The Changing Agenda of Race Issues in Local Government: the Case of a London Borough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper argues that race issues in local government are not composed of a single uniform agenda. Instead, the agenda varies between locality and over time. These agendas are the product of the interaction between the level of organizational coherence and the degree of racial explicitness of local politics and policy‐making. The case of Ealing Borough demonstrates the extent to which the language and substance of race policy debate‐ the agenda of race ‐was transformed over the period analysed (1965–86). The traditional liberal framework for public policy discussion of racerelated issues has served to shape ‐ and constrain ‐ the local politics of race in Britain. Despite a number of important setbacks and failures, the framework continues to exert considerable influence in the way in which it devolves race policy to local arenas, places heavy and unmanageable burdens on the voluntary sector, gives priority to racial harmony over racial equality goals, and denies legitimacy to those groups committed to racially explicit political strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100-121
Number of pages22
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

local politics
political strategy
equality
legitimacy
public policy
interaction
language
Group
time
coherence

Cite this

@article{c2d578f50293419ca75eb24469ea93b8,
title = "The Changing Agenda of Race Issues in Local Government: the Case of a London Borough",
abstract = "The paper argues that race issues in local government are not composed of a single uniform agenda. Instead, the agenda varies between locality and over time. These agendas are the product of the interaction between the level of organizational coherence and the degree of racial explicitness of local politics and policy‐making. The case of Ealing Borough demonstrates the extent to which the language and substance of race policy debate‐ the agenda of race ‐was transformed over the period analysed (1965–86). The traditional liberal framework for public policy discussion of racerelated issues has served to shape ‐ and constrain ‐ the local politics of race in Britain. Despite a number of important setbacks and failures, the framework continues to exert considerable influence in the way in which it devolves race policy to local arenas, places heavy and unmanageable burdens on the voluntary sector, gives priority to racial harmony over racial equality goals, and denies legitimacy to those groups committed to racially explicit political strategies.",
author = "Shamit Saggar",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb00583.x",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "100--121",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

The Changing Agenda of Race Issues in Local Government : the Case of a London Borough. / Saggar, Shamit.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.01.1991, p. 100-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Changing Agenda of Race Issues in Local Government

T2 - the Case of a London Borough

AU - Saggar, Shamit

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - The paper argues that race issues in local government are not composed of a single uniform agenda. Instead, the agenda varies between locality and over time. These agendas are the product of the interaction between the level of organizational coherence and the degree of racial explicitness of local politics and policy‐making. The case of Ealing Borough demonstrates the extent to which the language and substance of race policy debate‐ the agenda of race ‐was transformed over the period analysed (1965–86). The traditional liberal framework for public policy discussion of racerelated issues has served to shape ‐ and constrain ‐ the local politics of race in Britain. Despite a number of important setbacks and failures, the framework continues to exert considerable influence in the way in which it devolves race policy to local arenas, places heavy and unmanageable burdens on the voluntary sector, gives priority to racial harmony over racial equality goals, and denies legitimacy to those groups committed to racially explicit political strategies.

AB - The paper argues that race issues in local government are not composed of a single uniform agenda. Instead, the agenda varies between locality and over time. These agendas are the product of the interaction between the level of organizational coherence and the degree of racial explicitness of local politics and policy‐making. The case of Ealing Borough demonstrates the extent to which the language and substance of race policy debate‐ the agenda of race ‐was transformed over the period analysed (1965–86). The traditional liberal framework for public policy discussion of racerelated issues has served to shape ‐ and constrain ‐ the local politics of race in Britain. Despite a number of important setbacks and failures, the framework continues to exert considerable influence in the way in which it devolves race policy to local arenas, places heavy and unmanageable burdens on the voluntary sector, gives priority to racial harmony over racial equality goals, and denies legitimacy to those groups committed to racially explicit political strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933483784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb00583.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb00583.x

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 100

EP - 121

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 1

ER -