TY - JOUR
T1 - Tansley review no 89 - Uptake of aluminium by plant cells
AU - Rengel, Z
PY - 1996/11
Y1 - 1996/11
N2 - The question of intracellular or extracellular primary lesion in the Al toxicity syndrome is unresolved. One of the crucial points for answering that question is quantification of Al fluxes across the plasma membrane within seconds or minutes of exposure of roots to Al, i.e. concurrent with or preceding the first symptoms of Al toxicity. A review of the available literature on Al uptake shows that there is abundant information on Al accumulation in root tissues only after the relatively prolonged uptake period, ranging from 30 min-to over 24 h. Most of these reports either assume or claim explicitly that intracellular Al mas measured, even though Al ions are bound strongly to negative charges in the apoplasm. Therefore, an effective and complete desorption of apoplasmic Al after the uptake period is crucial for measurements of intracellular Al. However, published studies do not seem to hare desorbed cell-wall bound Al appropriately. Recent studies with giant algal cells of Chara corallina, where physical separation of cell wall and cytoplasm after the uptake period can be achieved surgically, showed that desorption of Al from the apoplasm, even employing a wider variety of desorbents and more stringent conditions than in any of the previously published reports, cannot be achieved completely within 5 h. Consequently, measured rates of uptake of Al across the plasma membrane of intact Chara cells employing the cell wall/cytoplasm separation technique are up to several orders of magnitude lower than previously published values in which cell-wail Al was attributed to the transmembrane uptake component. Although there is no doubt that Al does cross the plasma membrane, no information exists about which Al species or complexes take part in the transmembrane flux, mainly because of complexities inherent in Al speciation at the solution/ion exchanger (i.e. the cell wall and the membrane) interface. Similarly, it is not known which membrane transporters are involved in transport of Al across the plasma membrane. The Al-resistant plant genotypes generally accumulate less Al in the root tips than do the Al-sensitive genotypes. No direct relationship, however, appears to exist between increased organic acid extrusion as a mechanism of resistance to Al and decreased transmembrane flux of Al. Al-accumulator plant species accumulate relatively large amounts of Al in their tissues without having a greater Al uptake rate than non-accumulator genotypes. Progress in deciphering structural and functional aspects of transport of Al across the plasma membrane of intact plant cells will rely on using giant algal cells in which physical separation of the cell wall and the cytoplasm can be achieved, because, at present, there is no reliable quantitative method which can overcome problems presented by a relatively large apoplasmic. Al pool remaining after desorption of intact root cells of higher plants.
AB - The question of intracellular or extracellular primary lesion in the Al toxicity syndrome is unresolved. One of the crucial points for answering that question is quantification of Al fluxes across the plasma membrane within seconds or minutes of exposure of roots to Al, i.e. concurrent with or preceding the first symptoms of Al toxicity. A review of the available literature on Al uptake shows that there is abundant information on Al accumulation in root tissues only after the relatively prolonged uptake period, ranging from 30 min-to over 24 h. Most of these reports either assume or claim explicitly that intracellular Al mas measured, even though Al ions are bound strongly to negative charges in the apoplasm. Therefore, an effective and complete desorption of apoplasmic Al after the uptake period is crucial for measurements of intracellular Al. However, published studies do not seem to hare desorbed cell-wall bound Al appropriately. Recent studies with giant algal cells of Chara corallina, where physical separation of cell wall and cytoplasm after the uptake period can be achieved surgically, showed that desorption of Al from the apoplasm, even employing a wider variety of desorbents and more stringent conditions than in any of the previously published reports, cannot be achieved completely within 5 h. Consequently, measured rates of uptake of Al across the plasma membrane of intact Chara cells employing the cell wall/cytoplasm separation technique are up to several orders of magnitude lower than previously published values in which cell-wail Al was attributed to the transmembrane uptake component. Although there is no doubt that Al does cross the plasma membrane, no information exists about which Al species or complexes take part in the transmembrane flux, mainly because of complexities inherent in Al speciation at the solution/ion exchanger (i.e. the cell wall and the membrane) interface. Similarly, it is not known which membrane transporters are involved in transport of Al across the plasma membrane. The Al-resistant plant genotypes generally accumulate less Al in the root tips than do the Al-sensitive genotypes. No direct relationship, however, appears to exist between increased organic acid extrusion as a mechanism of resistance to Al and decreased transmembrane flux of Al. Al-accumulator plant species accumulate relatively large amounts of Al in their tissues without having a greater Al uptake rate than non-accumulator genotypes. Progress in deciphering structural and functional aspects of transport of Al across the plasma membrane of intact plant cells will rely on using giant algal cells in which physical separation of the cell wall and the cytoplasm can be achieved, because, at present, there is no reliable quantitative method which can overcome problems presented by a relatively large apoplasmic. Al pool remaining after desorption of intact root cells of higher plants.
KW - Chara
KW - Aluminium uptake and toxicity
KW - Apoplast and symplast
KW - Cell wall
KW - Plasma membrane
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=uwapure5-25&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:A1996VW66500002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04356.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04356.x
M3 - Review article
SN - 0028-646X
VL - 134
SP - 389
EP - 406
JO - New Phytologist
JF - New Phytologist
IS - 3
ER -