The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance: a longitudinal field study

W. Richard Carter, Paul L. Nesbit, Richard J. Badham, Sharon K. Parker, Li-Kuo Sung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Self-efficacy’s influence on individual job performance has been well documented in laboratory studies. However, there have been very few rigorous field studies of self-efficacy’s relationship with objectively measured individual job performance in organizational settings. This research history might account for the low take-up of self-efficacy within the business literature as well as within business itself. When it comes to studies of employee engagement, the same lack of rigorous individual studies applies, although several organizational-level studies link employee engagement to organizational performance, while its claimed benefits have been widely discussed in the business literature. Finally, the degree to which employee engagement and self-efficacy have independent and additive effects on individual-level job performance remains unknown. In order to address these issues, a longitudinal field study was undertaken within an Australian financial services firm. Using survey data linked to objectively measured job performance, we found the additive effects of self-efficacy and employee engagement explained 12% of appointments made and 39% of products sold over and above that explained by past performance. This finding suggests human resource management (HRM) practitioners should address both self-efficacy and employee engagement in order to boost job performance while encouraging HRM scholars to incorporate both measures when conducting job performance studies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Human Resource Management
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Personnel
Human resource management
Industry
Field study
Self-efficacy
Employee engagement
Job performance

Cite this

@article{d063f5135269464b82b8f214b426509a,
title = "The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance: a longitudinal field study",
abstract = "Self-efficacy’s influence on individual job performance has been well documented in laboratory studies. However, there have been very few rigorous field studies of self-efficacy’s relationship with objectively measured individual job performance in organizational settings. This research history might account for the low take-up of self-efficacy within the business literature as well as within business itself. When it comes to studies of employee engagement, the same lack of rigorous individual studies applies, although several organizational-level studies link employee engagement to organizational performance, while its claimed benefits have been widely discussed in the business literature. Finally, the degree to which employee engagement and self-efficacy have independent and additive effects on individual-level job performance remains unknown. In order to address these issues, a longitudinal field study was undertaken within an Australian financial services firm. Using survey data linked to objectively measured job performance, we found the additive effects of self-efficacy and employee engagement explained 12{\%} of appointments made and 39{\%} of products sold over and above that explained by past performance. This finding suggests human resource management (HRM) practitioners should address both self-efficacy and employee engagement in order to boost job performance while encouraging HRM scholars to incorporate both measures when conducting job performance studies.",
author = "Carter, {W. Richard} and Nesbit, {Paul L.} and Badham, {Richard J.} and Parker, {Sharon K.} and Li-Kuo Sung",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1080/09585192.2016.1244096",
language = "English",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "The International Journal of Human Resource Management",
issn = "0958-5192",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance : a longitudinal field study. / Carter, W. Richard; Nesbit, Paul L.; Badham, Richard J. ; Parker, Sharon K.; Sung, Li-Kuo.

In: International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24.10.2016, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance

T2 - a longitudinal field study

AU - Carter, W. Richard

AU - Nesbit, Paul L.

AU - Badham, Richard J.

AU - Parker, Sharon K.

AU - Sung, Li-Kuo

PY - 2016/10/24

Y1 - 2016/10/24

N2 - Self-efficacy’s influence on individual job performance has been well documented in laboratory studies. However, there have been very few rigorous field studies of self-efficacy’s relationship with objectively measured individual job performance in organizational settings. This research history might account for the low take-up of self-efficacy within the business literature as well as within business itself. When it comes to studies of employee engagement, the same lack of rigorous individual studies applies, although several organizational-level studies link employee engagement to organizational performance, while its claimed benefits have been widely discussed in the business literature. Finally, the degree to which employee engagement and self-efficacy have independent and additive effects on individual-level job performance remains unknown. In order to address these issues, a longitudinal field study was undertaken within an Australian financial services firm. Using survey data linked to objectively measured job performance, we found the additive effects of self-efficacy and employee engagement explained 12% of appointments made and 39% of products sold over and above that explained by past performance. This finding suggests human resource management (HRM) practitioners should address both self-efficacy and employee engagement in order to boost job performance while encouraging HRM scholars to incorporate both measures when conducting job performance studies.

AB - Self-efficacy’s influence on individual job performance has been well documented in laboratory studies. However, there have been very few rigorous field studies of self-efficacy’s relationship with objectively measured individual job performance in organizational settings. This research history might account for the low take-up of self-efficacy within the business literature as well as within business itself. When it comes to studies of employee engagement, the same lack of rigorous individual studies applies, although several organizational-level studies link employee engagement to organizational performance, while its claimed benefits have been widely discussed in the business literature. Finally, the degree to which employee engagement and self-efficacy have independent and additive effects on individual-level job performance remains unknown. In order to address these issues, a longitudinal field study was undertaken within an Australian financial services firm. Using survey data linked to objectively measured job performance, we found the additive effects of self-efficacy and employee engagement explained 12% of appointments made and 39% of products sold over and above that explained by past performance. This finding suggests human resource management (HRM) practitioners should address both self-efficacy and employee engagement in order to boost job performance while encouraging HRM scholars to incorporate both measures when conducting job performance studies.

U2 - 10.1080/09585192.2016.1244096

DO - 10.1080/09585192.2016.1244096

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - The International Journal of Human Resource Management

JF - The International Journal of Human Resource Management

SN - 0958-5192

ER -