Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting

M. Maron, C. D. Ives, H. Kujala, J. W. Bull, F. J. F. Maseyk, S. Bekessy, A. Gordon, J. E. M. Watson, P. E. Lentini, P. Gibbons, H. P. Possingham, Richard Hobbs, D. A. Keith, B. A. Wintle, M. C. Evans

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    84 Citations (Scopus)


    The rising popularity of biodiversity offsetting as a tool for balancing biodiversity losses from development with equivalent gains elsewhere has sparked debate on many fronts. The fundamental questions are the following: Is offsetting good, bad, or at least better than the status quo for biodiversity conservation outcomes, and what do we need to know to decide? We present a concise synthesis of the most contentious issues related to biodiversity offsetting, categorized as ethical, social, technical, or governance challenges. In each case, we discuss avenues for reducing disagreement over these issues and identify those that are likely to remain unresolved. We argue that there are many risks associated with the unscrutinized expansion of offset policy. Nevertheless, governments are increasingly adopting offset policies, so working rapidly to clarify and-where possible-to resolve these issues is essential.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)489-498
    Issue number6
    Early online date13 Apr 2016
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this