TY - JOUR
T1 - The costs and benefits of REDD+
T2 - A review of the literature
AU - Rakatama, Ari
AU - Pandit, Ram
AU - Ma, Chunbo
AU - Iftekhar, Sayed
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - The costs and benefits of the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) projects are often reported in isolation. There is a lack of comprehensive understanding of the types of REDD+ costs and benefits reported in the literature. In this paper, we conducted a review of 60 unique REDD+ costs and benefits studies. We found that no single study covers all categories of costs and benefits in a comparable form. A total of 56 comparable estimates were available for opportunity costs, 21 for transaction and implementation costs, 23 for total costs, and only four for direct monetary benefits. We found that, on average, the total REDD+ cost ($24.87/tCO2e) was 2.23 times higher than the opportunity cost and the opportunity cost was 3.28 times higher than the transaction and implementation costs. Costs estimates among studies vary widely based on estimation approach used and the scale of the studies. We noted that future REDD+ costs and benefits studies should provide estimates of all relevant costs and benefits, and the distribution of these costs and benefits among project stakeholders. These findings have implications in REDD+ project design and implementation.
AB - The costs and benefits of the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) projects are often reported in isolation. There is a lack of comprehensive understanding of the types of REDD+ costs and benefits reported in the literature. In this paper, we conducted a review of 60 unique REDD+ costs and benefits studies. We found that no single study covers all categories of costs and benefits in a comparable form. A total of 56 comparable estimates were available for opportunity costs, 21 for transaction and implementation costs, 23 for total costs, and only four for direct monetary benefits. We found that, on average, the total REDD+ cost ($24.87/tCO2e) was 2.23 times higher than the opportunity cost and the opportunity cost was 3.28 times higher than the transaction and implementation costs. Costs estimates among studies vary widely based on estimation approach used and the scale of the studies. We noted that future REDD+ costs and benefits studies should provide estimates of all relevant costs and benefits, and the distribution of these costs and benefits among project stakeholders. These findings have implications in REDD+ project design and implementation.
KW - Direct benefit
KW - Estimation approach
KW - Implementation cost
KW - Opportunity cost
KW - REDD
KW - Transaction cost
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994860599&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.08.006
DO - 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.08.006
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84994860599
SN - 1389-9341
VL - 75
SP - 103
EP - 111
JO - Forest Policy and Economics
JF - Forest Policy and Economics
ER -