TY - JOUR
T1 - Stimulant-conditioned locomotion is not affected by blockade of D1 and/or D2 dopamine receptors during conditioning
AU - Martin-Iverson, Mathew Thomas
AU - McManus, David John
PY - 1990/6/25
Y1 - 1990/6/25
N2 - A series of experiments were conducted to investigate the role of dopamine (DA) D1 and D2 receptor subtypes in stimulant-conditioned locomotion in rats. Expt. 1 demonstrated that locomotion could be induced by a testing situation when that situation was previously paired with (+)-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg, s.c.) or a D2 receptor selective agonist (PHNO, 15 or 30 μg/kg, s.c.), but not when the drug treatments were given 3 h after exposure to the situation. The selective D2 receptor antagonist, haloperidol (50 μg/kg, i.p.), and the D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390 (20 μg/kg, s.c.), blocked amphetamine-induced locomotion during the pairing process, but failed to block amphetamine-conditioned locomotion as assessed during a drug-free test in Expt. 2. This was true when the antagonists were given separately or together. The results of Expts. 3 and 4 showed that doses of the D1 (20 μg/kg, s.c.) and D2 antagonist (250 μg/kg, i.p.) that blocked the unconditioned locomotor effects of PHNO failed to block its conditioned locomotion. It is concluded that neither D1 nor D2 DA receptors are essential for the development of stimulant-conditioned locomotion.
AB - A series of experiments were conducted to investigate the role of dopamine (DA) D1 and D2 receptor subtypes in stimulant-conditioned locomotion in rats. Expt. 1 demonstrated that locomotion could be induced by a testing situation when that situation was previously paired with (+)-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg, s.c.) or a D2 receptor selective agonist (PHNO, 15 or 30 μg/kg, s.c.), but not when the drug treatments were given 3 h after exposure to the situation. The selective D2 receptor antagonist, haloperidol (50 μg/kg, i.p.), and the D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390 (20 μg/kg, s.c.), blocked amphetamine-induced locomotion during the pairing process, but failed to block amphetamine-conditioned locomotion as assessed during a drug-free test in Expt. 2. This was true when the antagonists were given separately or together. The results of Expts. 3 and 4 showed that doses of the D1 (20 μg/kg, s.c.) and D2 antagonist (250 μg/kg, i.p.) that blocked the unconditioned locomotor effects of PHNO failed to block its conditioned locomotion. It is concluded that neither D1 nor D2 DA receptors are essential for the development of stimulant-conditioned locomotion.
KW - (+)-4-Propyl-9-hydroxynaphthoxazine
KW - Amphetamine
KW - Conditioned locomotion
KW - D-receptor
KW - Dopamine
KW - Dopamine receptor
KW - Haloperidol
KW - Rat
KW - SCH 23390
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025284876&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91540-W
DO - 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91540-W
M3 - Article
C2 - 2145055
AN - SCOPUS:0025284876
SN - 0006-8993
VL - 521
SP - 175
EP - 184
JO - Brain Research
JF - Brain Research
IS - 1-2
ER -