The economic value of shark-diving tourism in Australia

Charlie Huveneers, Mark G. Meekan, Kirin Apps, Luciana C. Ferreira, David Pannell, Gabriel M. S. Vianna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)
114 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Shark-diving is part of a rapidly growing industry focused on marine wildlife tourism. Our study aimed to provide an estimate of the economic value of shark-diving tourism across Australia by comprehensively surveying the whale shark (Rhincodon typus), white shark (Carcharodon carcharias), grey nurse shark (Carcharias taurus), and reef shark (mostly Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos and Triaenodon obesus) diving industries using a standardised approach. A socio-economic survey targeted tourist divers between March 2013 and June 2014 and collected information on expenditures related to diving, accommodation, transport, living costs, and other related activities during divers’ trips. A total of 711 tourist surveys were completed across the four industries, with the total annual direct expenditure by shark divers in Australia estimated conservatively at $25.5 M. Additional expenditure provided by the white-shark and whale-shark-diving industries totalled $8.1 and $12.5 M for the Port Lincoln and Ningaloo Reef regions respectively. International tourists diving with white sharks also expended another $0.9 M in airfares and other activities while in Australia. These additional revenues show that the economic value of this type of tourism do not flow solely to the industry, but are also spread across the region where it is hosted. This highlights the need to ensure a sustainable dive-tourism industry through adequate management of both shark-diver interactions and biological management of the species on which it is based. Our study also provides standardised estimates which allow for future comparison of the scale of other wildlife tourism industries (not limited to sharks) within or among countries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)665-680
Number of pages16
JournalReviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Fingerprint

tourism
diving
shark
sharks
economic valuation
Carcharodon carcharias
tourists
industry
economics
Triaenodon obesus
wildlife
reefs
Ginglymostoma cirratum
Carcharias
expenditure
Carcharhinus
whale
socioeconomics
income
reef

Cite this

Huveneers, Charlie ; Meekan, Mark G. ; Apps, Kirin ; Ferreira, Luciana C. ; Pannell, David ; Vianna, Gabriel M. S. / The economic value of shark-diving tourism in Australia. In: Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 2017 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 665-680.
@article{343b76fca25d4b73af8c71ad4ffcff16,
title = "The economic value of shark-diving tourism in Australia",
abstract = "Shark-diving is part of a rapidly growing industry focused on marine wildlife tourism. Our study aimed to provide an estimate of the economic value of shark-diving tourism across Australia by comprehensively surveying the whale shark (Rhincodon typus), white shark (Carcharodon carcharias), grey nurse shark (Carcharias taurus), and reef shark (mostly Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos and Triaenodon obesus) diving industries using a standardised approach. A socio-economic survey targeted tourist divers between March 2013 and June 2014 and collected information on expenditures related to diving, accommodation, transport, living costs, and other related activities during divers’ trips. A total of 711 tourist surveys were completed across the four industries, with the total annual direct expenditure by shark divers in Australia estimated conservatively at $25.5 M. Additional expenditure provided by the white-shark and whale-shark-diving industries totalled $8.1 and $12.5 M for the Port Lincoln and Ningaloo Reef regions respectively. International tourists diving with white sharks also expended another $0.9 M in airfares and other activities while in Australia. These additional revenues show that the economic value of this type of tourism do not flow solely to the industry, but are also spread across the region where it is hosted. This highlights the need to ensure a sustainable dive-tourism industry through adequate management of both shark-diver interactions and biological management of the species on which it is based. Our study also provides standardised estimates which allow for future comparison of the scale of other wildlife tourism industries (not limited to sharks) within or among countries.",
keywords = "Economic evaluation, Grey nurse sharks, Reef sharks, Whale sharks, White sharks, Wildlife tourism",
author = "Charlie Huveneers and Meekan, {Mark G.} and Kirin Apps and Ferreira, {Luciana C.} and David Pannell and Vianna, {Gabriel M. S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11160-017-9486-x",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "665--680",
journal = "Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries",
issn = "0960-3166",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

The economic value of shark-diving tourism in Australia. / Huveneers, Charlie; Meekan, Mark G.; Apps, Kirin; Ferreira, Luciana C.; Pannell, David; Vianna, Gabriel M. S.

In: Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, Vol. 27, No. 3, 09.2017, p. 665-680.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The economic value of shark-diving tourism in Australia

AU - Huveneers, Charlie

AU - Meekan, Mark G.

AU - Apps, Kirin

AU - Ferreira, Luciana C.

AU - Pannell, David

AU - Vianna, Gabriel M. S.

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - Shark-diving is part of a rapidly growing industry focused on marine wildlife tourism. Our study aimed to provide an estimate of the economic value of shark-diving tourism across Australia by comprehensively surveying the whale shark (Rhincodon typus), white shark (Carcharodon carcharias), grey nurse shark (Carcharias taurus), and reef shark (mostly Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos and Triaenodon obesus) diving industries using a standardised approach. A socio-economic survey targeted tourist divers between March 2013 and June 2014 and collected information on expenditures related to diving, accommodation, transport, living costs, and other related activities during divers’ trips. A total of 711 tourist surveys were completed across the four industries, with the total annual direct expenditure by shark divers in Australia estimated conservatively at $25.5 M. Additional expenditure provided by the white-shark and whale-shark-diving industries totalled $8.1 and $12.5 M for the Port Lincoln and Ningaloo Reef regions respectively. International tourists diving with white sharks also expended another $0.9 M in airfares and other activities while in Australia. These additional revenues show that the economic value of this type of tourism do not flow solely to the industry, but are also spread across the region where it is hosted. This highlights the need to ensure a sustainable dive-tourism industry through adequate management of both shark-diver interactions and biological management of the species on which it is based. Our study also provides standardised estimates which allow for future comparison of the scale of other wildlife tourism industries (not limited to sharks) within or among countries.

AB - Shark-diving is part of a rapidly growing industry focused on marine wildlife tourism. Our study aimed to provide an estimate of the economic value of shark-diving tourism across Australia by comprehensively surveying the whale shark (Rhincodon typus), white shark (Carcharodon carcharias), grey nurse shark (Carcharias taurus), and reef shark (mostly Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos and Triaenodon obesus) diving industries using a standardised approach. A socio-economic survey targeted tourist divers between March 2013 and June 2014 and collected information on expenditures related to diving, accommodation, transport, living costs, and other related activities during divers’ trips. A total of 711 tourist surveys were completed across the four industries, with the total annual direct expenditure by shark divers in Australia estimated conservatively at $25.5 M. Additional expenditure provided by the white-shark and whale-shark-diving industries totalled $8.1 and $12.5 M for the Port Lincoln and Ningaloo Reef regions respectively. International tourists diving with white sharks also expended another $0.9 M in airfares and other activities while in Australia. These additional revenues show that the economic value of this type of tourism do not flow solely to the industry, but are also spread across the region where it is hosted. This highlights the need to ensure a sustainable dive-tourism industry through adequate management of both shark-diver interactions and biological management of the species on which it is based. Our study also provides standardised estimates which allow for future comparison of the scale of other wildlife tourism industries (not limited to sharks) within or among countries.

KW - Economic evaluation

KW - Grey nurse sharks

KW - Reef sharks

KW - Whale sharks

KW - White sharks

KW - Wildlife tourism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020279294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11160-017-9486-x

DO - 10.1007/s11160-017-9486-x

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 665

EP - 680

JO - Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

JF - Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

SN - 0960-3166

IS - 3

ER -