The Beliefs about Voices Questionnaire – Revised: A factor structure from 450 participants

Clara Strauss, Kenneth Hugdahl, Flavie Waters, Mark Hayward, Josef J. Bless, Liv E. Falkenberg, Bodil Kråkvik, Arve Egil Asbjørnsen, Erik Johnsen, Igne Sinkeviciute, Rune A. Kroken, Else Marie Løberg, Neil Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hallucinated voices are common across psychiatric and non-clinical groups. The predominant cognitive theory about the impact of voices posits that beliefs about voice power (‘Omnipotence’) and voice intent (‘Malevolence’/‘Benevolence’) play a key role in determining emotional and behavioral reactions. The revised Beliefs about Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ-R) was designed to assess these constructs, together with two styles of responding (Engagement and Resistance). The BAVQ-R is widely used in clinical and research settings, yet it has not received validation of its constructs and factor structure. This study examined the factor structure of the BAVQ-R by combining datasets from five study centers, comprising 450 participants (belief constructs) and 269 participants (response styles), and using confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis. Findings failed to support a three factor belief model, instead showing a two-factor structure (‘Persecutory beliefs’ combining Omnipotence and Malevolence constructs, and a Benevolent construct). Emotional and behavioral items did not separate. Overall, results showed that (i) a two-factor model of beliefs (Persecutory and Benevolent beliefs) provides a better fit to the data than a three-factor model, and (ii) emotional and behavioral modes of responding items should not be separated. Theoretical implications of this finding are discussed in relation to the research and therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-103
Number of pages9
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume259
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Beneficence
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research
Statistical Factor Analysis
Psychiatry
Therapeutics
Datasets

Cite this

Strauss, Clara ; Hugdahl, Kenneth ; Waters, Flavie ; Hayward, Mark ; Bless, Josef J. ; Falkenberg, Liv E. ; Kråkvik, Bodil ; Asbjørnsen, Arve Egil ; Johnsen, Erik ; Sinkeviciute, Igne ; Kroken, Rune A. ; Løberg, Else Marie ; Thomas, Neil. / The Beliefs about Voices Questionnaire – Revised : A factor structure from 450 participants. In: Psychiatry Research. 2018 ; Vol. 259. pp. 95-103.
@article{c2e797ef1f934f748b9a531eeecf01a6,
title = "The Beliefs about Voices Questionnaire – Revised: A factor structure from 450 participants",
abstract = "Hallucinated voices are common across psychiatric and non-clinical groups. The predominant cognitive theory about the impact of voices posits that beliefs about voice power (‘Omnipotence’) and voice intent (‘Malevolence’/‘Benevolence’) play a key role in determining emotional and behavioral reactions. The revised Beliefs about Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ-R) was designed to assess these constructs, together with two styles of responding (Engagement and Resistance). The BAVQ-R is widely used in clinical and research settings, yet it has not received validation of its constructs and factor structure. This study examined the factor structure of the BAVQ-R by combining datasets from five study centers, comprising 450 participants (belief constructs) and 269 participants (response styles), and using confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis. Findings failed to support a three factor belief model, instead showing a two-factor structure (‘Persecutory beliefs’ combining Omnipotence and Malevolence constructs, and a Benevolent construct). Emotional and behavioral items did not separate. Overall, results showed that (i) a two-factor model of beliefs (Persecutory and Benevolent beliefs) provides a better fit to the data than a three-factor model, and (ii) emotional and behavioral modes of responding items should not be separated. Theoretical implications of this finding are discussed in relation to the research and therapy.",
keywords = "BAVQ, Beliefs about voices, Hallucinations, Hearing voices, Malevolence, Omnipotence",
author = "Clara Strauss and Kenneth Hugdahl and Flavie Waters and Mark Hayward and Bless, {Josef J.} and Falkenberg, {Liv E.} and Bodil Kr{\aa}kvik and Asbj{\o}rnsen, {Arve Egil} and Erik Johnsen and Igne Sinkeviciute and Kroken, {Rune A.} and L{\o}berg, {Else Marie} and Neil Thomas",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.089",
language = "English",
volume = "259",
pages = "95--103",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Strauss, C, Hugdahl, K, Waters, F, Hayward, M, Bless, JJ, Falkenberg, LE, Kråkvik, B, Asbjørnsen, AE, Johnsen, E, Sinkeviciute, I, Kroken, RA, Løberg, EM & Thomas, N 2018, 'The Beliefs about Voices Questionnaire – Revised: A factor structure from 450 participants' Psychiatry Research, vol. 259, pp. 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.089

The Beliefs about Voices Questionnaire – Revised : A factor structure from 450 participants. / Strauss, Clara; Hugdahl, Kenneth; Waters, Flavie; Hayward, Mark; Bless, Josef J.; Falkenberg, Liv E.; Kråkvik, Bodil; Asbjørnsen, Arve Egil; Johnsen, Erik; Sinkeviciute, Igne; Kroken, Rune A.; Løberg, Else Marie; Thomas, Neil.

In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 259, 01.01.2018, p. 95-103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Beliefs about Voices Questionnaire – Revised

T2 - A factor structure from 450 participants

AU - Strauss, Clara

AU - Hugdahl, Kenneth

AU - Waters, Flavie

AU - Hayward, Mark

AU - Bless, Josef J.

AU - Falkenberg, Liv E.

AU - Kråkvik, Bodil

AU - Asbjørnsen, Arve Egil

AU - Johnsen, Erik

AU - Sinkeviciute, Igne

AU - Kroken, Rune A.

AU - Løberg, Else Marie

AU - Thomas, Neil

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Hallucinated voices are common across psychiatric and non-clinical groups. The predominant cognitive theory about the impact of voices posits that beliefs about voice power (‘Omnipotence’) and voice intent (‘Malevolence’/‘Benevolence’) play a key role in determining emotional and behavioral reactions. The revised Beliefs about Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ-R) was designed to assess these constructs, together with two styles of responding (Engagement and Resistance). The BAVQ-R is widely used in clinical and research settings, yet it has not received validation of its constructs and factor structure. This study examined the factor structure of the BAVQ-R by combining datasets from five study centers, comprising 450 participants (belief constructs) and 269 participants (response styles), and using confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis. Findings failed to support a three factor belief model, instead showing a two-factor structure (‘Persecutory beliefs’ combining Omnipotence and Malevolence constructs, and a Benevolent construct). Emotional and behavioral items did not separate. Overall, results showed that (i) a two-factor model of beliefs (Persecutory and Benevolent beliefs) provides a better fit to the data than a three-factor model, and (ii) emotional and behavioral modes of responding items should not be separated. Theoretical implications of this finding are discussed in relation to the research and therapy.

AB - Hallucinated voices are common across psychiatric and non-clinical groups. The predominant cognitive theory about the impact of voices posits that beliefs about voice power (‘Omnipotence’) and voice intent (‘Malevolence’/‘Benevolence’) play a key role in determining emotional and behavioral reactions. The revised Beliefs about Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ-R) was designed to assess these constructs, together with two styles of responding (Engagement and Resistance). The BAVQ-R is widely used in clinical and research settings, yet it has not received validation of its constructs and factor structure. This study examined the factor structure of the BAVQ-R by combining datasets from five study centers, comprising 450 participants (belief constructs) and 269 participants (response styles), and using confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis. Findings failed to support a three factor belief model, instead showing a two-factor structure (‘Persecutory beliefs’ combining Omnipotence and Malevolence constructs, and a Benevolent construct). Emotional and behavioral items did not separate. Overall, results showed that (i) a two-factor model of beliefs (Persecutory and Benevolent beliefs) provides a better fit to the data than a three-factor model, and (ii) emotional and behavioral modes of responding items should not be separated. Theoretical implications of this finding are discussed in relation to the research and therapy.

KW - BAVQ

KW - Beliefs about voices

KW - Hallucinations

KW - Hearing voices

KW - Malevolence

KW - Omnipotence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031763931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.089

DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.089

M3 - Article

VL - 259

SP - 95

EP - 103

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

ER -