TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic review and network meta-analysis of agomelatine for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in adult patients
AU - Hood, Sean D.
AU - Odufowora-Sita, Olatunji
AU - Briere, Jean Baptiste
AU - Lucchino, Marco
AU - Khrouf, Fatma
AU - Olewinska, Elzbieta
AU - Pierzchala, Paulina
AU - Mezghani, Marwa
AU - Nikodem, Mateusz
AU - Lévy, Pierre
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2025/3/1
Y1 - 2025/3/1
N2 - This systematic literature review aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of agomelatine versus approved medications for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adult patients. We selected randomized controlled trials on various medications used to treat GAD in adult patients. An existing systematic literature review (Kong et al., 2020) was used to identify relevant studies published before 2020. Outcomes of remission and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were analyzed, following a random-effects network meta-analysis approach. Of 25 identified studies, 20 and 22 studies were included in the network meta-analysis for studying the remission and discontinuation (due to AEs) outcomes, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the remission rate was observed between agomelatine and pregabalin [odds ratio (OR), 2.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-4.21]. For the other comparators, the results were nonsignificant; however, all the point estimates were in favor of agomelatine. Similarly, for discontinuation because of AEs, the point estimates leaned consistently toward agomelatine suggesting its higher tolerability. The probabilities of agomelatine having the highest remission rate and lowest discontinuation (due to AEs) rate were 67% and 68%, respectively. Based on its demonstrated effectiveness and tolerability, agomelatine can be considered as a drug of choice for the treatment of GAD.
AB - This systematic literature review aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of agomelatine versus approved medications for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adult patients. We selected randomized controlled trials on various medications used to treat GAD in adult patients. An existing systematic literature review (Kong et al., 2020) was used to identify relevant studies published before 2020. Outcomes of remission and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were analyzed, following a random-effects network meta-analysis approach. Of 25 identified studies, 20 and 22 studies were included in the network meta-analysis for studying the remission and discontinuation (due to AEs) outcomes, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the remission rate was observed between agomelatine and pregabalin [odds ratio (OR), 2.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-4.21]. For the other comparators, the results were nonsignificant; however, all the point estimates were in favor of agomelatine. Similarly, for discontinuation because of AEs, the point estimates leaned consistently toward agomelatine suggesting its higher tolerability. The probabilities of agomelatine having the highest remission rate and lowest discontinuation (due to AEs) rate were 67% and 68%, respectively. Based on its demonstrated effectiveness and tolerability, agomelatine can be considered as a drug of choice for the treatment of GAD.
KW - agomelatine
KW - generalized anxiety disorder
KW - network meta-analysis
KW - randomized controlled trial
KW - remission rate
KW - systematic literature review
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85217220210
U2 - 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000551
DO - 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000551
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38804215
AN - SCOPUS:85217220210
SN - 0268-1315
VL - 40
SP - 62
EP - 74
JO - International Clinical Psychopharmacology
JF - International Clinical Psychopharmacology
IS - 2
ER -