The evolution of Society for Ecological Restoration's principles and standards—counter-response to Gann et al.

Eric Higgs, Jim Harris, Stephen Murphy, Keith Bowers, Richard Hobbs, Willis Jenkins, Jeremy Kidwell, Nik Lopoukhine, Bethany Sollereder, Katie Suding, Allen Thompson, Steve Whisenant

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In response to our recent article (Higgs et al. 2018) in these pages, George Gann and his coauthors defended the Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) International Standards, clarified several points, and introduced some new perspectives. We offer this counter-response to address some of these perspectives. More than anything, our aims are in sharpening the field of restoration in a time of rapid scaling-up of interest and effort, and support further constructive dialogue going forward. Our perspective remains that there is an important distinction needed between “Standards” and “Principles” that is largely unheeded by Gann et al. (2018). We encourage SER to consider in future iterations of its senior policy document to lean on principles first, and then to issue advice on standards that meet the needs of diverse conditions and social, economic, and political realities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)431-433
Number of pages3
JournalRestoration Ecology
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Fingerprint

ecological restoration
socioeconomics
economics
restoration

Cite this

Higgs, Eric ; Harris, Jim ; Murphy, Stephen ; Bowers, Keith ; Hobbs, Richard ; Jenkins, Willis ; Kidwell, Jeremy ; Lopoukhine, Nik ; Sollereder, Bethany ; Suding, Katie ; Thompson, Allen ; Whisenant, Steve. / The evolution of Society for Ecological Restoration's principles and standards—counter-response to Gann et al. In: Restoration Ecology. 2018 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 431-433.
@article{88bd75be2bf74ba1bdfe12d5af726150,
title = "The evolution of Society for Ecological Restoration's principles and standards—counter-response to Gann et al.",
abstract = "In response to our recent article (Higgs et al. 2018) in these pages, George Gann and his coauthors defended the Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) International Standards, clarified several points, and introduced some new perspectives. We offer this counter-response to address some of these perspectives. More than anything, our aims are in sharpening the field of restoration in a time of rapid scaling-up of interest and effort, and support further constructive dialogue going forward. Our perspective remains that there is an important distinction needed between “Standards” and “Principles” that is largely unheeded by Gann et al. (2018). We encourage SER to consider in future iterations of its senior policy document to lean on principles first, and then to issue advice on standards that meet the needs of diverse conditions and social, economic, and political realities.",
keywords = "ecological restoration targets, global restoration policy, reference ecosystems, restoration principles, restoration standards",
author = "Eric Higgs and Jim Harris and Stephen Murphy and Keith Bowers and Richard Hobbs and Willis Jenkins and Jeremy Kidwell and Nik Lopoukhine and Bethany Sollereder and Katie Suding and Allen Thompson and Steve Whisenant",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/rec.12821",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "431--433",
journal = "Restoration Ecology",
issn = "1061-2971",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "3",

}

Higgs, E, Harris, J, Murphy, S, Bowers, K, Hobbs, R, Jenkins, W, Kidwell, J, Lopoukhine, N, Sollereder, B, Suding, K, Thompson, A & Whisenant, S 2018, 'The evolution of Society for Ecological Restoration's principles and standards—counter-response to Gann et al.' Restoration Ecology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 431-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12821

The evolution of Society for Ecological Restoration's principles and standards—counter-response to Gann et al. / Higgs, Eric; Harris, Jim; Murphy, Stephen; Bowers, Keith; Hobbs, Richard; Jenkins, Willis; Kidwell, Jeremy; Lopoukhine, Nik; Sollereder, Bethany; Suding, Katie; Thompson, Allen; Whisenant, Steve.

In: Restoration Ecology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 431-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evolution of Society for Ecological Restoration's principles and standards—counter-response to Gann et al.

AU - Higgs, Eric

AU - Harris, Jim

AU - Murphy, Stephen

AU - Bowers, Keith

AU - Hobbs, Richard

AU - Jenkins, Willis

AU - Kidwell, Jeremy

AU - Lopoukhine, Nik

AU - Sollereder, Bethany

AU - Suding, Katie

AU - Thompson, Allen

AU - Whisenant, Steve

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - In response to our recent article (Higgs et al. 2018) in these pages, George Gann and his coauthors defended the Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) International Standards, clarified several points, and introduced some new perspectives. We offer this counter-response to address some of these perspectives. More than anything, our aims are in sharpening the field of restoration in a time of rapid scaling-up of interest and effort, and support further constructive dialogue going forward. Our perspective remains that there is an important distinction needed between “Standards” and “Principles” that is largely unheeded by Gann et al. (2018). We encourage SER to consider in future iterations of its senior policy document to lean on principles first, and then to issue advice on standards that meet the needs of diverse conditions and social, economic, and political realities.

AB - In response to our recent article (Higgs et al. 2018) in these pages, George Gann and his coauthors defended the Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) International Standards, clarified several points, and introduced some new perspectives. We offer this counter-response to address some of these perspectives. More than anything, our aims are in sharpening the field of restoration in a time of rapid scaling-up of interest and effort, and support further constructive dialogue going forward. Our perspective remains that there is an important distinction needed between “Standards” and “Principles” that is largely unheeded by Gann et al. (2018). We encourage SER to consider in future iterations of its senior policy document to lean on principles first, and then to issue advice on standards that meet the needs of diverse conditions and social, economic, and political realities.

KW - ecological restoration targets

KW - global restoration policy

KW - reference ecosystems

KW - restoration principles

KW - restoration standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048113878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/rec.12821

DO - 10.1111/rec.12821

M3 - Letter

VL - 26

SP - 431

EP - 433

JO - Restoration Ecology

JF - Restoration Ecology

SN - 1061-2971

IS - 3

ER -