The Court as Pontius Pilate: Reflecting on Missed Opportunities in the PIP Decision

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Commentary to Case C-219/15 Judgment of the Court (First Chamber). Elizabeth Schmitt v TUV Rheinland LGA Products GmbH [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:128
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-47
JournalEuropean Pharmaceutical Law Review
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

chamber
EU

Cite this

@article{6bc40c7e65e848f794baf4b76fb5593e,
title = "The Court as Pontius Pilate: Reflecting on Missed Opportunities in the PIP Decision",
abstract = "Commentary to Case C-219/15 Judgment of the Court (First Chamber). Elizabeth Schmitt v TUV Rheinland LGA Products GmbH [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:128",
author = "Marco Rizzi",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.21552/eplr/2017/1/9",
language = "English",
pages = "42--47",
journal = "European Pharmaceutical Law Review",
issn = "2511-7157",
publisher = "Lexxion",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Court as Pontius Pilate: Reflecting on Missed Opportunities in the PIP Decision

AU - Rizzi, Marco

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Commentary to Case C-219/15 Judgment of the Court (First Chamber). Elizabeth Schmitt v TUV Rheinland LGA Products GmbH [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:128

AB - Commentary to Case C-219/15 Judgment of the Court (First Chamber). Elizabeth Schmitt v TUV Rheinland LGA Products GmbH [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:128

U2 - 10.21552/eplr/2017/1/9

DO - 10.21552/eplr/2017/1/9

M3 - Article

SP - 42

EP - 47

JO - European Pharmaceutical Law Review

JF - European Pharmaceutical Law Review

SN - 2511-7157

ER -