The effect of dose on the antimalarial efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine: A systematic review and pooled analysis of individual patient data

  • N.M. Anstey
  • , R.N. Price
  • , Timothy Davis
  • , H.A. Karunajeewa
  • , I. Mueller
  • , U. D'Alessandro
  • , A. Massougbodji
  • , F. Nikiema
  • , J.B. Ouédraogo
  • , H. Tinto
  • , I. Zongo
  • , A. Same-Ekobo
  • , M. Koné
  • , H. Menan
  • , W. Yavo
  • , A.O. Touré
  • , P.E. Kofoed
  • , B.H. Alemayehu
  • , D. Jima
  • , E. Baudin
  • E. Espié, C. Nabasumba, L. Pinoges, B. Schramm, M. Cot, P. Deloron, J.F. Faucher, J.P. Guthmann, B. Lell, S. Borrmann, G.O. Adjei, J. Ursing, E. Tjitra, K. Marsh, J. Peshu, E. Juma, B.R. Ogutu, S.A. Omar, P. Sawa, A.O. Talisuna, M. Khanthavong, M. Mayxay, P.N. Newton, P. Piola, A.A. Djimdé, O.K. Doumbo, B. Fofana, I. Sagara, Q. Bassat, R. González, C. Menéndez, F. Smithuis, T. Bousema, P.A. Kager, P.F. Mens, H.D.F.H. Schallig, I. Van Den Broek, M. Van Vugt, M.L. Ibrahim, C.O. Falade, M. Meremikwu, J.P. Gil, C. Karema, M.S. Ba, B. Faye, O. Faye, O. Gaye, J.L. Ndiaye

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. Background: Artemether-lumefantrine is the most widely used artemisinin-based combination therapy for malaria, although treatment failures occur in some regions. We investigated the effect of dosing strategy on efficacy in a pooled analysis from trials done in a wide range of malaria-endemic settings. Methods: We searched PubMed for clinical trials that enrolled and treated patients with artemether-lumefantrine and were published from 1960 to December, 2012. We merged individual patient data from these trials by use of standardised methods. The primary endpoint was the PCR-adjusted risk of Plasmodium falciparum recrudescence by day 28. Secondary endpoints consisted of the PCR-adjusted risk of P falciparum recurrence by day 42, PCR-unadjusted risk of P falciparum recurrence by day 42, early parasite clearance, and gametocyte carriage. Risk factors for PCR-adjusted recrudescence were identified using Cox's regression model with frailty shared across the study sites. Findings: We included 61 studies done between January, 1998, and December, 2012, and included 14 327 patients in our analyses. The PCR-adjusted therapeutic efficacy was 97·6% (95% CI 97·4-97·9) at day 28 and 96·0% (95·6-96·5) at day 42. After controlling for age and parasitaemia, patients prescribed a higher dose of artemether had a lower risk of having parasitaemia on day 1 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·92, 95% CI 0·86-0·99 for every 1 mg/kg increase in daily artemether dose; p=0·024), but not on day 2 (p=0·69) or day 3 (0·087). In Asia, children weighing 10-15 kg who received a total lumefantrine dose less than 60 mg/kg had the lowest PCR-adjusted efficacy (91·7%, 95% CI 86·5-96·9). In Africa, the risk of treatment failure was greatest in malnourished children aged 1-3 years (PCR-adjusted efficacy 94·3%, 95% CI 92·3-96·3). A higher artemether dose was associated with a lower gametocyte presence within 14 days of treatment (adjusted OR 0·92, 95% CI 0·85-0·99; p=0·037 for every 1 mg/kg increase in total artemether dose). Interpretation: The recommended dose of artemether-lumefantrine provides reliable efficacy in most patients with uncomplicated malaria. However, therapeutic efficacy was lowest in young children from Asia and young underweight children from Africa; a higher dose regimen should be assessed in these groups. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)692-702
    JournalThe Lancet Infectious Diseases
    Volume15
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
      SDG 2 Zero Hunger
    2. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of dose on the antimalarial efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine: A systematic review and pooled analysis of individual patient data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this