz vein types. The porphyry Mo deposits can be further subdivided into three subtypes, i.e., collision- or Dabie-, rift- or Climax-, and subduction- or Endako-types. The Mo deposits aged 250–200-Ma and 200–160-Ma belong to the collision-type and have been formed in syn- to post-collisional tectonic setting. The 160–130-Ma Mo mineralization mainly occurs in the Great Hingan Range and northern margin of the North China Craton, and includes Endako- and Climax-types of porphyry Mo systems, which resulted from southward subduction of the Mongol-Okhotsk oceanic plate. The 130–100-Ma deposits belong to the Endako-type and are only located in the eastern Ji-Hei Fold Belt, which must be related to the westward subduction of the Paleo-Pacific oceanic plate. Therefore, as shown by the porphyry Mo deposits in NE China, these mineral systems are a powerful indicator of tectonic settings and associated evolutionary trends.

KW - Isotope age

KW - Mesozoic

KW - Northeast China

KW - Ore geology

KW - Porphyry Mo deposit

KW - Tectonic setting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965107677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.04.017

DO - 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.04.017

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 602

EP - 640

JO - Ore Geology Reviews

JF - Ore Geology Reviews

SN - 0169-1368

IS - Part 2

ER -