Team Performance Archetypes: Toward a New Conceptualization of Team Performance Over Time

Narda R. Quigley, Catherine G. Collins, Cristina B. Gibson, Sharon K. Parker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine the concept of team performance and propose a framework to understand patterns of change over time. Following a literature review on team performance (focusing on empirical articles published between 2007 and 2017) and drawing on Greek and Roman mythology, we identify five team performance trajectories: “Jupiter” (consistently high performing), “Neptune” (relatively steady, average performance), “Pluto” (low performing), “Icarus” (initially high performing, with a downward spiral), and “Odysseus” (initially low to midrange performing, with an upward spiral), which we refer to as “team performance archetypes.” We discuss how they might be used in conjunction with growth modeling methodology to help facilitate theory building and data collection/analysis with respect to team performance. In addition, we discuss the future research implications associated with using the archetypes to help conceptualize patterns of team performance over time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)787-824
Number of pages38
JournalGroup and Organization Management
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Pluto
Mythology
Growth
Team Performance
Conceptualization
Archetypes
Team performance
Spiral

Cite this

@article{08cbeb04e07a4ed3bd8d8adc063b5a5d,
title = "Team Performance Archetypes: Toward a New Conceptualization of Team Performance Over Time",
abstract = "We examine the concept of team performance and propose a framework to understand patterns of change over time. Following a literature review on team performance (focusing on empirical articles published between 2007 and 2017) and drawing on Greek and Roman mythology, we identify five team performance trajectories: “Jupiter” (consistently high performing), “Neptune” (relatively steady, average performance), “Pluto” (low performing), “Icarus” (initially high performing, with a downward spiral), and “Odysseus” (initially low to midrange performing, with an upward spiral), which we refer to as “team performance archetypes.” We discuss how they might be used in conjunction with growth modeling methodology to help facilitate theory building and data collection/analysis with respect to team performance. In addition, we discuss the future research implications associated with using the archetypes to help conceptualize patterns of team performance over time.",
keywords = "group or team development, group or team dynamics/processes, group or team effectiveness or performance, longitudinal, theory or theory building",
author = "Quigley, {Narda R.} and Collins, {Catherine G.} and Gibson, {Cristina B.} and Parker, {Sharon K.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1059601118794344",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "787--824",
journal = "GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT",
issn = "1059-6011",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Team Performance Archetypes : Toward a New Conceptualization of Team Performance Over Time. / Quigley, Narda R.; Collins, Catherine G.; Gibson, Cristina B.; Parker, Sharon K.

In: Group and Organization Management, Vol. 43, No. 5, 01.10.2018, p. 787-824.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Team Performance Archetypes

T2 - Toward a New Conceptualization of Team Performance Over Time

AU - Quigley, Narda R.

AU - Collins, Catherine G.

AU - Gibson, Cristina B.

AU - Parker, Sharon K.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - We examine the concept of team performance and propose a framework to understand patterns of change over time. Following a literature review on team performance (focusing on empirical articles published between 2007 and 2017) and drawing on Greek and Roman mythology, we identify five team performance trajectories: “Jupiter” (consistently high performing), “Neptune” (relatively steady, average performance), “Pluto” (low performing), “Icarus” (initially high performing, with a downward spiral), and “Odysseus” (initially low to midrange performing, with an upward spiral), which we refer to as “team performance archetypes.” We discuss how they might be used in conjunction with growth modeling methodology to help facilitate theory building and data collection/analysis with respect to team performance. In addition, we discuss the future research implications associated with using the archetypes to help conceptualize patterns of team performance over time.

AB - We examine the concept of team performance and propose a framework to understand patterns of change over time. Following a literature review on team performance (focusing on empirical articles published between 2007 and 2017) and drawing on Greek and Roman mythology, we identify five team performance trajectories: “Jupiter” (consistently high performing), “Neptune” (relatively steady, average performance), “Pluto” (low performing), “Icarus” (initially high performing, with a downward spiral), and “Odysseus” (initially low to midrange performing, with an upward spiral), which we refer to as “team performance archetypes.” We discuss how they might be used in conjunction with growth modeling methodology to help facilitate theory building and data collection/analysis with respect to team performance. In addition, we discuss the future research implications associated with using the archetypes to help conceptualize patterns of team performance over time.

KW - group or team development

KW - group or team dynamics/processes

KW - group or team effectiveness or performance

KW - longitudinal

KW - theory or theory building

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053323354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1059601118794344

DO - 10.1177/1059601118794344

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 787

EP - 824

JO - GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT

JF - GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT

SN - 1059-6011

IS - 5

ER -