Abstract
Firms use behavioral controls to direct employees’ attention to task-relevant information to improve learning-by-doing and task performance. We investigate whether combinations of enabling control features (repair and internal transparency, flexibility and internal transparency) improve learning. Because controls are imperfect, prior studies argue that employees should have the opportunity to override (flexibility) or adapt (repair) the controls. However, the added cognitive burden of overriding and adapting the systems will hamper immediate performance and learning if the purpose of the controls is not clearly explained to the employees (internal transparency). In an online experiment, we find that the combination of repair and internal transparency improves performance but not the combination of flexibility and internal transparency. We attribute the latter effect to the need to continuously pay attention to the controls with flexibility, while controls can be changed permanently with repair.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 2021 Management Accounting Section Midyear Meeting |
Subtitle of host publication | Research Conference, IMA Doctoral Colloquium, and CGMA Teaching Symposium |
Publisher | American Accounting Association |
Number of pages | 47 |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2021 |
Event | 2021 Management Accounting Section Midyear Meeting - Virtual Duration: 5 Jan 2021 → 9 Jan 2021 |
Conference
Conference | 2021 Management Accounting Section Midyear Meeting |
---|---|
Period | 5/01/21 → 9/01/21 |