The impact of voluntariness of apologies on victims’ responses in restorative justice: findings of a quantitative study

Alfred Allan, Justine de Mott, Isolde M. Larkins, Laura Turnbull, Tracey Warwick, Lacey Willett, Maria M. Allan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Apologies are ordered in law without certainty about whether or not recipients perceive ordered and voluntary apologies differently. This exploratory study investigates whether or not the voluntariness of apologies influences recipients’ perceptions of their sincerity, acceptance of apologies, willingness to forgive and intended retributive behaviour. We manipulated the voluntariness of apologies whilst considering offender (age, gender, ethnicity and prior wrongful behaviour) and offence (seriousness) characteristics in 3 studies (ns = 164, 121, 236). Participants adopting the role of a hypothetical victim received either a voluntary or an ordered apology. The voluntary apologies were found to have a significantly more positive impact than the ordered apologies on acceptance and perception of sincerity in all 3 studies and on forgiveness in 2 studies, but did not significantly change participants’ retributive behaviour in any study. Age was the only other variable found to make a significant difference, with younger offenders’ apologies being rated as sincerer.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)593-609
Number of pages17
JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of voluntariness of apologies on victims’ responses in restorative justice: findings of a quantitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this