Sublime Heterogeneities in Curriculum Frameworks

Felicity Haynes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To what extent does the construction of any curriculum framework have to contain axiological assumptions? Educators have been made aware of tacit epistemological assumptions underlying existing curricular frameworks by the continual demands for their revision. Eisner (1979, 2002) suggested that curriculum policy should be centred around imagination; economic rationalists have suggested that it be made more functional and accountable than traditional university disciplines allow for. Is it possible, as Efland (1990) suggests, to combine competing traditional ideologies of education in a complex postmodern pastiche which can nonetheless provide standards of assessment and evaluation without presuming a grand narrative? Brown (2001) suggests not. This paper examines the challenge of maintaining principled standards and recognising postmodern relativities, making particular reference to the notion of the sublime and the arts curriculum.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)769-786
JournalEducational Philosophy and Theory
Volume38
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

curriculum
Ideologies
educator
art
narrative
university
evaluation
economics
Curriculum
education
imagination
Relativity
Epistemological
Rationalist
Grand Narrative
Pastiche
Art
Ideology
Education
Educators

Cite this

Haynes, Felicity. / Sublime Heterogeneities in Curriculum Frameworks. In: Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2006 ; Vol. 38, No. 6. pp. 769-786.
@article{fb3ea253526b49a78256a25fc96ea61c,
title = "Sublime Heterogeneities in Curriculum Frameworks",
abstract = "To what extent does the construction of any curriculum framework have to contain axiological assumptions? Educators have been made aware of tacit epistemological assumptions underlying existing curricular frameworks by the continual demands for their revision. Eisner (1979, 2002) suggested that curriculum policy should be centred around imagination; economic rationalists have suggested that it be made more functional and accountable than traditional university disciplines allow for. Is it possible, as Efland (1990) suggests, to combine competing traditional ideologies of education in a complex postmodern pastiche which can nonetheless provide standards of assessment and evaluation without presuming a grand narrative? Brown (2001) suggests not. This paper examines the challenge of maintaining principled standards and recognising postmodern relativities, making particular reference to the notion of the sublime and the arts curriculum.",
author = "Felicity Haynes",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "769--786",
journal = "Educational Philosophy and Theory",
issn = "0013-1857",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Sublime Heterogeneities in Curriculum Frameworks. / Haynes, Felicity.

In: Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2006, p. 769-786.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sublime Heterogeneities in Curriculum Frameworks

AU - Haynes, Felicity

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - To what extent does the construction of any curriculum framework have to contain axiological assumptions? Educators have been made aware of tacit epistemological assumptions underlying existing curricular frameworks by the continual demands for their revision. Eisner (1979, 2002) suggested that curriculum policy should be centred around imagination; economic rationalists have suggested that it be made more functional and accountable than traditional university disciplines allow for. Is it possible, as Efland (1990) suggests, to combine competing traditional ideologies of education in a complex postmodern pastiche which can nonetheless provide standards of assessment and evaluation without presuming a grand narrative? Brown (2001) suggests not. This paper examines the challenge of maintaining principled standards and recognising postmodern relativities, making particular reference to the notion of the sublime and the arts curriculum.

AB - To what extent does the construction of any curriculum framework have to contain axiological assumptions? Educators have been made aware of tacit epistemological assumptions underlying existing curricular frameworks by the continual demands for their revision. Eisner (1979, 2002) suggested that curriculum policy should be centred around imagination; economic rationalists have suggested that it be made more functional and accountable than traditional university disciplines allow for. Is it possible, as Efland (1990) suggests, to combine competing traditional ideologies of education in a complex postmodern pastiche which can nonetheless provide standards of assessment and evaluation without presuming a grand narrative? Brown (2001) suggests not. This paper examines the challenge of maintaining principled standards and recognising postmodern relativities, making particular reference to the notion of the sublime and the arts curriculum.

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 769

EP - 786

JO - Educational Philosophy and Theory

JF - Educational Philosophy and Theory

SN - 0013-1857

IS - 6

ER -