TY - JOUR
T1 - The case against distributed representations: Lack of evidence
AU - Farrell, S.
AU - Lewandowsky, Stephan
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - We focus on two components of Page's argument in favour of localist representations in connectionist networks: First, we take issue with the claim that localist representations can give rise to generalisation and show that whenever generalisation occurs, distributed representations are involved. Second, we counter the alleged shortcomings of distributed representations and show that their properties are preferable to those of localist approaches.
AB - We focus on two components of Page's argument in favour of localist representations in connectionist networks: First, we take issue with the claim that localist representations can give rise to generalisation and show that whenever generalisation occurs, distributed representations are involved. Second, we counter the alleged shortcomings of distributed representations and show that their properties are preferable to those of localist approaches.
U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X00313358
DO - 10.1017/S0140525X00313358
M3 - Review article
SN - 0140-525X
VL - 23
SP - 476
JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
IS - 4
ER -