The contribution of epiphyton to the primary production of tropical floodplain wetlands

Maria F. Adame, Neil E. Pettit, Dominic Valdez, Doug Ward, Michele A. Burford, Stuart E. Bunn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Tropical floodplains are one of the most productive ecosystems on earth. Studies on floodplain productivity have primarily focused on trees and macrophytes, rather than algae, due to their greater biomass. However, epiphyton—algae and bacteria attached to the submerged portion of aquatic macrophytes—is a major source of energy in many tropical floodplains. Epiphyton productivity rates are unknown for most tropical floodplain wetlands, and spatial variability is not well understood. In this study, we measured primary productivity of epiphyton in Kakadu National Park in northern Australia. We estimated the relative contribution of epiphyton to aquatic production (epiphyton, + phytoplankton + macrophytes). We sampled sites dominated by different macrophyte structural types: vertical emerging grasses, horizontal emerging grasses, submerged macrophytes, and macrophytes with floating leaves. Epiphyton productivity was highly influenced by the structural type of the macrophyte. Highest potential productivity per weight was measured from epiphyton growing on macrophytes with floating leaves and horizontal grasses (1.52 ± 0.53 and 1.82 ± 0.61 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively) and lowest in submerged macrophytes and vertical grasses (0.57 ± 0.26 and 0.66 ± 0.47 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively). When considering the areal biomass of the macrophyte and the amount of epiphyton attached, epiphyton on horizontal grasses and submerged macrophytes had productivity values approximately ten times higher (45–219 mgC/m2/d) compared to those on vertical grasses and macrophytes with floating leaves (2–18 mgC/m2/d). Epiphyton contributed between 2 to 13 percent to the aquatic production of these tropical floodplain wetlands.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)461-471
Number of pages11
JournalBiotropica
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

macrophytes
floodplains
primary production
primary productivity
floodplain
wetlands
wetland
grass
productivity
grasses
macrophyte
algae
biomass
leaves
national park
alga
phytoplankton
national parks
bacterium
ecosystem

Cite this

Adame, Maria F. ; Pettit, Neil E. ; Valdez, Dominic ; Ward, Doug ; Burford, Michele A. ; Bunn, Stuart E. / The contribution of epiphyton to the primary production of tropical floodplain wetlands. In: Biotropica. 2017 ; Vol. 49, No. 4. pp. 461-471.
@article{cd8f4e7076de4920a3581619a795bca8,
title = "The contribution of epiphyton to the primary production of tropical floodplain wetlands",
abstract = "Tropical floodplains are one of the most productive ecosystems on earth. Studies on floodplain productivity have primarily focused on trees and macrophytes, rather than algae, due to their greater biomass. However, epiphyton—algae and bacteria attached to the submerged portion of aquatic macrophytes—is a major source of energy in many tropical floodplains. Epiphyton productivity rates are unknown for most tropical floodplain wetlands, and spatial variability is not well understood. In this study, we measured primary productivity of epiphyton in Kakadu National Park in northern Australia. We estimated the relative contribution of epiphyton to aquatic production (epiphyton, + phytoplankton + macrophytes). We sampled sites dominated by different macrophyte structural types: vertical emerging grasses, horizontal emerging grasses, submerged macrophytes, and macrophytes with floating leaves. Epiphyton productivity was highly influenced by the structural type of the macrophyte. Highest potential productivity per weight was measured from epiphyton growing on macrophytes with floating leaves and horizontal grasses (1.52 ± 0.53 and 1.82 ± 0.61 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively) and lowest in submerged macrophytes and vertical grasses (0.57 ± 0.26 and 0.66 ± 0.47 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively). When considering the areal biomass of the macrophyte and the amount of epiphyton attached, epiphyton on horizontal grasses and submerged macrophytes had productivity values approximately ten times higher (45–219 mgC/m2/d) compared to those on vertical grasses and macrophytes with floating leaves (2–18 mgC/m2/d). Epiphyton contributed between 2 to 13 percent to the aquatic production of these tropical floodplain wetlands.",
keywords = "Australia, epiphyton, Kakadu, macrophyte, paragrass, phytoplankton, productivity, wetland",
author = "Adame, {Maria F.} and Pettit, {Neil E.} and Dominic Valdez and Doug Ward and Burford, {Michele A.} and Bunn, {Stuart E.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/btp.12445",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "461--471",
journal = "Biotropica",
issn = "0006-3606",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

The contribution of epiphyton to the primary production of tropical floodplain wetlands. / Adame, Maria F.; Pettit, Neil E.; Valdez, Dominic; Ward, Doug; Burford, Michele A.; Bunn, Stuart E.

In: Biotropica, Vol. 49, No. 4, 01.07.2017, p. 461-471.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The contribution of epiphyton to the primary production of tropical floodplain wetlands

AU - Adame, Maria F.

AU - Pettit, Neil E.

AU - Valdez, Dominic

AU - Ward, Doug

AU - Burford, Michele A.

AU - Bunn, Stuart E.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Tropical floodplains are one of the most productive ecosystems on earth. Studies on floodplain productivity have primarily focused on trees and macrophytes, rather than algae, due to their greater biomass. However, epiphyton—algae and bacteria attached to the submerged portion of aquatic macrophytes—is a major source of energy in many tropical floodplains. Epiphyton productivity rates are unknown for most tropical floodplain wetlands, and spatial variability is not well understood. In this study, we measured primary productivity of epiphyton in Kakadu National Park in northern Australia. We estimated the relative contribution of epiphyton to aquatic production (epiphyton, + phytoplankton + macrophytes). We sampled sites dominated by different macrophyte structural types: vertical emerging grasses, horizontal emerging grasses, submerged macrophytes, and macrophytes with floating leaves. Epiphyton productivity was highly influenced by the structural type of the macrophyte. Highest potential productivity per weight was measured from epiphyton growing on macrophytes with floating leaves and horizontal grasses (1.52 ± 0.53 and 1.82 ± 0.61 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively) and lowest in submerged macrophytes and vertical grasses (0.57 ± 0.26 and 0.66 ± 0.47 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively). When considering the areal biomass of the macrophyte and the amount of epiphyton attached, epiphyton on horizontal grasses and submerged macrophytes had productivity values approximately ten times higher (45–219 mgC/m2/d) compared to those on vertical grasses and macrophytes with floating leaves (2–18 mgC/m2/d). Epiphyton contributed between 2 to 13 percent to the aquatic production of these tropical floodplain wetlands.

AB - Tropical floodplains are one of the most productive ecosystems on earth. Studies on floodplain productivity have primarily focused on trees and macrophytes, rather than algae, due to their greater biomass. However, epiphyton—algae and bacteria attached to the submerged portion of aquatic macrophytes—is a major source of energy in many tropical floodplains. Epiphyton productivity rates are unknown for most tropical floodplain wetlands, and spatial variability is not well understood. In this study, we measured primary productivity of epiphyton in Kakadu National Park in northern Australia. We estimated the relative contribution of epiphyton to aquatic production (epiphyton, + phytoplankton + macrophytes). We sampled sites dominated by different macrophyte structural types: vertical emerging grasses, horizontal emerging grasses, submerged macrophytes, and macrophytes with floating leaves. Epiphyton productivity was highly influenced by the structural type of the macrophyte. Highest potential productivity per weight was measured from epiphyton growing on macrophytes with floating leaves and horizontal grasses (1.52 ± 0.53 and 1.82 ± 0.61 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively) and lowest in submerged macrophytes and vertical grasses (0.57 ± 0.26 and 0.66 ± 0.47 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively). When considering the areal biomass of the macrophyte and the amount of epiphyton attached, epiphyton on horizontal grasses and submerged macrophytes had productivity values approximately ten times higher (45–219 mgC/m2/d) compared to those on vertical grasses and macrophytes with floating leaves (2–18 mgC/m2/d). Epiphyton contributed between 2 to 13 percent to the aquatic production of these tropical floodplain wetlands.

KW - Australia

KW - epiphyton

KW - Kakadu

KW - macrophyte

KW - paragrass

KW - phytoplankton

KW - productivity

KW - wetland

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018554609&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/btp.12445

DO - 10.1111/btp.12445

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 461

EP - 471

JO - Biotropica

JF - Biotropica

SN - 0006-3606

IS - 4

ER -