The effect of individual radiographers on rates of attendance to breast screening: a 7-year retrospective study

S. L. Savaridas, J. Brook, J. P. Codde, M. Bulsara, E. Wylie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To establish whether individual radiographers had significantly different rescreening rates whilst controlling for other known confounding factors. Materials and methods: Women aged 50–69 years were identified from a state-wide screening database at their first screening attendance during the study period (2007–2013). The radiographer performing this index screen and potential confounding factors were recorded and subsequent screening behaviour was assessed. Clients with abnormal screens and those known to have died during the time period were excluded. A univariate analysis of the data from 160,028 women was assessed using the chi-square test to compare those women who attended their next mammography with non-re-attenders. Logistic regression was used to calculate the likelihood of “re-attendance success” across a range of variables. The probability of re-attendance for 11 randomly selected radiographers was determined from the logistic regression model, whilst controlling for other variables. Results: Comparison of non-re-attenders (n=49,698) with 110,330 (69%) women attending the next round of screening revealed significant differences, including radiographer (Wald statistics=1188, p<0.000) even when all other known factors were controlled. Conclusion: This large, population-level study demonstrates that individual radiographer factors appear to influence a women's decision to return for their next screening round. Further research is required to identify reasons for differing rescreen rates and provide education and retraining of individual radiographers as appropriate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413.e7-413.e13
JournalClinical Radiology
Volume73
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Breast
Retrospective Studies
Logistic Models
Teaching Rounds
Mammography
Chi-Square Distribution
Databases
Education
Research
Population

Cite this

Savaridas, S. L. ; Brook, J. ; Codde, J. P. ; Bulsara, M. ; Wylie, E. / The effect of individual radiographers on rates of attendance to breast screening : a 7-year retrospective study. In: Clinical Radiology. 2018 ; Vol. 73, No. 4. pp. 413.e7-413.e13.
@article{bbb3d87b2183467a96ebd608b03ca7a5,
title = "The effect of individual radiographers on rates of attendance to breast screening: a 7-year retrospective study",
abstract = "Aim: To establish whether individual radiographers had significantly different rescreening rates whilst controlling for other known confounding factors. Materials and methods: Women aged 50–69 years were identified from a state-wide screening database at their first screening attendance during the study period (2007–2013). The radiographer performing this index screen and potential confounding factors were recorded and subsequent screening behaviour was assessed. Clients with abnormal screens and those known to have died during the time period were excluded. A univariate analysis of the data from 160,028 women was assessed using the chi-square test to compare those women who attended their next mammography with non-re-attenders. Logistic regression was used to calculate the likelihood of “re-attendance success” across a range of variables. The probability of re-attendance for 11 randomly selected radiographers was determined from the logistic regression model, whilst controlling for other variables. Results: Comparison of non-re-attenders (n=49,698) with 110,330 (69{\%}) women attending the next round of screening revealed significant differences, including radiographer (Wald statistics=1188, p<0.000) even when all other known factors were controlled. Conclusion: This large, population-level study demonstrates that individual radiographer factors appear to influence a women's decision to return for their next screening round. Further research is required to identify reasons for differing rescreen rates and provide education and retraining of individual radiographers as appropriate.",
author = "Savaridas, {S. L.} and J. Brook and Codde, {J. P.} and M. Bulsara and E. Wylie",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.crad.2017.11.010",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "413.e7--413.e13",
journal = "Clinical Radiology",
issn = "0009-9260",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

The effect of individual radiographers on rates of attendance to breast screening : a 7-year retrospective study. / Savaridas, S. L.; Brook, J.; Codde, J. P.; Bulsara, M.; Wylie, E.

In: Clinical Radiology, Vol. 73, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 413.e7-413.e13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of individual radiographers on rates of attendance to breast screening

T2 - a 7-year retrospective study

AU - Savaridas, S. L.

AU - Brook, J.

AU - Codde, J. P.

AU - Bulsara, M.

AU - Wylie, E.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Aim: To establish whether individual radiographers had significantly different rescreening rates whilst controlling for other known confounding factors. Materials and methods: Women aged 50–69 years were identified from a state-wide screening database at their first screening attendance during the study period (2007–2013). The radiographer performing this index screen and potential confounding factors were recorded and subsequent screening behaviour was assessed. Clients with abnormal screens and those known to have died during the time period were excluded. A univariate analysis of the data from 160,028 women was assessed using the chi-square test to compare those women who attended their next mammography with non-re-attenders. Logistic regression was used to calculate the likelihood of “re-attendance success” across a range of variables. The probability of re-attendance for 11 randomly selected radiographers was determined from the logistic regression model, whilst controlling for other variables. Results: Comparison of non-re-attenders (n=49,698) with 110,330 (69%) women attending the next round of screening revealed significant differences, including radiographer (Wald statistics=1188, p<0.000) even when all other known factors were controlled. Conclusion: This large, population-level study demonstrates that individual radiographer factors appear to influence a women's decision to return for their next screening round. Further research is required to identify reasons for differing rescreen rates and provide education and retraining of individual radiographers as appropriate.

AB - Aim: To establish whether individual radiographers had significantly different rescreening rates whilst controlling for other known confounding factors. Materials and methods: Women aged 50–69 years were identified from a state-wide screening database at their first screening attendance during the study period (2007–2013). The radiographer performing this index screen and potential confounding factors were recorded and subsequent screening behaviour was assessed. Clients with abnormal screens and those known to have died during the time period were excluded. A univariate analysis of the data from 160,028 women was assessed using the chi-square test to compare those women who attended their next mammography with non-re-attenders. Logistic regression was used to calculate the likelihood of “re-attendance success” across a range of variables. The probability of re-attendance for 11 randomly selected radiographers was determined from the logistic regression model, whilst controlling for other variables. Results: Comparison of non-re-attenders (n=49,698) with 110,330 (69%) women attending the next round of screening revealed significant differences, including radiographer (Wald statistics=1188, p<0.000) even when all other known factors were controlled. Conclusion: This large, population-level study demonstrates that individual radiographer factors appear to influence a women's decision to return for their next screening round. Further research is required to identify reasons for differing rescreen rates and provide education and retraining of individual radiographers as appropriate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038879661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.crad.2017.11.010

DO - 10.1016/j.crad.2017.11.010

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 413.e7-413.e13

JO - Clinical Radiology

JF - Clinical Radiology

SN - 0009-9260

IS - 4

ER -