THE APOLOGY ORDINANCE: BOLD STEPS INTO SOME UNCHARTED AREAS OF APOLOGY PROTECTING LEGISLATION

Prue Vines, Robyn Carroll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Apology Ordinance (Cap 631) commenced on 1 December 2017. This legislation is the first apology-protecting legislation in Asia, adding to similar legislation in many common law jurisdictions. In this article, we consider the need for, aims of and some concerns about, apology-protecting legislation and the ways that the Apology Ordinance advances the objects of the legislation: to reduce the frequency of and animosity associated with litigation. The Ordinance has a number of features similar to other apology legislation, as well as new features which have not been incorporated into legislation elsewhere. This article analyses these features of the legislation and issues that may arise in the future and discusses these in light of the objects of the legislation. Our analysis explains why, by taking bold steps in some areas, the Hong Kong Ordinance has become the most comprehensive apology-protecting legislation in existence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)925-951
Number of pages27
JournalHong Kong Law Journal
Volume48
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

@article{f796fe2afd464a15aa286de6967cd284,
title = "THE APOLOGY ORDINANCE: BOLD STEPS INTO SOME UNCHARTED AREAS OF APOLOGY PROTECTING LEGISLATION",
abstract = "The Apology Ordinance (Cap 631) commenced on 1 December 2017. This legislation is the first apology-protecting legislation in Asia, adding to similar legislation in many common law jurisdictions. In this article, we consider the need for, aims of and some concerns about, apology-protecting legislation and the ways that the Apology Ordinance advances the objects of the legislation: to reduce the frequency of and animosity associated with litigation. The Ordinance has a number of features similar to other apology legislation, as well as new features which have not been incorporated into legislation elsewhere. This article analyses these features of the legislation and issues that may arise in the future and discusses these in light of the objects of the legislation. Our analysis explains why, by taking bold steps in some areas, the Hong Kong Ordinance has become the most comprehensive apology-protecting legislation in existence.",
keywords = "LAW",
author = "Prue Vines and Robyn Carroll",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "925--951",
journal = "Hong Kong Law Journal",
issn = "0378-0600",
publisher = "Sweet & Maxwell Ltd",

}

THE APOLOGY ORDINANCE : BOLD STEPS INTO SOME UNCHARTED AREAS OF APOLOGY PROTECTING LEGISLATION. / Vines, Prue; Carroll, Robyn.

In: Hong Kong Law Journal, Vol. 48, 2018, p. 925-951.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - THE APOLOGY ORDINANCE

T2 - BOLD STEPS INTO SOME UNCHARTED AREAS OF APOLOGY PROTECTING LEGISLATION

AU - Vines, Prue

AU - Carroll, Robyn

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The Apology Ordinance (Cap 631) commenced on 1 December 2017. This legislation is the first apology-protecting legislation in Asia, adding to similar legislation in many common law jurisdictions. In this article, we consider the need for, aims of and some concerns about, apology-protecting legislation and the ways that the Apology Ordinance advances the objects of the legislation: to reduce the frequency of and animosity associated with litigation. The Ordinance has a number of features similar to other apology legislation, as well as new features which have not been incorporated into legislation elsewhere. This article analyses these features of the legislation and issues that may arise in the future and discusses these in light of the objects of the legislation. Our analysis explains why, by taking bold steps in some areas, the Hong Kong Ordinance has become the most comprehensive apology-protecting legislation in existence.

AB - The Apology Ordinance (Cap 631) commenced on 1 December 2017. This legislation is the first apology-protecting legislation in Asia, adding to similar legislation in many common law jurisdictions. In this article, we consider the need for, aims of and some concerns about, apology-protecting legislation and the ways that the Apology Ordinance advances the objects of the legislation: to reduce the frequency of and animosity associated with litigation. The Ordinance has a number of features similar to other apology legislation, as well as new features which have not been incorporated into legislation elsewhere. This article analyses these features of the legislation and issues that may arise in the future and discusses these in light of the objects of the legislation. Our analysis explains why, by taking bold steps in some areas, the Hong Kong Ordinance has become the most comprehensive apology-protecting legislation in existence.

KW - LAW

UR - http://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=8&SID=F6kronrnAYKxSJcFcpJ&page=1&doc=1

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 925

EP - 951

JO - Hong Kong Law Journal

JF - Hong Kong Law Journal

SN - 0378-0600

ER -