Stochastic correction of carbon-14 activities: A Bayesian approach with argon-39 validation

James L. McCallum, Shawan Dogramaci, Peter G. Cook, Eddie Banks, Roland Purtschert, Michelle Irvine, Craig T. Simmons, Lawrence Burk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Carbon-14 (14C) has been measured in groundwater for over half a century and remains a widely used tool for understanding groundwater flow systems. Ultimately, the usefulness of 14C as a groundwater tracer relies on the ability to distinguish between changes in concentration due to various chemical/physical processes (e.g. chemical reactions with solid carbonate material, conditions at the water table), and changes due to ageing along flow paths, the latter being most informative of groundwater flow conditions. To this end, a number of correction methodologies have been developed to account for chemical modifications in groundwater systems. In this paper, we implement two different single sample correction models, one for closed and one for open system carbonate dissolution in conjunction with a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach at two sites; the sedimentary Port Willunga Formation Aquifer in South Australia and a fractured rock aquifer in the Hamersley Basin, northwest Australia. For comparison, we include argon-39 (39Ar) data taken from some of the wells sampled and use a mixing envelope constraint in the MCMC procedure. We found that considering all of the errors associated with 14C correction resulted in a distribution of values to consider for groundwater dating procedures. When accounting for all parameters associated with single sample correction techniques, the associated error was 10 times greater than the analytical errors. Additionally, inclusion of the 39Ar data produced mixed results, with little improvement observed in the Port Willunga Aquifer (closed system correction), and a significant improvement observed at the Hamersley site (open system). This is most likely due to the mixing caused by long screens and the sensitivity of the open system correction model. Our results highlight the importance of considering all sources of error in groundwater dating studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)396-405
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Hydrology
Volume566
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

argon
carbon isotope
groundwater
aquifer
Markov chain
groundwater flow
chemical reaction
water table
tracer
dissolution
well
carbonate
methodology
basin
rock

Cite this

McCallum, James L. ; Dogramaci, Shawan ; Cook, Peter G. ; Banks, Eddie ; Purtschert, Roland ; Irvine, Michelle ; Simmons, Craig T. ; Burk, Lawrence. / Stochastic correction of carbon-14 activities : A Bayesian approach with argon-39 validation. In: Journal of Hydrology. 2018 ; Vol. 566. pp. 396-405.
@article{45667465864e4f5785f4f4cdb65fddbb,
title = "Stochastic correction of carbon-14 activities: A Bayesian approach with argon-39 validation",
abstract = "Carbon-14 (14C) has been measured in groundwater for over half a century and remains a widely used tool for understanding groundwater flow systems. Ultimately, the usefulness of 14C as a groundwater tracer relies on the ability to distinguish between changes in concentration due to various chemical/physical processes (e.g. chemical reactions with solid carbonate material, conditions at the water table), and changes due to ageing along flow paths, the latter being most informative of groundwater flow conditions. To this end, a number of correction methodologies have been developed to account for chemical modifications in groundwater systems. In this paper, we implement two different single sample correction models, one for closed and one for open system carbonate dissolution in conjunction with a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach at two sites; the sedimentary Port Willunga Formation Aquifer in South Australia and a fractured rock aquifer in the Hamersley Basin, northwest Australia. For comparison, we include argon-39 (39Ar) data taken from some of the wells sampled and use a mixing envelope constraint in the MCMC procedure. We found that considering all of the errors associated with 14C correction resulted in a distribution of values to consider for groundwater dating procedures. When accounting for all parameters associated with single sample correction techniques, the associated error was 10 times greater than the analytical errors. Additionally, inclusion of the 39Ar data produced mixed results, with little improvement observed in the Port Willunga Aquifer (closed system correction), and a significant improvement observed at the Hamersley site (open system). This is most likely due to the mixing caused by long screens and the sensitivity of the open system correction model. Our results highlight the importance of considering all sources of error in groundwater dating studies.",
keywords = "Argon-39, Carbon-14, Correction models, Groundwater dating",
author = "McCallum, {James L.} and Shawan Dogramaci and Cook, {Peter G.} and Eddie Banks and Roland Purtschert and Michelle Irvine and Simmons, {Craig T.} and Lawrence Burk",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.047",
language = "English",
volume = "566",
pages = "396--405",
journal = "Journal of Hydrology",
issn = "0022-1694",
publisher = "Pergamon",

}

Stochastic correction of carbon-14 activities : A Bayesian approach with argon-39 validation. / McCallum, James L.; Dogramaci, Shawan; Cook, Peter G.; Banks, Eddie; Purtschert, Roland; Irvine, Michelle; Simmons, Craig T.; Burk, Lawrence.

In: Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 566, 01.11.2018, p. 396-405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stochastic correction of carbon-14 activities

T2 - A Bayesian approach with argon-39 validation

AU - McCallum, James L.

AU - Dogramaci, Shawan

AU - Cook, Peter G.

AU - Banks, Eddie

AU - Purtschert, Roland

AU - Irvine, Michelle

AU - Simmons, Craig T.

AU - Burk, Lawrence

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Carbon-14 (14C) has been measured in groundwater for over half a century and remains a widely used tool for understanding groundwater flow systems. Ultimately, the usefulness of 14C as a groundwater tracer relies on the ability to distinguish between changes in concentration due to various chemical/physical processes (e.g. chemical reactions with solid carbonate material, conditions at the water table), and changes due to ageing along flow paths, the latter being most informative of groundwater flow conditions. To this end, a number of correction methodologies have been developed to account for chemical modifications in groundwater systems. In this paper, we implement two different single sample correction models, one for closed and one for open system carbonate dissolution in conjunction with a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach at two sites; the sedimentary Port Willunga Formation Aquifer in South Australia and a fractured rock aquifer in the Hamersley Basin, northwest Australia. For comparison, we include argon-39 (39Ar) data taken from some of the wells sampled and use a mixing envelope constraint in the MCMC procedure. We found that considering all of the errors associated with 14C correction resulted in a distribution of values to consider for groundwater dating procedures. When accounting for all parameters associated with single sample correction techniques, the associated error was 10 times greater than the analytical errors. Additionally, inclusion of the 39Ar data produced mixed results, with little improvement observed in the Port Willunga Aquifer (closed system correction), and a significant improvement observed at the Hamersley site (open system). This is most likely due to the mixing caused by long screens and the sensitivity of the open system correction model. Our results highlight the importance of considering all sources of error in groundwater dating studies.

AB - Carbon-14 (14C) has been measured in groundwater for over half a century and remains a widely used tool for understanding groundwater flow systems. Ultimately, the usefulness of 14C as a groundwater tracer relies on the ability to distinguish between changes in concentration due to various chemical/physical processes (e.g. chemical reactions with solid carbonate material, conditions at the water table), and changes due to ageing along flow paths, the latter being most informative of groundwater flow conditions. To this end, a number of correction methodologies have been developed to account for chemical modifications in groundwater systems. In this paper, we implement two different single sample correction models, one for closed and one for open system carbonate dissolution in conjunction with a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach at two sites; the sedimentary Port Willunga Formation Aquifer in South Australia and a fractured rock aquifer in the Hamersley Basin, northwest Australia. For comparison, we include argon-39 (39Ar) data taken from some of the wells sampled and use a mixing envelope constraint in the MCMC procedure. We found that considering all of the errors associated with 14C correction resulted in a distribution of values to consider for groundwater dating procedures. When accounting for all parameters associated with single sample correction techniques, the associated error was 10 times greater than the analytical errors. Additionally, inclusion of the 39Ar data produced mixed results, with little improvement observed in the Port Willunga Aquifer (closed system correction), and a significant improvement observed at the Hamersley site (open system). This is most likely due to the mixing caused by long screens and the sensitivity of the open system correction model. Our results highlight the importance of considering all sources of error in groundwater dating studies.

KW - Argon-39

KW - Carbon-14

KW - Correction models

KW - Groundwater dating

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053828433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.047

DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.047

M3 - Article

VL - 566

SP - 396

EP - 405

JO - Journal of Hydrology

JF - Journal of Hydrology

SN - 0022-1694

ER -