The continuous disclosure obligations in Australia: do they still have substantive content and can those relying on public disclosures make confident informed decisions?

Gillian North

The continuous disclosure obligations in Australia: do they still have substantive content and can those relying on public disclosures make confident informed decisions?

Gillian North

UWA Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	233-252
Journal	Australian Journal of Corporate Law
Volume	28
Publication status	Published - 2013

Cite this

North, G. (2013). The continuous disclosure obligations in Australia: do they still have substantive content and can those relying on public disclosures make confident informed decisions? Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 28, 233-252.

@article{ad971f9d79d44b28b9b6642a6d96bb5b,

title = "The continuous disclosure obligations in Australia: do they still have substantive content and can those relying on public disclosures make confident informed decisions?",

author = "Gillian North",

year = "2013",

language = "English",

volume = "28",

pages = "233--252",

journal = "Australian Journal of Corporate Law",

issn = "1037-4124",

}