The evolution of female genitalia

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Female genitalia have been largely neglected in studies of genital evolution, perhaps due to the long-standing belief that they are relatively invariable and therefore taxonomically and evolutionarily uninformative in comparison with male genitalia. Contemporary studies of genital evolution have begun to dispute this view, and to demonstrate that female genitalia can be highly diverse and covary with the genitalia of males. Here, we examine evidence for three mechanisms of genital evolution in females: species isolating 'lock-and-key' evolution, cryptic female choice and sexual conflict. Lock-and-key genital evolution has been thought to be relatively unimportant; however, we present cases that show how species isolation may well play a role in the evolution of female genitalia. Much support for female genital evolution via sexual conflict comes from studies of both invertebrate and vertebrate species; however, the effects of sexual conflict can be difficult to distinguish from models of cryptic female choice that focus on putative benefits of choice for females. We offer potential solutions to alleviate this issue. Finally, we offer directions for future studies in order to expand and refine our knowledge surrounding female genital evolution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)882-889
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume32
Issue number9
Early online date26 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2019

Cite this

@article{d4285b71a88744608cd751460f9b64c6,
title = "The evolution of female genitalia",
abstract = "Female genitalia have been largely neglected in studies of genital evolution, perhaps due to the long-standing belief that they are relatively invariable and therefore taxonomically and evolutionarily uninformative in comparison with male genitalia. Contemporary studies of genital evolution have begun to dispute this view, and to demonstrate that female genitalia can be highly diverse and covary with the genitalia of males. Here, we examine evidence for three mechanisms of genital evolution in females: species isolating 'lock-and-key' evolution, cryptic female choice and sexual conflict. Lock-and-key genital evolution has been thought to be relatively unimportant; however, we present cases that show how species isolation may well play a role in the evolution of female genitalia. Much support for female genital evolution via sexual conflict comes from studies of both invertebrate and vertebrate species; however, the effects of sexual conflict can be difficult to distinguish from models of cryptic female choice that focus on putative benefits of choice for females. We offer potential solutions to alleviate this issue. Finally, we offer directions for future studies in order to expand and refine our knowledge surrounding female genital evolution.",
keywords = "coevolution, female choice, genital evolution, lock-and-key, micro-computed tomography, pleiotropy, reproductive character displacement, sexual conflict, sexual selection, LOCK-AND-KEY, MECHANICAL REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION, SEXUAL CONFLICT, CORRELATED EVOLUTION, WATER STRIDER, RIVAL SPERM, ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION, CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT, FUNCTIONAL-MORPHOLOGY, COPULATORY COURTSHIP",
author = "Sloan, {Nadia S.} and Simmons, {Leigh W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/jeb.13503",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "882--889",
journal = "Journal of Evolutionary Biology",
issn = "1010-061X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

The evolution of female genitalia. / Sloan, Nadia S.; Simmons, Leigh W.

In: Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 32, No. 9, 09.2019, p. 882-889.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evolution of female genitalia

AU - Sloan, Nadia S.

AU - Simmons, Leigh W.

PY - 2019/9

Y1 - 2019/9

N2 - Female genitalia have been largely neglected in studies of genital evolution, perhaps due to the long-standing belief that they are relatively invariable and therefore taxonomically and evolutionarily uninformative in comparison with male genitalia. Contemporary studies of genital evolution have begun to dispute this view, and to demonstrate that female genitalia can be highly diverse and covary with the genitalia of males. Here, we examine evidence for three mechanisms of genital evolution in females: species isolating 'lock-and-key' evolution, cryptic female choice and sexual conflict. Lock-and-key genital evolution has been thought to be relatively unimportant; however, we present cases that show how species isolation may well play a role in the evolution of female genitalia. Much support for female genital evolution via sexual conflict comes from studies of both invertebrate and vertebrate species; however, the effects of sexual conflict can be difficult to distinguish from models of cryptic female choice that focus on putative benefits of choice for females. We offer potential solutions to alleviate this issue. Finally, we offer directions for future studies in order to expand and refine our knowledge surrounding female genital evolution.

AB - Female genitalia have been largely neglected in studies of genital evolution, perhaps due to the long-standing belief that they are relatively invariable and therefore taxonomically and evolutionarily uninformative in comparison with male genitalia. Contemporary studies of genital evolution have begun to dispute this view, and to demonstrate that female genitalia can be highly diverse and covary with the genitalia of males. Here, we examine evidence for three mechanisms of genital evolution in females: species isolating 'lock-and-key' evolution, cryptic female choice and sexual conflict. Lock-and-key genital evolution has been thought to be relatively unimportant; however, we present cases that show how species isolation may well play a role in the evolution of female genitalia. Much support for female genital evolution via sexual conflict comes from studies of both invertebrate and vertebrate species; however, the effects of sexual conflict can be difficult to distinguish from models of cryptic female choice that focus on putative benefits of choice for females. We offer potential solutions to alleviate this issue. Finally, we offer directions for future studies in order to expand and refine our knowledge surrounding female genital evolution.

KW - coevolution

KW - female choice

KW - genital evolution

KW - lock-and-key

KW - micro-computed tomography

KW - pleiotropy

KW - reproductive character displacement

KW - sexual conflict

KW - sexual selection

KW - LOCK-AND-KEY

KW - MECHANICAL REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION

KW - SEXUAL CONFLICT

KW - CORRELATED EVOLUTION

KW - WATER STRIDER

KW - RIVAL SPERM

KW - ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION

KW - CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT

KW - FUNCTIONAL-MORPHOLOGY

KW - COPULATORY COURTSHIP

U2 - 10.1111/jeb.13503

DO - 10.1111/jeb.13503

M3 - Review article

VL - 32

SP - 882

EP - 889

JO - Journal of Evolutionary Biology

JF - Journal of Evolutionary Biology

SN - 1010-061X

IS - 9

ER -