Teaching Statutory Interpretation in Australia: What's Next?

Jacinta Dharmananda, Patricia Lane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The issue of whether statutory interpretation should be taught in law schools has been a difficult and divisive topic. Australia, like other common law jurisdictions, has grappled with the issue. Those advocating that it be treated as a discrete and significant area in the law school curriculum have struggled over the last two decades. Recently, however, an important step was taken. In 2015, the Council of Australian Law Deans, which comprises the Deans of all university law schools in Australia, formally approved a Guide which acknowledges the relevance and importance of statutory interpretation in a law degree and outlines learning outcomes to be achieved. This leads to the important question of how to teach the subject. This article addresses some of the issues relevant to an assessment of how to teach statutory interpretation. Following a brief examination of the Australian, US and UK experiences, the article offers suggestions, based on the Guide, international literature, and the authors' own teaching experience, about important threshold issues such as teaching as a discrete subject, content, timing, and perception.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-45
JournalStatute Law Review
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

school law
interpretation
Teaching
Law
common law
jurisdiction
experience
curriculum
examination
university
learning

Cite this

@article{c0339f27668a420da8db078f6e51f45b,
title = "Teaching Statutory Interpretation in Australia: What's Next?",
abstract = "The issue of whether statutory interpretation should be taught in law schools has been a difficult and divisive topic. Australia, like other common law jurisdictions, has grappled with the issue. Those advocating that it be treated as a discrete and significant area in the law school curriculum have struggled over the last two decades. Recently, however, an important step was taken. In 2015, the Council of Australian Law Deans, which comprises the Deans of all university law schools in Australia, formally approved a Guide which acknowledges the relevance and importance of statutory interpretation in a law degree and outlines learning outcomes to be achieved. This leads to the important question of how to teach the subject. This article addresses some of the issues relevant to an assessment of how to teach statutory interpretation. Following a brief examination of the Australian, US and UK experiences, the article offers suggestions, based on the Guide, international literature, and the authors' own teaching experience, about important threshold issues such as teaching as a discrete subject, content, timing, and perception.",
author = "Jacinta Dharmananda and Patricia Lane",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1093/slr/hmw030",
language = "English",
pages = "27--45",
journal = "Statute Law Review",
issn = "0144-3593",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

Teaching Statutory Interpretation in Australia: What's Next? / Dharmananda, Jacinta; Lane, Patricia.

In: Statute Law Review, 2016, p. 27-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teaching Statutory Interpretation in Australia: What's Next?

AU - Dharmananda, Jacinta

AU - Lane, Patricia

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The issue of whether statutory interpretation should be taught in law schools has been a difficult and divisive topic. Australia, like other common law jurisdictions, has grappled with the issue. Those advocating that it be treated as a discrete and significant area in the law school curriculum have struggled over the last two decades. Recently, however, an important step was taken. In 2015, the Council of Australian Law Deans, which comprises the Deans of all university law schools in Australia, formally approved a Guide which acknowledges the relevance and importance of statutory interpretation in a law degree and outlines learning outcomes to be achieved. This leads to the important question of how to teach the subject. This article addresses some of the issues relevant to an assessment of how to teach statutory interpretation. Following a brief examination of the Australian, US and UK experiences, the article offers suggestions, based on the Guide, international literature, and the authors' own teaching experience, about important threshold issues such as teaching as a discrete subject, content, timing, and perception.

AB - The issue of whether statutory interpretation should be taught in law schools has been a difficult and divisive topic. Australia, like other common law jurisdictions, has grappled with the issue. Those advocating that it be treated as a discrete and significant area in the law school curriculum have struggled over the last two decades. Recently, however, an important step was taken. In 2015, the Council of Australian Law Deans, which comprises the Deans of all university law schools in Australia, formally approved a Guide which acknowledges the relevance and importance of statutory interpretation in a law degree and outlines learning outcomes to be achieved. This leads to the important question of how to teach the subject. This article addresses some of the issues relevant to an assessment of how to teach statutory interpretation. Following a brief examination of the Australian, US and UK experiences, the article offers suggestions, based on the Guide, international literature, and the authors' own teaching experience, about important threshold issues such as teaching as a discrete subject, content, timing, and perception.

U2 - 10.1093/slr/hmw030

DO - 10.1093/slr/hmw030

M3 - Article

SP - 27

EP - 45

JO - Statute Law Review

JF - Statute Law Review

SN - 0144-3593

ER -