Systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing mortality in restrictive and liberal haemoglobin thresholds for red cell transfusion: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews

Kevin M Trentino, Shannon L Farmer, Frank M Sanfilippo, Michael F. Leahy, James Isbister, Rhonda Mayberry, Axel Hofmann, Kevin Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There has been a significant increase in the number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials investigating thresholds for red blood cell transfusion. To systematically collate, appraise and synthesise the results of these systematic reviews and meta-analyses, we will conduct an overview of systematic reviews.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews. We will search five databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed (for prepublication, in process and non-Medline records) and Google Scholar. We will consider systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of haemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion on mortality. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts retrieved in the literature search and select studies meeting the eligibility criteria for full-text review. We will extract data onto a predefined form designed to summarise the key characteristics of each review. We will assess the methodological quality of included reviews and the quality of evidence in included reviews.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethics approval is not required for this overview as we will only analyse published literature. The findings of this study will be presented at relevant conferences and submitted for peer-review publication. The results are likely to be used by clinicians, policy makers and developers of clinical guidelines and will inform suggestions for future systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019120503.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere029828
Number of pages5
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Erythrocyte Transfusion
Hemoglobins
Randomized Controlled Trials
Mortality
Peer Review
Administrative Personnel
PubMed
Ethics
MEDLINE
Publications
Databases
Guidelines

Cite this

@article{0764bff9d05641e085a1bb66926eb67b,
title = "Systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing mortality in restrictive and liberal haemoglobin thresholds for red cell transfusion: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: There has been a significant increase in the number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials investigating thresholds for red blood cell transfusion. To systematically collate, appraise and synthesise the results of these systematic reviews and meta-analyses, we will conduct an overview of systematic reviews.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews. We will search five databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed (for prepublication, in process and non-Medline records) and Google Scholar. We will consider systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of haemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion on mortality. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts retrieved in the literature search and select studies meeting the eligibility criteria for full-text review. We will extract data onto a predefined form designed to summarise the key characteristics of each review. We will assess the methodological quality of included reviews and the quality of evidence in included reviews.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethics approval is not required for this overview as we will only analyse published literature. The findings of this study will be presented at relevant conferences and submitted for peer-review publication. The results are likely to be used by clinicians, policy makers and developers of clinical guidelines and will inform suggestions for future systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019120503.",
author = "Trentino, {Kevin M} and Farmer, {Shannon L} and Sanfilippo, {Frank M} and Leahy, {Michael F.} and James Isbister and Rhonda Mayberry and Axel Hofmann and Kevin Murray",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029828",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMJ (Open)",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing mortality in restrictive and liberal haemoglobin thresholds for red cell transfusion

T2 - protocol for an overview of systematic reviews

AU - Trentino, Kevin M

AU - Farmer, Shannon L

AU - Sanfilippo, Frank M

AU - Leahy, Michael F.

AU - Isbister, James

AU - Mayberry, Rhonda

AU - Hofmann, Axel

AU - Murray, Kevin

PY - 2019/8/24

Y1 - 2019/8/24

N2 - INTRODUCTION: There has been a significant increase in the number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials investigating thresholds for red blood cell transfusion. To systematically collate, appraise and synthesise the results of these systematic reviews and meta-analyses, we will conduct an overview of systematic reviews.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews. We will search five databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed (for prepublication, in process and non-Medline records) and Google Scholar. We will consider systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of haemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion on mortality. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts retrieved in the literature search and select studies meeting the eligibility criteria for full-text review. We will extract data onto a predefined form designed to summarise the key characteristics of each review. We will assess the methodological quality of included reviews and the quality of evidence in included reviews.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethics approval is not required for this overview as we will only analyse published literature. The findings of this study will be presented at relevant conferences and submitted for peer-review publication. The results are likely to be used by clinicians, policy makers and developers of clinical guidelines and will inform suggestions for future systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019120503.

AB - INTRODUCTION: There has been a significant increase in the number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials investigating thresholds for red blood cell transfusion. To systematically collate, appraise and synthesise the results of these systematic reviews and meta-analyses, we will conduct an overview of systematic reviews.METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews. We will search five databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed (for prepublication, in process and non-Medline records) and Google Scholar. We will consider systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of haemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion on mortality. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts retrieved in the literature search and select studies meeting the eligibility criteria for full-text review. We will extract data onto a predefined form designed to summarise the key characteristics of each review. We will assess the methodological quality of included reviews and the quality of evidence in included reviews.ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethics approval is not required for this overview as we will only analyse published literature. The findings of this study will be presented at relevant conferences and submitted for peer-review publication. The results are likely to be used by clinicians, policy makers and developers of clinical guidelines and will inform suggestions for future systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials.PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019120503.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029828

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029828

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - BMJ (Open)

JF - BMJ (Open)

SN - 2044-6055

M1 - e029828

ER -