Stimulant-conditioned locomotion is not affected by blockade of D1 and/or D2 dopamine receptors during conditioning

Mathew Thomas Martin-Iverson, David John McManus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A series of experiments were conducted to investigate the role of dopamine (DA) D1 and D2 receptor subtypes in stimulant-conditioned locomotion in rats. Expt. 1 demonstrated that locomotion could be induced by a testing situation when that situation was previously paired with (+)-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg, s.c.) or a D2 receptor selective agonist (PHNO, 15 or 30 μg/kg, s.c.), but not when the drug treatments were given 3 h after exposure to the situation. The selective D2 receptor antagonist, haloperidol (50 μg/kg, i.p.), and the D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390 (20 μg/kg, s.c.), blocked amphetamine-induced locomotion during the pairing process, but failed to block amphetamine-conditioned locomotion as assessed during a drug-free test in Expt. 2. This was true when the antagonists were given separately or together. The results of Expts. 3 and 4 showed that doses of the D1 (20 μg/kg, s.c.) and D2 antagonist (250 μg/kg, i.p.) that blocked the unconditioned locomotor effects of PHNO failed to block its conditioned locomotion. It is concluded that neither D1 nor D2 DA receptors are essential for the development of stimulant-conditioned locomotion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-184
Number of pages10
JournalBrain Research
Volume521
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jun 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stimulant-conditioned locomotion is not affected by blockade of D1 and/or D2 dopamine receptors during conditioning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this