The mask or the needle? Which induction should we go for?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the current evidence available to guide anaesthetists along the decision-making process between inhalational and intravenous anaesthesia when caring for paediatric patients. RECENT FINDINGS: A recent large randomized controlled trial in children with risk factors demonstrated a significant benefit of intravenous induction over inhalational induction with regards to respiratory adverse events. This difference is particularly pronounced in those with respiratory symptoms. SUMMARY: For children scheduled for elective surgery, intravenous induction has significant advantages with regards to reduced respiratory adverse events and for less postoperative behavioural disturbances, it may be associated with more anxiety at the time of induction. The anaesthetist in charge of the patient needs to weigh up the balance between the clinical risk of respiratory adverse events, the 'veins on offer', the level of anxiety and previous experiences of the child and his/her parents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-383
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Anaesthesiology
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Masks
Needles
Anxiety
Intravenous Anesthesia
Veins
Decision Making
Randomized Controlled Trials
Parents
Pediatrics
Anesthetists

Cite this

@article{cdf6833acc974fb9af1a5b7ad6909e84,
title = "The mask or the needle? Which induction should we go for?",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the current evidence available to guide anaesthetists along the decision-making process between inhalational and intravenous anaesthesia when caring for paediatric patients. RECENT FINDINGS: A recent large randomized controlled trial in children with risk factors demonstrated a significant benefit of intravenous induction over inhalational induction with regards to respiratory adverse events. This difference is particularly pronounced in those with respiratory symptoms. SUMMARY: For children scheduled for elective surgery, intravenous induction has significant advantages with regards to reduced respiratory adverse events and for less postoperative behavioural disturbances, it may be associated with more anxiety at the time of induction. The anaesthetist in charge of the patient needs to weigh up the balance between the clinical risk of respiratory adverse events, the 'veins on offer', the level of anxiety and previous experiences of the child and his/her parents.",
author = "David Sommerfield and {von Ungern-Sternberg}, {Britta S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACO.0000000000000729",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "377--383",
journal = "Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology",
issn = "0952-7907",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

The mask or the needle? Which induction should we go for? / Sommerfield, David; von Ungern-Sternberg, Britta S.

In: Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.06.2019, p. 377-383.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The mask or the needle? Which induction should we go for?

AU - Sommerfield, David

AU - von Ungern-Sternberg, Britta S.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the current evidence available to guide anaesthetists along the decision-making process between inhalational and intravenous anaesthesia when caring for paediatric patients. RECENT FINDINGS: A recent large randomized controlled trial in children with risk factors demonstrated a significant benefit of intravenous induction over inhalational induction with regards to respiratory adverse events. This difference is particularly pronounced in those with respiratory symptoms. SUMMARY: For children scheduled for elective surgery, intravenous induction has significant advantages with regards to reduced respiratory adverse events and for less postoperative behavioural disturbances, it may be associated with more anxiety at the time of induction. The anaesthetist in charge of the patient needs to weigh up the balance between the clinical risk of respiratory adverse events, the 'veins on offer', the level of anxiety and previous experiences of the child and his/her parents.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the current evidence available to guide anaesthetists along the decision-making process between inhalational and intravenous anaesthesia when caring for paediatric patients. RECENT FINDINGS: A recent large randomized controlled trial in children with risk factors demonstrated a significant benefit of intravenous induction over inhalational induction with regards to respiratory adverse events. This difference is particularly pronounced in those with respiratory symptoms. SUMMARY: For children scheduled for elective surgery, intravenous induction has significant advantages with regards to reduced respiratory adverse events and for less postoperative behavioural disturbances, it may be associated with more anxiety at the time of induction. The anaesthetist in charge of the patient needs to weigh up the balance between the clinical risk of respiratory adverse events, the 'veins on offer', the level of anxiety and previous experiences of the child and his/her parents.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065511560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000729

DO - 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000729

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 377

EP - 383

JO - Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

JF - Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

SN - 0952-7907

IS - 3

ER -