Structured Decision-Making Identifies Effective Strategies and Potential Barriers for Ecosystem-Based Management of a Range-Extending Species in a Global Marine Hotspot

Lucy M. Robinson, Martin P. Marzloff, Ingrid van Putten, Gretta Pecl, Sarah Jennings, Sam Nicol, Alistair J. Hobday, Sean Tracey, Klaas Hartmann, Marcus Haward, Stewart Frusher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Climate-driven changes in ocean currents have facilitated the range extension of the long-spined sea urchin (Centrostephanus rodgersii) from Australia’s mainland to eastern Tasmania over recent decades. Since its arrival, destructive grazing by the urchin has led to widespread formation of sea urchin ‘barrens’. The loss of habitat, biodiversity and productivity for important commercial reef species in conjunction with the development of an urchin fishery has led to conflicting objectives among stakeholders, which poses complex challenges for regional management. Stakeholder representatives and managers were engaged via a participatory workshop and subsequent one-on-one surveys to trial a structured decision-making process to identify effective ecosystem-based management strategies. We directly and indirectly elicited each stakeholder’s preferences for nine alternative management strategies by presenting them with the 10-year consequences of each strategy estimated from an ecosystem model of Tasmanian reef communities. These preferences were included in cost-effectiveness scores that were averaged (across stakeholders) to enable strategy ranking from most to least cost-effective. Rankings revealed strategies that included sea urchin removal or translocation of predatory lobsters were the most cost-effective. However, assessment of stakeholders’ individual cost-effectiveness scores showed some disparity among stakeholders’ preferences in high ranking strategies. Additionally, evaluating inconsistencies within some stakeholders’ scores that included direct or indirect preferences revealed conflicting objectives and cognitive bias as the most plausible explanations for these inconsistencies. Our study illustrates how structured decision-making can effectively facilitate ecosystem-based management by engaging stakeholders step-by-step towards management strategy implementation, identifying psychological barriers to decision-making and promoting collective learning.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEcosystems
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

ecosystem management
stakeholders
Ecosystems
decision making
hot spot
stakeholder
Decision making
ecosystem
Reefs
Cost effectiveness
Echinoidea
ranking
cost effectiveness
Ocean currents
cost
Fisheries
Biodiversity
reefs
reef
Climate change

Cite this

Robinson, Lucy M. ; Marzloff, Martin P. ; van Putten, Ingrid ; Pecl, Gretta ; Jennings, Sarah ; Nicol, Sam ; Hobday, Alistair J. ; Tracey, Sean ; Hartmann, Klaas ; Haward, Marcus ; Frusher, Stewart. / Structured Decision-Making Identifies Effective Strategies and Potential Barriers for Ecosystem-Based Management of a Range-Extending Species in a Global Marine Hotspot. In: Ecosystems. 2019.
@article{0400db83d84140fb987a651eaa6ecf46,
title = "Structured Decision-Making Identifies Effective Strategies and Potential Barriers for Ecosystem-Based Management of a Range-Extending Species in a Global Marine Hotspot",
abstract = "Climate-driven changes in ocean currents have facilitated the range extension of the long-spined sea urchin (Centrostephanus rodgersii) from Australia’s mainland to eastern Tasmania over recent decades. Since its arrival, destructive grazing by the urchin has led to widespread formation of sea urchin ‘barrens’. The loss of habitat, biodiversity and productivity for important commercial reef species in conjunction with the development of an urchin fishery has led to conflicting objectives among stakeholders, which poses complex challenges for regional management. Stakeholder representatives and managers were engaged via a participatory workshop and subsequent one-on-one surveys to trial a structured decision-making process to identify effective ecosystem-based management strategies. We directly and indirectly elicited each stakeholder’s preferences for nine alternative management strategies by presenting them with the 10-year consequences of each strategy estimated from an ecosystem model of Tasmanian reef communities. These preferences were included in cost-effectiveness scores that were averaged (across stakeholders) to enable strategy ranking from most to least cost-effective. Rankings revealed strategies that included sea urchin removal or translocation of predatory lobsters were the most cost-effective. However, assessment of stakeholders’ individual cost-effectiveness scores showed some disparity among stakeholders’ preferences in high ranking strategies. Additionally, evaluating inconsistencies within some stakeholders’ scores that included direct or indirect preferences revealed conflicting objectives and cognitive bias as the most plausible explanations for these inconsistencies. Our study illustrates how structured decision-making can effectively facilitate ecosystem-based management by engaging stakeholders step-by-step towards management strategy implementation, identifying psychological barriers to decision-making and promoting collective learning.",
keywords = "decision analysis, ecosystem-based management, global marine hotspot, keystone herbivore, multi-method elicitation, species range extension, stakeholder engagement, structured decision-making",
author = "Robinson, {Lucy M.} and Marzloff, {Martin P.} and {van Putten}, Ingrid and Gretta Pecl and Sarah Jennings and Sam Nicol and Hobday, {Alistair J.} and Sean Tracey and Klaas Hartmann and Marcus Haward and Stewart Frusher",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1007/s10021-019-00358-w",
language = "English",
journal = "Ecosystems",
issn = "1432-9840",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Structured Decision-Making Identifies Effective Strategies and Potential Barriers for Ecosystem-Based Management of a Range-Extending Species in a Global Marine Hotspot. / Robinson, Lucy M.; Marzloff, Martin P.; van Putten, Ingrid; Pecl, Gretta; Jennings, Sarah; Nicol, Sam; Hobday, Alistair J.; Tracey, Sean; Hartmann, Klaas; Haward, Marcus; Frusher, Stewart.

In: Ecosystems, 29.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structured Decision-Making Identifies Effective Strategies and Potential Barriers for Ecosystem-Based Management of a Range-Extending Species in a Global Marine Hotspot

AU - Robinson, Lucy M.

AU - Marzloff, Martin P.

AU - van Putten, Ingrid

AU - Pecl, Gretta

AU - Jennings, Sarah

AU - Nicol, Sam

AU - Hobday, Alistair J.

AU - Tracey, Sean

AU - Hartmann, Klaas

AU - Haward, Marcus

AU - Frusher, Stewart

PY - 2019/3/29

Y1 - 2019/3/29

N2 - Climate-driven changes in ocean currents have facilitated the range extension of the long-spined sea urchin (Centrostephanus rodgersii) from Australia’s mainland to eastern Tasmania over recent decades. Since its arrival, destructive grazing by the urchin has led to widespread formation of sea urchin ‘barrens’. The loss of habitat, biodiversity and productivity for important commercial reef species in conjunction with the development of an urchin fishery has led to conflicting objectives among stakeholders, which poses complex challenges for regional management. Stakeholder representatives and managers were engaged via a participatory workshop and subsequent one-on-one surveys to trial a structured decision-making process to identify effective ecosystem-based management strategies. We directly and indirectly elicited each stakeholder’s preferences for nine alternative management strategies by presenting them with the 10-year consequences of each strategy estimated from an ecosystem model of Tasmanian reef communities. These preferences were included in cost-effectiveness scores that were averaged (across stakeholders) to enable strategy ranking from most to least cost-effective. Rankings revealed strategies that included sea urchin removal or translocation of predatory lobsters were the most cost-effective. However, assessment of stakeholders’ individual cost-effectiveness scores showed some disparity among stakeholders’ preferences in high ranking strategies. Additionally, evaluating inconsistencies within some stakeholders’ scores that included direct or indirect preferences revealed conflicting objectives and cognitive bias as the most plausible explanations for these inconsistencies. Our study illustrates how structured decision-making can effectively facilitate ecosystem-based management by engaging stakeholders step-by-step towards management strategy implementation, identifying psychological barriers to decision-making and promoting collective learning.

AB - Climate-driven changes in ocean currents have facilitated the range extension of the long-spined sea urchin (Centrostephanus rodgersii) from Australia’s mainland to eastern Tasmania over recent decades. Since its arrival, destructive grazing by the urchin has led to widespread formation of sea urchin ‘barrens’. The loss of habitat, biodiversity and productivity for important commercial reef species in conjunction with the development of an urchin fishery has led to conflicting objectives among stakeholders, which poses complex challenges for regional management. Stakeholder representatives and managers were engaged via a participatory workshop and subsequent one-on-one surveys to trial a structured decision-making process to identify effective ecosystem-based management strategies. We directly and indirectly elicited each stakeholder’s preferences for nine alternative management strategies by presenting them with the 10-year consequences of each strategy estimated from an ecosystem model of Tasmanian reef communities. These preferences were included in cost-effectiveness scores that were averaged (across stakeholders) to enable strategy ranking from most to least cost-effective. Rankings revealed strategies that included sea urchin removal or translocation of predatory lobsters were the most cost-effective. However, assessment of stakeholders’ individual cost-effectiveness scores showed some disparity among stakeholders’ preferences in high ranking strategies. Additionally, evaluating inconsistencies within some stakeholders’ scores that included direct or indirect preferences revealed conflicting objectives and cognitive bias as the most plausible explanations for these inconsistencies. Our study illustrates how structured decision-making can effectively facilitate ecosystem-based management by engaging stakeholders step-by-step towards management strategy implementation, identifying psychological barriers to decision-making and promoting collective learning.

KW - decision analysis

KW - ecosystem-based management

KW - global marine hotspot

KW - keystone herbivore

KW - multi-method elicitation

KW - species range extension

KW - stakeholder engagement

KW - structured decision-making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064518792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10021-019-00358-w

DO - 10.1007/s10021-019-00358-w

M3 - Article

JO - Ecosystems

JF - Ecosystems

SN - 1432-9840

ER -