Standards without standardisation? Assembling standards-based reforms in Australian and US schooling

Steven Lewis, Glenn C. Savage, Jessica Holloway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Our aim in this paper is to examine how standards-based reforms (SBRs) relating to teachers and teaching are being constituted in Australia and the US. Our focus is not the specific impacts of these policies as enacted practices in schools or teacher training institutions, but rather the dynamics of policy production, with a specific focus on how federally-driven policies have been assembled in each country. Bringing together the notion of ‘global forms’ with the dual concepts of ‘political rationality’ and ‘political technology’ from governmentality studies, we consider SBRs as a global techno-scientific form that coheres at the level of political rationality and which can be abstracted across contexts, but which also manifests in unique place-specific assemblages of political technologies. The global form of SBRs thus represents the logics by which policymakers may attempt to align and create commonality across systems in the search for standardisation, even if this can never be fully realised in practice.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Education Policy
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

reform
rationality
governmentality
teacher training
Teaching
teacher
school

Cite this

@article{2d5ee5a8caa7439f861e64c58da6648c,
title = "Standards without standardisation? Assembling standards-based reforms in Australian and US schooling",
abstract = "Our aim in this paper is to examine how standards-based reforms (SBRs) relating to teachers and teaching are being constituted in Australia and the US. Our focus is not the specific impacts of these policies as enacted practices in schools or teacher training institutions, but rather the dynamics of policy production, with a specific focus on how federally-driven policies have been assembled in each country. Bringing together the notion of ‘global forms’ with the dual concepts of ‘political rationality’ and ‘political technology’ from governmentality studies, we consider SBRs as a global techno-scientific form that coheres at the level of political rationality and which can be abstracted across contexts, but which also manifests in unique place-specific assemblages of political technologies. The global form of SBRs thus represents the logics by which policymakers may attempt to align and create commonality across systems in the search for standardisation, even if this can never be fully realised in practice.",
keywords = "global forms, governmentality, policy assemblage, policy mobilities, standards-based reforms, Teaching standards",
author = "Steven Lewis and Savage, {Glenn C.} and Jessica Holloway",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1080/02680939.2019.1636140",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Education Policy",
issn = "0268-0939",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Standards without standardisation? Assembling standards-based reforms in Australian and US schooling. / Lewis, Steven; Savage, Glenn C.; Holloway, Jessica.

In: Journal of Education Policy, 25.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standards without standardisation? Assembling standards-based reforms in Australian and US schooling

AU - Lewis, Steven

AU - Savage, Glenn C.

AU - Holloway, Jessica

PY - 2019/6/25

Y1 - 2019/6/25

N2 - Our aim in this paper is to examine how standards-based reforms (SBRs) relating to teachers and teaching are being constituted in Australia and the US. Our focus is not the specific impacts of these policies as enacted practices in schools or teacher training institutions, but rather the dynamics of policy production, with a specific focus on how federally-driven policies have been assembled in each country. Bringing together the notion of ‘global forms’ with the dual concepts of ‘political rationality’ and ‘political technology’ from governmentality studies, we consider SBRs as a global techno-scientific form that coheres at the level of political rationality and which can be abstracted across contexts, but which also manifests in unique place-specific assemblages of political technologies. The global form of SBRs thus represents the logics by which policymakers may attempt to align and create commonality across systems in the search for standardisation, even if this can never be fully realised in practice.

AB - Our aim in this paper is to examine how standards-based reforms (SBRs) relating to teachers and teaching are being constituted in Australia and the US. Our focus is not the specific impacts of these policies as enacted practices in schools or teacher training institutions, but rather the dynamics of policy production, with a specific focus on how federally-driven policies have been assembled in each country. Bringing together the notion of ‘global forms’ with the dual concepts of ‘political rationality’ and ‘political technology’ from governmentality studies, we consider SBRs as a global techno-scientific form that coheres at the level of political rationality and which can be abstracted across contexts, but which also manifests in unique place-specific assemblages of political technologies. The global form of SBRs thus represents the logics by which policymakers may attempt to align and create commonality across systems in the search for standardisation, even if this can never be fully realised in practice.

KW - global forms

KW - governmentality

KW - policy assemblage

KW - policy mobilities

KW - standards-based reforms

KW - Teaching standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068125233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02680939.2019.1636140

DO - 10.1080/02680939.2019.1636140

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Education Policy

JF - Journal of Education Policy

SN - 0268-0939

ER -