The everyday as the Soviet Gesamtkunstwerk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The notion of the Gesamtkunstwerk as a modern political phenomenon – the merging of art and life and the artistic transformation of life in its totality – has been limited to public political spectacle and the theatrical enactments of state programs. In contrast, this article about the Soviet 1920s and 1930s looks at everyday life or, in Russian, byt, as the primary domain of modern aesthetico-political intervention. The successful ordering of everyday life according to the principles of communism would mean that even the most intimate aspects of citizens’ lives become part of a total work of art, which now encompasses not only the public but also the private sphere. The author traces the evolution of byt reform from the aesthetic associations between bureaucrats and artists of the 1920s to the 1930s mobilization of ordinary citizens as artists who mould their everyday environments in accordance with Stalinist politics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-68
Number of pages17
JournalThesis Eleven: critical theory and historical sociology
Volume152
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

artist
everyday life
citizen
political intervention
totality
work of art
communism
mobilization
aesthetics
art
reform
politics
Gesamtkunstwerk
1920s
1930s
Artist
Everyday Life

Cite this

@article{550ba4b03ea84786836fde614b170d6f,
title = "The everyday as the Soviet Gesamtkunstwerk",
abstract = "The notion of the Gesamtkunstwerk as a modern political phenomenon – the merging of art and life and the artistic transformation of life in its totality – has been limited to public political spectacle and the theatrical enactments of state programs. In contrast, this article about the Soviet 1920s and 1930s looks at everyday life or, in Russian, byt, as the primary domain of modern aesthetico-political intervention. The successful ordering of everyday life according to the principles of communism would mean that even the most intimate aspects of citizens’ lives become part of a total work of art, which now encompasses not only the public but also the private sphere. The author traces the evolution of byt reform from the aesthetic associations between bureaucrats and artists of the 1920s to the 1930s mobilization of ordinary citizens as artists who mould their everyday environments in accordance with Stalinist politics.",
author = "Tijana Vujosevic",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0725513619850902",
language = "English",
volume = "152",
pages = "52--68",
journal = "Thesis Eleven",
issn = "0725-5136",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

The everyday as the Soviet Gesamtkunstwerk. / Vujosevic, Tijana.

In: Thesis Eleven: critical theory and historical sociology, Vol. 152, No. 1, 12.06.2019, p. 52-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The everyday as the Soviet Gesamtkunstwerk

AU - Vujosevic, Tijana

PY - 2019/6/12

Y1 - 2019/6/12

N2 - The notion of the Gesamtkunstwerk as a modern political phenomenon – the merging of art and life and the artistic transformation of life in its totality – has been limited to public political spectacle and the theatrical enactments of state programs. In contrast, this article about the Soviet 1920s and 1930s looks at everyday life or, in Russian, byt, as the primary domain of modern aesthetico-political intervention. The successful ordering of everyday life according to the principles of communism would mean that even the most intimate aspects of citizens’ lives become part of a total work of art, which now encompasses not only the public but also the private sphere. The author traces the evolution of byt reform from the aesthetic associations between bureaucrats and artists of the 1920s to the 1930s mobilization of ordinary citizens as artists who mould their everyday environments in accordance with Stalinist politics.

AB - The notion of the Gesamtkunstwerk as a modern political phenomenon – the merging of art and life and the artistic transformation of life in its totality – has been limited to public political spectacle and the theatrical enactments of state programs. In contrast, this article about the Soviet 1920s and 1930s looks at everyday life or, in Russian, byt, as the primary domain of modern aesthetico-political intervention. The successful ordering of everyday life according to the principles of communism would mean that even the most intimate aspects of citizens’ lives become part of a total work of art, which now encompasses not only the public but also the private sphere. The author traces the evolution of byt reform from the aesthetic associations between bureaucrats and artists of the 1920s to the 1930s mobilization of ordinary citizens as artists who mould their everyday environments in accordance with Stalinist politics.

U2 - 10.1177/0725513619850902

DO - 10.1177/0725513619850902

M3 - Article

VL - 152

SP - 52

EP - 68

JO - Thesis Eleven

JF - Thesis Eleven

SN - 0725-5136

IS - 1

ER -