The Australian Work Exposures Study: Occupational Exposure to Lead and Lead Compounds

T.R. Driscoll, R.N. Carey, Susan Peters, D.C. Glass, G. Benke, A. Reid, L. Fritschi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2015 The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.
Introduction: The aims of this study were to produce a population-based estimate of the prevalence of work-related exposure to lead and its compounds, to identify the main circumstances of exposures, and to collect information on the use of workplace control measures designed to decrease those exposures.
Methods: Data came from the Australian Workplace Exposures Study, a nationwide telephone survey which investigated the current prevalence and circumstances of work-related exposure to 38 known or suspected carcinogens, including lead, among Australian workers aged 18-65 years. Using the web-based tool, OccIDEAS, semi-quantitative information was collected about exposures in the current job held by the respondent. Questions were addressed primarily at tasks undertaken rather than about self-reported exposures.
Results: A total of 307 (6.1%) of the 4993 included respondents were identified as probably being exposed to lead in the course of their work. Of these, almost all (96%) were male; about half worked in trades and technician-related occupations, and about half worked in the construction industry. The main tasks associated with probable exposures were, in decreasing order: soldering; sanding and burning off paint while painting old houses, ships, or bridges; plumbing work; cleaning up or sifting through the remains of a fire; radiator-repair work; machining metals or alloys containing lead; mining; welding leaded steel; and working at or using indoor firing ranges. Where information on control measures was available, inconsistent use was reported. Applied to the Australian working population, approximately 6.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.6-7.0] of all workers (i.e. 631000, 95% CI 566000-704000 workers) were estimated to have probable occupational exposure to lead.
Conclusions: Lead remains an important exposure in many different occupational circumstances in Australia and probably other developed countries. This information can be used to support decisions on priorities for intervention and control of occupational exposure to lead and estimates of burden of cancer arising from occupational exposure to lead.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-123
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Occupational Hygiene
Volume60
Issue number1
Early online date31 Aug 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Occupational Exposure
Workplace
Sanitary Engineering
Confidence Intervals
Construction Industry
Welding
Paintings
Paint
Ships
Steel
Hygiene
Occupations
Developed Countries
Telephone
Carcinogens
Population
Metals
Lead
Surveys and Questionnaires
Neoplasms

Cite this

Driscoll, T.R. ; Carey, R.N. ; Peters, Susan ; Glass, D.C. ; Benke, G. ; Reid, A. ; Fritschi, L. / The Australian Work Exposures Study: Occupational Exposure to Lead and Lead Compounds. In: Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2016 ; Vol. 60, No. 1. pp. 113-123.
@article{b896d2b3112e4ff4a1072da69755d70b,
title = "The Australian Work Exposures Study: Occupational Exposure to Lead and Lead Compounds",
abstract = "{\circledC} 2015 The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society. Introduction: The aims of this study were to produce a population-based estimate of the prevalence of work-related exposure to lead and its compounds, to identify the main circumstances of exposures, and to collect information on the use of workplace control measures designed to decrease those exposures. Methods: Data came from the Australian Workplace Exposures Study, a nationwide telephone survey which investigated the current prevalence and circumstances of work-related exposure to 38 known or suspected carcinogens, including lead, among Australian workers aged 18-65 years. Using the web-based tool, OccIDEAS, semi-quantitative information was collected about exposures in the current job held by the respondent. Questions were addressed primarily at tasks undertaken rather than about self-reported exposures. Results: A total of 307 (6.1{\%}) of the 4993 included respondents were identified as probably being exposed to lead in the course of their work. Of these, almost all (96{\%}) were male; about half worked in trades and technician-related occupations, and about half worked in the construction industry. The main tasks associated with probable exposures were, in decreasing order: soldering; sanding and burning off paint while painting old houses, ships, or bridges; plumbing work; cleaning up or sifting through the remains of a fire; radiator-repair work; machining metals or alloys containing lead; mining; welding leaded steel; and working at or using indoor firing ranges. Where information on control measures was available, inconsistent use was reported. Applied to the Australian working population, approximately 6.3{\%} [95{\%} confidence interval (CI) = 5.6-7.0] of all workers (i.e. 631000, 95{\%} CI 566000-704000 workers) were estimated to have probable occupational exposure to lead. Conclusions: Lead remains an important exposure in many different occupational circumstances in Australia and probably other developed countries. This information can be used to support decisions on priorities for intervention and control of occupational exposure to lead and estimates of burden of cancer arising from occupational exposure to lead.",
author = "T.R. Driscoll and R.N. Carey and Susan Peters and D.C. Glass and G. Benke and A. Reid and L. Fritschi",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1093/annhyg/mev056",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "113--123",
journal = "The Annals of Occupational Hygiene",
issn = "0003-4878",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

The Australian Work Exposures Study: Occupational Exposure to Lead and Lead Compounds. / Driscoll, T.R.; Carey, R.N.; Peters, Susan; Glass, D.C.; Benke, G.; Reid, A.; Fritschi, L.

In: Annals of Occupational Hygiene, Vol. 60, No. 1, 01.2016, p. 113-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Australian Work Exposures Study: Occupational Exposure to Lead and Lead Compounds

AU - Driscoll, T.R.

AU - Carey, R.N.

AU - Peters, Susan

AU - Glass, D.C.

AU - Benke, G.

AU - Reid, A.

AU - Fritschi, L.

PY - 2016/1

Y1 - 2016/1

N2 - © 2015 The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society. Introduction: The aims of this study were to produce a population-based estimate of the prevalence of work-related exposure to lead and its compounds, to identify the main circumstances of exposures, and to collect information on the use of workplace control measures designed to decrease those exposures. Methods: Data came from the Australian Workplace Exposures Study, a nationwide telephone survey which investigated the current prevalence and circumstances of work-related exposure to 38 known or suspected carcinogens, including lead, among Australian workers aged 18-65 years. Using the web-based tool, OccIDEAS, semi-quantitative information was collected about exposures in the current job held by the respondent. Questions were addressed primarily at tasks undertaken rather than about self-reported exposures. Results: A total of 307 (6.1%) of the 4993 included respondents were identified as probably being exposed to lead in the course of their work. Of these, almost all (96%) were male; about half worked in trades and technician-related occupations, and about half worked in the construction industry. The main tasks associated with probable exposures were, in decreasing order: soldering; sanding and burning off paint while painting old houses, ships, or bridges; plumbing work; cleaning up or sifting through the remains of a fire; radiator-repair work; machining metals or alloys containing lead; mining; welding leaded steel; and working at or using indoor firing ranges. Where information on control measures was available, inconsistent use was reported. Applied to the Australian working population, approximately 6.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.6-7.0] of all workers (i.e. 631000, 95% CI 566000-704000 workers) were estimated to have probable occupational exposure to lead. Conclusions: Lead remains an important exposure in many different occupational circumstances in Australia and probably other developed countries. This information can be used to support decisions on priorities for intervention and control of occupational exposure to lead and estimates of burden of cancer arising from occupational exposure to lead.

AB - © 2015 The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society. Introduction: The aims of this study were to produce a population-based estimate of the prevalence of work-related exposure to lead and its compounds, to identify the main circumstances of exposures, and to collect information on the use of workplace control measures designed to decrease those exposures. Methods: Data came from the Australian Workplace Exposures Study, a nationwide telephone survey which investigated the current prevalence and circumstances of work-related exposure to 38 known or suspected carcinogens, including lead, among Australian workers aged 18-65 years. Using the web-based tool, OccIDEAS, semi-quantitative information was collected about exposures in the current job held by the respondent. Questions were addressed primarily at tasks undertaken rather than about self-reported exposures. Results: A total of 307 (6.1%) of the 4993 included respondents were identified as probably being exposed to lead in the course of their work. Of these, almost all (96%) were male; about half worked in trades and technician-related occupations, and about half worked in the construction industry. The main tasks associated with probable exposures were, in decreasing order: soldering; sanding and burning off paint while painting old houses, ships, or bridges; plumbing work; cleaning up or sifting through the remains of a fire; radiator-repair work; machining metals or alloys containing lead; mining; welding leaded steel; and working at or using indoor firing ranges. Where information on control measures was available, inconsistent use was reported. Applied to the Australian working population, approximately 6.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.6-7.0] of all workers (i.e. 631000, 95% CI 566000-704000 workers) were estimated to have probable occupational exposure to lead. Conclusions: Lead remains an important exposure in many different occupational circumstances in Australia and probably other developed countries. This information can be used to support decisions on priorities for intervention and control of occupational exposure to lead and estimates of burden of cancer arising from occupational exposure to lead.

U2 - 10.1093/annhyg/mev056

DO - 10.1093/annhyg/mev056

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 113

EP - 123

JO - The Annals of Occupational Hygiene

JF - The Annals of Occupational Hygiene

SN - 0003-4878

IS - 1

ER -