Tackling social media data analysis: Comparing and contrasting QSR NVivo and Leximancer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to offer insights into the ways two computer-aided qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) applications (QSR NVivo and Leximancer) can be used to analyze big, text-based, online data taken from consumer-to-consumer (C2C) social media communication. Design/methodology/approach: This study used QSR NVivo and Leximancer, to explore 200 discussion threads containing 1,796 posts from forums on an online open community and an online brand community that involved online brand advocacy (OBA). The functionality, in particular, the strengths and weaknesses of both programs are discussed. Examples of the types of analyses each program can undertake and the visual output available are also presented. Findings: This research found that, while both programs had strengths and weaknesses when working with big, text-based, online data, they complemented each other. Each contributed a different visual and evidence-based perspective; providing a more comprehensive and insightful view of the characteristics unique to OBA. Research limitations/implications: Qualitative market researchers are offered insights into the advantages and disadvantages of using two different software packages for research projects involving big social media data. The “visual-first” analysis, obtained from both programs can help researchers make sense of such data, particularly in exploratory research. Practical implications: The paper provides practical recommendations for analysts considering which programs to use when exploring big, text-based, online data. Originality/value: This paper answered a call to action for further research and demonstration of analytical programs of big, online data from social media C2C communication and makes strong suggestions about the need to examine such data in a number of ways.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)94-113
Number of pages20
JournalQualitative Market Research
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Social media
Advocacy
Communication
Software
Evidence-based
Analysts
Thread
Functionality
Disadvantage
Brand community
Qualitative data
Design methodology

Cite this

@article{8b6f478b7e4b4fb08eb0774c91b6252c,
title = "Tackling social media data analysis: Comparing and contrasting QSR NVivo and Leximancer",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper aims to offer insights into the ways two computer-aided qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) applications (QSR NVivo and Leximancer) can be used to analyze big, text-based, online data taken from consumer-to-consumer (C2C) social media communication. Design/methodology/approach: This study used QSR NVivo and Leximancer, to explore 200 discussion threads containing 1,796 posts from forums on an online open community and an online brand community that involved online brand advocacy (OBA). The functionality, in particular, the strengths and weaknesses of both programs are discussed. Examples of the types of analyses each program can undertake and the visual output available are also presented. Findings: This research found that, while both programs had strengths and weaknesses when working with big, text-based, online data, they complemented each other. Each contributed a different visual and evidence-based perspective; providing a more comprehensive and insightful view of the characteristics unique to OBA. Research limitations/implications: Qualitative market researchers are offered insights into the advantages and disadvantages of using two different software packages for research projects involving big social media data. The “visual-first” analysis, obtained from both programs can help researchers make sense of such data, particularly in exploratory research. Practical implications: The paper provides practical recommendations for analysts considering which programs to use when exploring big, text-based, online data. Originality/value: This paper answered a call to action for further research and demonstration of analytical programs of big, online data from social media C2C communication and makes strong suggestions about the need to examine such data in a number of ways.",
keywords = "Big data, CAQDAS, Leximancer, Qualitative method",
author = "Violetta Wilk and Soutar, {Geoffrey N.} and Paul Harrigan",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1108/QMR-01-2017-0021",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "94--113",
journal = "Qualitative Market Research",
issn = "1352-2752",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Limited",
number = "2",

}

Tackling social media data analysis : Comparing and contrasting QSR NVivo and Leximancer. / Wilk, Violetta; Soutar, Geoffrey N.; Harrigan, Paul.

In: Qualitative Market Research, Vol. 22, No. 2, 08.04.2019, p. 94-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tackling social media data analysis

T2 - Comparing and contrasting QSR NVivo and Leximancer

AU - Wilk, Violetta

AU - Soutar, Geoffrey N.

AU - Harrigan, Paul

PY - 2019/4/8

Y1 - 2019/4/8

N2 - Purpose: This paper aims to offer insights into the ways two computer-aided qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) applications (QSR NVivo and Leximancer) can be used to analyze big, text-based, online data taken from consumer-to-consumer (C2C) social media communication. Design/methodology/approach: This study used QSR NVivo and Leximancer, to explore 200 discussion threads containing 1,796 posts from forums on an online open community and an online brand community that involved online brand advocacy (OBA). The functionality, in particular, the strengths and weaknesses of both programs are discussed. Examples of the types of analyses each program can undertake and the visual output available are also presented. Findings: This research found that, while both programs had strengths and weaknesses when working with big, text-based, online data, they complemented each other. Each contributed a different visual and evidence-based perspective; providing a more comprehensive and insightful view of the characteristics unique to OBA. Research limitations/implications: Qualitative market researchers are offered insights into the advantages and disadvantages of using two different software packages for research projects involving big social media data. The “visual-first” analysis, obtained from both programs can help researchers make sense of such data, particularly in exploratory research. Practical implications: The paper provides practical recommendations for analysts considering which programs to use when exploring big, text-based, online data. Originality/value: This paper answered a call to action for further research and demonstration of analytical programs of big, online data from social media C2C communication and makes strong suggestions about the need to examine such data in a number of ways.

AB - Purpose: This paper aims to offer insights into the ways two computer-aided qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) applications (QSR NVivo and Leximancer) can be used to analyze big, text-based, online data taken from consumer-to-consumer (C2C) social media communication. Design/methodology/approach: This study used QSR NVivo and Leximancer, to explore 200 discussion threads containing 1,796 posts from forums on an online open community and an online brand community that involved online brand advocacy (OBA). The functionality, in particular, the strengths and weaknesses of both programs are discussed. Examples of the types of analyses each program can undertake and the visual output available are also presented. Findings: This research found that, while both programs had strengths and weaknesses when working with big, text-based, online data, they complemented each other. Each contributed a different visual and evidence-based perspective; providing a more comprehensive and insightful view of the characteristics unique to OBA. Research limitations/implications: Qualitative market researchers are offered insights into the advantages and disadvantages of using two different software packages for research projects involving big social media data. The “visual-first” analysis, obtained from both programs can help researchers make sense of such data, particularly in exploratory research. Practical implications: The paper provides practical recommendations for analysts considering which programs to use when exploring big, text-based, online data. Originality/value: This paper answered a call to action for further research and demonstration of analytical programs of big, online data from social media C2C communication and makes strong suggestions about the need to examine such data in a number of ways.

KW - Big data

KW - CAQDAS

KW - Leximancer

KW - Qualitative method

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067173023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/QMR-01-2017-0021

DO - 10.1108/QMR-01-2017-0021

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 94

EP - 113

JO - Qualitative Market Research

JF - Qualitative Market Research

SN - 1352-2752

IS - 2

ER -