The effects of attentional bias modification on emotion regulation

Bram Van Bockstaele, Lies Notebaert, Colin MacLeod, Elske Salemink, Patrick J.F. Clarke, Bruno Verschuere, Susan M. Bögels, Reinout W. Wiers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and objectives: In two experiments, we investigated the effects of Attentional Bias Modification (ABM) on emotion regulation, i.e. the manner in which people influence emotional experiences. We hypothesized that decreases in attentional bias to threat would impair upregulation and improve downregulation of negative emotions, while increases in attentional bias to threat would improve upregulation and impair downregulation of negative emotions. Methods: Using the emotion-in-motion paradigm (Experiment 1, N = 60) and the visual search task (Experiment 2, N = 58), we trained participants to attend to either threatening or positive stimuli and we assessed emotion intensity while observing, upregulating, and downregulating emotions in response to grids of mixed emotional pictures. Results: In Experiment 1, the attend positive group reported more positive emotions while merely watching grids of training pictures and the attend threat group showed impaired upregulation of negative affect. In Experiment 2, the attend threat group reported intensified negative emotions for all three instructions, while the attend positive group remained largely stable over time. Limitations: We cannot unequivocally attribute these changes in emotion regulation to changes in attentional bias, as neither of the experiments yielded significant changes in attentional bias to threat. Conclusions: By showing that attentional bias modification procedures affect the manner in which people deal with emotions, we add empirical weight to the conceptual overlap between attentional bias modification and emotion regulation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-48
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Volume62
Early online date30 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Emotions
Up-Regulation
Down-Regulation
Attentional Bias
Emotion
Emotion Regulation
Experiment
Threat
Weights and Measures

Cite this

@article{b2a8a05e3d7e4055b341faccc72df0e1,
title = "The effects of attentional bias modification on emotion regulation",
abstract = "Background and objectives: In two experiments, we investigated the effects of Attentional Bias Modification (ABM) on emotion regulation, i.e. the manner in which people influence emotional experiences. We hypothesized that decreases in attentional bias to threat would impair upregulation and improve downregulation of negative emotions, while increases in attentional bias to threat would improve upregulation and impair downregulation of negative emotions. Methods: Using the emotion-in-motion paradigm (Experiment 1, N = 60) and the visual search task (Experiment 2, N = 58), we trained participants to attend to either threatening or positive stimuli and we assessed emotion intensity while observing, upregulating, and downregulating emotions in response to grids of mixed emotional pictures. Results: In Experiment 1, the attend positive group reported more positive emotions while merely watching grids of training pictures and the attend threat group showed impaired upregulation of negative affect. In Experiment 2, the attend threat group reported intensified negative emotions for all three instructions, while the attend positive group remained largely stable over time. Limitations: We cannot unequivocally attribute these changes in emotion regulation to changes in attentional bias, as neither of the experiments yielded significant changes in attentional bias to threat. Conclusions: By showing that attentional bias modification procedures affect the manner in which people deal with emotions, we add empirical weight to the conceptual overlap between attentional bias modification and emotion regulation.",
keywords = "ABM, Anxiety, Attention deployment, Attentional bias modification, Emotion regulation",
author = "{Van Bockstaele}, Bram and Lies Notebaert and Colin MacLeod and Elske Salemink and Clarke, {Patrick J.F.} and Bruno Verschuere and B{\"o}gels, {Susan M.} and Wiers, {Reinout W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.08.010",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "38--48",
journal = "Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry",
issn = "0005-7916",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

The effects of attentional bias modification on emotion regulation. / Van Bockstaele, Bram; Notebaert, Lies; MacLeod, Colin; Salemink, Elske; Clarke, Patrick J.F.; Verschuere, Bruno; Bögels, Susan M.; Wiers, Reinout W.

In: Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Vol. 62, 01.03.2019, p. 38-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of attentional bias modification on emotion regulation

AU - Van Bockstaele, Bram

AU - Notebaert, Lies

AU - MacLeod, Colin

AU - Salemink, Elske

AU - Clarke, Patrick J.F.

AU - Verschuere, Bruno

AU - Bögels, Susan M.

AU - Wiers, Reinout W.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Background and objectives: In two experiments, we investigated the effects of Attentional Bias Modification (ABM) on emotion regulation, i.e. the manner in which people influence emotional experiences. We hypothesized that decreases in attentional bias to threat would impair upregulation and improve downregulation of negative emotions, while increases in attentional bias to threat would improve upregulation and impair downregulation of negative emotions. Methods: Using the emotion-in-motion paradigm (Experiment 1, N = 60) and the visual search task (Experiment 2, N = 58), we trained participants to attend to either threatening or positive stimuli and we assessed emotion intensity while observing, upregulating, and downregulating emotions in response to grids of mixed emotional pictures. Results: In Experiment 1, the attend positive group reported more positive emotions while merely watching grids of training pictures and the attend threat group showed impaired upregulation of negative affect. In Experiment 2, the attend threat group reported intensified negative emotions for all three instructions, while the attend positive group remained largely stable over time. Limitations: We cannot unequivocally attribute these changes in emotion regulation to changes in attentional bias, as neither of the experiments yielded significant changes in attentional bias to threat. Conclusions: By showing that attentional bias modification procedures affect the manner in which people deal with emotions, we add empirical weight to the conceptual overlap between attentional bias modification and emotion regulation.

AB - Background and objectives: In two experiments, we investigated the effects of Attentional Bias Modification (ABM) on emotion regulation, i.e. the manner in which people influence emotional experiences. We hypothesized that decreases in attentional bias to threat would impair upregulation and improve downregulation of negative emotions, while increases in attentional bias to threat would improve upregulation and impair downregulation of negative emotions. Methods: Using the emotion-in-motion paradigm (Experiment 1, N = 60) and the visual search task (Experiment 2, N = 58), we trained participants to attend to either threatening or positive stimuli and we assessed emotion intensity while observing, upregulating, and downregulating emotions in response to grids of mixed emotional pictures. Results: In Experiment 1, the attend positive group reported more positive emotions while merely watching grids of training pictures and the attend threat group showed impaired upregulation of negative affect. In Experiment 2, the attend threat group reported intensified negative emotions for all three instructions, while the attend positive group remained largely stable over time. Limitations: We cannot unequivocally attribute these changes in emotion regulation to changes in attentional bias, as neither of the experiments yielded significant changes in attentional bias to threat. Conclusions: By showing that attentional bias modification procedures affect the manner in which people deal with emotions, we add empirical weight to the conceptual overlap between attentional bias modification and emotion regulation.

KW - ABM

KW - Anxiety

KW - Attention deployment

KW - Attentional bias modification

KW - Emotion regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052730712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.08.010

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 38

EP - 48

JO - Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

JF - Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

SN - 0005-7916

ER -