The Evidence for Abandoning the Amniotic Fluid Index in Favor of the Single Deepest Pocket

Pat Magann, S.P. Chauhan, Dorota Doherty, M.I. Magann, J.C. Morrison

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    31 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study assessed whether the amniotic fluid index (AFI) or the single deepest pocket (SDP) is the best technique to estimate amniotic fluid volume. The AFI and SDP were compared to a dye-determined or directly measured amniotic fluid volume. A PUBMED search from 1990 to 2006 was conducted using the search terms "single deepest pocket" or "largest vertical pocket" or "maximum vertical pocket" or "2X1 pocket" AND "amniotic fluid index". One study compared the AM and SDP to a dye-determined amniotic fluid volume. There were 1219 publications that used the search term SDP-LVP-MVP versus 4378 using AFI. Twenty publications contained both the AFI and SDP, but only six compared the AFI and SDP. Both the AFI and the SDP poorly identified abnormal amniotic fluid volumes, and neither technique was superior to the other. The AFI identifies a significantly greater number of women as having oligohydramnios versus the SDP but without any difference in perinatal outcomes. Compared with SDP, AM excessively characterizes a greater number of pregnancies as having oligohydrammos leading to more interventions without improvement in perinatal. outcome. The AFI should be abandoned and the SDP used to estimate amniotic fluid volume.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)549-555
    JournalAmerican Journal of Perinatology
    Volume24
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Evidence for Abandoning the Amniotic Fluid Index in Favor of the Single Deepest Pocket'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this