The Intimate Link Between Income Levels and Life Expectancy: Global Evidence from 213 Years

Michael Jetter, Sabine Laudage, David Stadelmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: What is the main driver of life expectancy across societies and over time? This study aims to document a systematic and quantitatively sizeable relationship between income levels and life expectancy. Method: A panel data set of 197 countries over 213 years is analyzed with different regression methods. Robustness tests are provided. Results: By itself, GDP per capita explains more than 64 percent of the variation in life expectancy. The Preston curve prevails even when accounting for country- and time-fixed effects, country-specific time trends, and alternative explanatory variables such as health-care expenditure, malaria prevalence, or political institutions. If anything, this link has become stronger over recent decades when data quality has improved. Results from instrumental variable estimations suggest this finding to be largely unaffected by reverse causality. Quantile regression results suggest the relationship between income and life expectancy to be persistent across different levels of life expectancy. Conclusion: Income matters for life expectancy. If policymakers want to prolong people's lives, economic growth appears to be the predominant medicine.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1387-1403
Number of pages17
JournalSocial Science Quarterly
Volume100
Issue number4
Early online date23 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Fingerprint

life expectancy
income
evidence
regression
data quality
political institution
causality
expenditures
economic growth
driver
health care
trend
society
time

Cite this

Jetter, Michael ; Laudage, Sabine ; Stadelmann, David. / The Intimate Link Between Income Levels and Life Expectancy : Global Evidence from 213 Years. In: Social Science Quarterly. 2019 ; Vol. 100, No. 4. pp. 1387-1403.
@article{7993208e261443d7bab6b33362aae77f,
title = "The Intimate Link Between Income Levels and Life Expectancy: Global Evidence from 213 Years",
abstract = "Objectives: What is the main driver of life expectancy across societies and over time? This study aims to document a systematic and quantitatively sizeable relationship between income levels and life expectancy. Method: A panel data set of 197 countries over 213 years is analyzed with different regression methods. Robustness tests are provided. Results: By itself, GDP per capita explains more than 64 percent of the variation in life expectancy. The Preston curve prevails even when accounting for country- and time-fixed effects, country-specific time trends, and alternative explanatory variables such as health-care expenditure, malaria prevalence, or political institutions. If anything, this link has become stronger over recent decades when data quality has improved. Results from instrumental variable estimations suggest this finding to be largely unaffected by reverse causality. Quantile regression results suggest the relationship between income and life expectancy to be persistent across different levels of life expectancy. Conclusion: Income matters for life expectancy. If policymakers want to prolong people's lives, economic growth appears to be the predominant medicine.",
author = "Michael Jetter and Sabine Laudage and David Stadelmann",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/ssqu.12638",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "1387--1403",
journal = "Social Science Quarterly",
issn = "0038-4941",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

The Intimate Link Between Income Levels and Life Expectancy : Global Evidence from 213 Years. / Jetter, Michael; Laudage, Sabine; Stadelmann, David.

In: Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 100, No. 4, 06.2019, p. 1387-1403.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Intimate Link Between Income Levels and Life Expectancy

T2 - Global Evidence from 213 Years

AU - Jetter, Michael

AU - Laudage, Sabine

AU - Stadelmann, David

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Objectives: What is the main driver of life expectancy across societies and over time? This study aims to document a systematic and quantitatively sizeable relationship between income levels and life expectancy. Method: A panel data set of 197 countries over 213 years is analyzed with different regression methods. Robustness tests are provided. Results: By itself, GDP per capita explains more than 64 percent of the variation in life expectancy. The Preston curve prevails even when accounting for country- and time-fixed effects, country-specific time trends, and alternative explanatory variables such as health-care expenditure, malaria prevalence, or political institutions. If anything, this link has become stronger over recent decades when data quality has improved. Results from instrumental variable estimations suggest this finding to be largely unaffected by reverse causality. Quantile regression results suggest the relationship between income and life expectancy to be persistent across different levels of life expectancy. Conclusion: Income matters for life expectancy. If policymakers want to prolong people's lives, economic growth appears to be the predominant medicine.

AB - Objectives: What is the main driver of life expectancy across societies and over time? This study aims to document a systematic and quantitatively sizeable relationship between income levels and life expectancy. Method: A panel data set of 197 countries over 213 years is analyzed with different regression methods. Robustness tests are provided. Results: By itself, GDP per capita explains more than 64 percent of the variation in life expectancy. The Preston curve prevails even when accounting for country- and time-fixed effects, country-specific time trends, and alternative explanatory variables such as health-care expenditure, malaria prevalence, or political institutions. If anything, this link has become stronger over recent decades when data quality has improved. Results from instrumental variable estimations suggest this finding to be largely unaffected by reverse causality. Quantile regression results suggest the relationship between income and life expectancy to be persistent across different levels of life expectancy. Conclusion: Income matters for life expectancy. If policymakers want to prolong people's lives, economic growth appears to be the predominant medicine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064650334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ssqu.12638

DO - 10.1111/ssqu.12638

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 1387

EP - 1403

JO - Social Science Quarterly

JF - Social Science Quarterly

SN - 0038-4941

IS - 4

ER -