Abstract
Cognitive acceleration programs such as Thinking Science Australia (TSA) have demonstrated cognitive gains in students
that are long-term and far-transfer. Despite evidence of their effectiveness, little empirical research has been conducted into the perspectives of the teachers who deliver and students who participate in these programs, especially with respect to the episodes of small-group activities called Construction Zone Activity (CZA). This embedded case study used qualitative data to determine the alignment between teacher and student perspectives of CZA, revealing consistency with the theoretical model and potential implications that may benefit the practice of other teachers.
that are long-term and far-transfer. Despite evidence of their effectiveness, little empirical research has been conducted into the perspectives of the teachers who deliver and students who participate in these programs, especially with respect to the episodes of small-group activities called Construction Zone Activity (CZA). This embedded case study used qualitative data to determine the alignment between teacher and student perspectives of CZA, revealing consistency with the theoretical model and potential implications that may benefit the practice of other teachers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Qualification | Masters |
Awarding Institution |
|
Supervisors/Advisors |
|
Thesis sponsors | |
Award date | 28 Nov 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Unpublished - 2017 |