TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustainable Construction
T2 - The Embodied Carbon Impact of Infrastructures and Landscaping
AU - Butters, Chris
AU - Cheshmehzangi, Ali
AU - Bakhshoodeh, Reza
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - The climatic and environmental impact of construction works is well recognized, and in particular, the energy use and carbon emissions associated with both their production (embodied energy/carbon) and their lifetime operation (operational energy/carbon). However, the impact of site works, infrastructures, and landscaping has yet to be explored; most of the focus has been on the buildings rather than what is around and underneath them. Yet, these, especially in city contexts, are extensive. They are also both costly and carbon-intensive, involving mainly concrete and steel. Through intentionally simple examples, the carbon impact of the buildings themselves was compared to that of site works both on and below the surface, such as underground parking. These also represent major land use interventions often impacting the whole project site area. It is shown that these can constitute a considerable fraction of the total carbon footprint of construction projects. Further, this fraction is likely to increase as future buildings achieve much lower operational as well as embodied energy/carbon. This paper employs life cycle analysis tools to calculate the embodied carbon in specific case studies, with comparative evidence from the literature and a discussion of pertinent issues. Some broader issues were noted relating to building typologies, materials, and the varying significance of the infrastructures and site works in different climates. The carbon impacts of the site work need to be addressed more sustainably, irrespective of varying contexts. This perspective has implications for sustainable design as well as for urban planning.
AB - The climatic and environmental impact of construction works is well recognized, and in particular, the energy use and carbon emissions associated with both their production (embodied energy/carbon) and their lifetime operation (operational energy/carbon). However, the impact of site works, infrastructures, and landscaping has yet to be explored; most of the focus has been on the buildings rather than what is around and underneath them. Yet, these, especially in city contexts, are extensive. They are also both costly and carbon-intensive, involving mainly concrete and steel. Through intentionally simple examples, the carbon impact of the buildings themselves was compared to that of site works both on and below the surface, such as underground parking. These also represent major land use interventions often impacting the whole project site area. It is shown that these can constitute a considerable fraction of the total carbon footprint of construction projects. Further, this fraction is likely to increase as future buildings achieve much lower operational as well as embodied energy/carbon. This paper employs life cycle analysis tools to calculate the embodied carbon in specific case studies, with comparative evidence from the literature and a discussion of pertinent issues. Some broader issues were noted relating to building typologies, materials, and the varying significance of the infrastructures and site works in different climates. The carbon impacts of the site work need to be addressed more sustainably, irrespective of varying contexts. This perspective has implications for sustainable design as well as for urban planning.
KW - embodied carbon
KW - landscaping and carbon
KW - low-carbon cities
KW - low-carbon construction
KW - sustainable cities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205034640&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/urbansci8030076
DO - 10.3390/urbansci8030076
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85205034640
SN - 2413-8851
VL - 8
JO - Urban Science
JF - Urban Science
IS - 3
M1 - 76
ER -