Ten-year review of rating scales. VI: Scales assessing externalizing behaviors

Brent R. Collett, Jeneva L. Ohan, Kathleen M. Myers

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This is the sixth article in a series of 10-year reviews of rating scales. The current article reviews scales that assess externalizing behaviors such as disruptive behavior disorders and aggression. Method: Relevant scales were found by searching popular electronic databases. The search was then broadened by a review of the references in selected articles. Due to the paucity of well-established scales, any such scales with potential utility for elucidating the functioning of youths with externalizing behaviors were selected. Results: None of these scales is diagnosis-based, although some correlate with DSM-IV-defined disruptive behavior disorders. Most scales assessing disruptive behavior disorders have a solid normative base, good psychometric functioning, and high clinical utility. Scales assessing aggression comprise a bimodal group. Several have been adapted from the adult literature and are widely used in clinical practice, while others address theoretical aspects of aggression and are used predominantly in research. Empirical support for all of the scales assessing aggression varies widely, although several show potential for routine clinical practice. Conclusions: Overall, these scales measure a variety of constructs with considerable utility for assessing youths' externalizing behaviors, predicting outcome, and evaluating treatment effects. Many need further validation with youth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1143-1170
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume42
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders
Aggression
Psychometrics
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Databases
Research

Cite this

@article{f4af7f6159bf428ea7b5e4ea3d05c642,
title = "Ten-year review of rating scales. VI: Scales assessing externalizing behaviors",
abstract = "Objective: This is the sixth article in a series of 10-year reviews of rating scales. The current article reviews scales that assess externalizing behaviors such as disruptive behavior disorders and aggression. Method: Relevant scales were found by searching popular electronic databases. The search was then broadened by a review of the references in selected articles. Due to the paucity of well-established scales, any such scales with potential utility for elucidating the functioning of youths with externalizing behaviors were selected. Results: None of these scales is diagnosis-based, although some correlate with DSM-IV-defined disruptive behavior disorders. Most scales assessing disruptive behavior disorders have a solid normative base, good psychometric functioning, and high clinical utility. Scales assessing aggression comprise a bimodal group. Several have been adapted from the adult literature and are widely used in clinical practice, while others address theoretical aspects of aggression and are used predominantly in research. Empirical support for all of the scales assessing aggression varies widely, although several show potential for routine clinical practice. Conclusions: Overall, these scales measure a variety of constructs with considerable utility for assessing youths' externalizing behaviors, predicting outcome, and evaluating treatment effects. Many need further validation with youth.",
keywords = "Aggression, Assessment, Conduct disorder, Disruptive behavior disorders, Oppositional defiant disorder, Rating scales",
author = "Collett, {Brent R.} and Ohan, {Jeneva L.} and Myers, {Kathleen M.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00004583-200310000-00006",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1143--1170",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry",
issn = "0890-8567",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "10",

}

Ten-year review of rating scales. VI : Scales assessing externalizing behaviors. / Collett, Brent R.; Ohan, Jeneva L.; Myers, Kathleen M.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 42, No. 10, 01.01.2003, p. 1143-1170.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ten-year review of rating scales. VI

T2 - Scales assessing externalizing behaviors

AU - Collett, Brent R.

AU - Ohan, Jeneva L.

AU - Myers, Kathleen M.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Objective: This is the sixth article in a series of 10-year reviews of rating scales. The current article reviews scales that assess externalizing behaviors such as disruptive behavior disorders and aggression. Method: Relevant scales were found by searching popular electronic databases. The search was then broadened by a review of the references in selected articles. Due to the paucity of well-established scales, any such scales with potential utility for elucidating the functioning of youths with externalizing behaviors were selected. Results: None of these scales is diagnosis-based, although some correlate with DSM-IV-defined disruptive behavior disorders. Most scales assessing disruptive behavior disorders have a solid normative base, good psychometric functioning, and high clinical utility. Scales assessing aggression comprise a bimodal group. Several have been adapted from the adult literature and are widely used in clinical practice, while others address theoretical aspects of aggression and are used predominantly in research. Empirical support for all of the scales assessing aggression varies widely, although several show potential for routine clinical practice. Conclusions: Overall, these scales measure a variety of constructs with considerable utility for assessing youths' externalizing behaviors, predicting outcome, and evaluating treatment effects. Many need further validation with youth.

AB - Objective: This is the sixth article in a series of 10-year reviews of rating scales. The current article reviews scales that assess externalizing behaviors such as disruptive behavior disorders and aggression. Method: Relevant scales were found by searching popular electronic databases. The search was then broadened by a review of the references in selected articles. Due to the paucity of well-established scales, any such scales with potential utility for elucidating the functioning of youths with externalizing behaviors were selected. Results: None of these scales is diagnosis-based, although some correlate with DSM-IV-defined disruptive behavior disorders. Most scales assessing disruptive behavior disorders have a solid normative base, good psychometric functioning, and high clinical utility. Scales assessing aggression comprise a bimodal group. Several have been adapted from the adult literature and are widely used in clinical practice, while others address theoretical aspects of aggression and are used predominantly in research. Empirical support for all of the scales assessing aggression varies widely, although several show potential for routine clinical practice. Conclusions: Overall, these scales measure a variety of constructs with considerable utility for assessing youths' externalizing behaviors, predicting outcome, and evaluating treatment effects. Many need further validation with youth.

KW - Aggression

KW - Assessment

KW - Conduct disorder

KW - Disruptive behavior disorders

KW - Oppositional defiant disorder

KW - Rating scales

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142258999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00004583-200310000-00006

DO - 10.1097/00004583-200310000-00006

M3 - Review article

VL - 42

SP - 1143

EP - 1170

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

SN - 0890-8567

IS - 10

ER -