TY - JOUR
T1 - The Development of Insomnia or the Plasticity of Good Sleep? A Preliminary Study of Acute Changes in Sleep and Insomnia Resulting from an Analogue Trauma
AU - Richardson, Cele
AU - Gradisar, Michael
AU - Pulford, Amanda
PY - 2015/1/2
Y1 - 2015/1/2
N2 - The present preliminary study aimed to shed light on the mechanisms underlying the development of insomnia. An analogue stressor (i.e., trauma video) was used to prevent presleep cognitive de-arousal. Subsequent changes in nocturnal sleep and sleep-related attentional processing were examined. Thirty-four participants were randomly assigned to either a cognitive arousal (trauma video; age: M = 22.9, SD = 4.3, 6 male, 11 female) or control (pleasant video; age: M = 23.8, SD = 5.8, 7 male, 10 female) condition. Although no significant differences were found for presleep cognitive de-arousal (p =.39), the cognitive arousal group experienced a significant worsening in sleep latency (p =.048, partial η2 =.12) and an increase in sleep-related attentional bias (p =.032, d = 0.51) following the manipulation. However, changes in sleep and attentional bias were not maintained. Vulnerability to stress did not significantly account for any change in attentional bias, arousal, or sleep. These findings challenge current conceptualizations of the development of insomnia, yet also supporting the notion that good sleep is a default state that protects individuals from sleep disturbance.
AB - The present preliminary study aimed to shed light on the mechanisms underlying the development of insomnia. An analogue stressor (i.e., trauma video) was used to prevent presleep cognitive de-arousal. Subsequent changes in nocturnal sleep and sleep-related attentional processing were examined. Thirty-four participants were randomly assigned to either a cognitive arousal (trauma video; age: M = 22.9, SD = 4.3, 6 male, 11 female) or control (pleasant video; age: M = 23.8, SD = 5.8, 7 male, 10 female) condition. Although no significant differences were found for presleep cognitive de-arousal (p =.39), the cognitive arousal group experienced a significant worsening in sleep latency (p =.048, partial η2 =.12) and an increase in sleep-related attentional bias (p =.032, d = 0.51) following the manipulation. However, changes in sleep and attentional bias were not maintained. Vulnerability to stress did not significantly account for any change in attentional bias, arousal, or sleep. These findings challenge current conceptualizations of the development of insomnia, yet also supporting the notion that good sleep is a default state that protects individuals from sleep disturbance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84912029349&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15402002.2013.829065
DO - 10.1080/15402002.2013.829065
M3 - Article
C2 - 24628110
AN - SCOPUS:84912029349
VL - 13
SP - 19
EP - 35
JO - Behavioral Sleep Medicine
JF - Behavioral Sleep Medicine
SN - 1540-2002
IS - 1
ER -