The global union federations in international industrial relations: A critical review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)


© Australian Labour and Employment Relations Association (ALERA), SAGE Publications Ltd, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington DC In recent decades, trade unions have been challenged to develop new forms of representation, action and institutional engagement in response to the increasingly transnational character of production and service delivery. This has necessarily required a shift in focus beyond national boundaries, and thus beyond the traditional scale of industrial relations systems. Among the most important actors in these attempts to globalize industrial relations have been the global union federations (GUFs), which represent national sectoral federations in key industries. Over several decades, the GUFs have sought to engage with multinational corporations through various strategies including policy campaigns and the negotiation of Global Framework Agreements (GFAs) and have provided support for workers and their unions in different national settings, including emerging labour movements in the Global South. This article reviews the growing literature on transnational industrial relations, focusing on the historical development of the GUFs, their core repertoires of action and their impact on industrial relations practice both internationally and within national boundaries. In doing so, it identifies and assesses not only the opportunities for GUF interventions in international industrial relations, but also the many obstacles – including resource constraints and dependence on unions at other scales – that limit their reach and ability to achieve these strategic goals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)456-475
JournalJournal of Industrial Relations
Issue number3
Early online date24 Apr 2015
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'The global union federations in international industrial relations: A critical review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this