The assessment of decision-making competence in patients with depression using the MacArthur competence assessment tools: A systematic review

Y.-Y. Wang, S.-B. Wang, G.S. Ungvari, X. Yu, C.H. Ng, Y.T. Xiang

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: This is a systematic review of the usefulness of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tools (MacCAT) in assessing the decision-making competence in patients with depression. Design and Methods: A systematic literature search was performed. Findings: Eleven studies met the search criteria. The decision-making capacity was impaired in 9–31% of the patients with depression. There was inconsistency regarding the differences of MacCAT scores between patients with depression and controls, while relatively large effect sizes were found on the Appreciation and Reasoning MacCAT subscales. Practice Implications: The MacCAT appears to be a useful tool for measuring decision-making capacity in patients with depression, but the association between depression and competence is not consistent. The mechanisms mediating such association are likely to be complex and multifactorial.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)206-211
    Number of pages6
    JournalPerspectives in Psychiatric Care
    Volume54
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

    Fingerprint

    Mental Competency
    Decision Making
    Depression

    Cite this

    @article{a67555df7cf74aaca43432003ce00ed0,
    title = "The assessment of decision-making competence in patients with depression using the MacArthur competence assessment tools: A systematic review",
    abstract = "Purpose: This is a systematic review of the usefulness of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tools (MacCAT) in assessing the decision-making competence in patients with depression. Design and Methods: A systematic literature search was performed. Findings: Eleven studies met the search criteria. The decision-making capacity was impaired in 9–31{\%} of the patients with depression. There was inconsistency regarding the differences of MacCAT scores between patients with depression and controls, while relatively large effect sizes were found on the Appreciation and Reasoning MacCAT subscales. Practice Implications: The MacCAT appears to be a useful tool for measuring decision-making capacity in patients with depression, but the association between depression and competence is not consistent. The mechanisms mediating such association are likely to be complex and multifactorial.",
    keywords = "decision-making capacity, depression, MacArthur competence assessment tools, systematic review",
    author = "Y.-Y. Wang and S.-B. Wang and G.S. Ungvari and X. Yu and C.H. Ng and Y.T. Xiang",
    year = "2018",
    month = "4",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/ppc.12224",
    language = "English",
    volume = "54",
    pages = "206--211",
    journal = "Perspectives in Psychiatric Care",
    issn = "0031-5990",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "2",

    }

    The assessment of decision-making competence in patients with depression using the MacArthur competence assessment tools : A systematic review. / Wang, Y.-Y.; Wang, S.-B.; Ungvari, G.S.; Yu, X.; Ng, C.H.; Xiang, Y.T.

    In: Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, Vol. 54, No. 2, 01.04.2018, p. 206-211.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The assessment of decision-making competence in patients with depression using the MacArthur competence assessment tools

    T2 - A systematic review

    AU - Wang, Y.-Y.

    AU - Wang, S.-B.

    AU - Ungvari, G.S.

    AU - Yu, X.

    AU - Ng, C.H.

    AU - Xiang, Y.T.

    PY - 2018/4/1

    Y1 - 2018/4/1

    N2 - Purpose: This is a systematic review of the usefulness of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tools (MacCAT) in assessing the decision-making competence in patients with depression. Design and Methods: A systematic literature search was performed. Findings: Eleven studies met the search criteria. The decision-making capacity was impaired in 9–31% of the patients with depression. There was inconsistency regarding the differences of MacCAT scores between patients with depression and controls, while relatively large effect sizes were found on the Appreciation and Reasoning MacCAT subscales. Practice Implications: The MacCAT appears to be a useful tool for measuring decision-making capacity in patients with depression, but the association between depression and competence is not consistent. The mechanisms mediating such association are likely to be complex and multifactorial.

    AB - Purpose: This is a systematic review of the usefulness of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tools (MacCAT) in assessing the decision-making competence in patients with depression. Design and Methods: A systematic literature search was performed. Findings: Eleven studies met the search criteria. The decision-making capacity was impaired in 9–31% of the patients with depression. There was inconsistency regarding the differences of MacCAT scores between patients with depression and controls, while relatively large effect sizes were found on the Appreciation and Reasoning MacCAT subscales. Practice Implications: The MacCAT appears to be a useful tool for measuring decision-making capacity in patients with depression, but the association between depression and competence is not consistent. The mechanisms mediating such association are likely to be complex and multifactorial.

    KW - decision-making capacity

    KW - depression

    KW - MacArthur competence assessment tools

    KW - systematic review

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045136872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/ppc.12224

    DO - 10.1111/ppc.12224

    M3 - Article

    VL - 54

    SP - 206

    EP - 211

    JO - Perspectives in Psychiatric Care

    JF - Perspectives in Psychiatric Care

    SN - 0031-5990

    IS - 2

    ER -