TY - JOUR
T1 - Staff perceptions of family access and visitation policies in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units
T2 - The WELCOME-ICU survey
AU - The Welcome ICU contributors
AU - Bailey, Rachel L.
AU - Ramanan, Mahesh
AU - Litton, Edward
AU - Yan Kai, Nathalie Ssi
AU - Coyer, Fiona M.
AU - Garrouste-Orgeas, Maite
AU - Tabah, Alexis
AU - Doyle, Elizabeth
AU - Yarad, Elizabeth
AU - Masters, Kirsty
AU - McGlion, Elaine
AU - Bonnici, Kim
AU - Hartley, Amy
AU - Butcher, Rand
AU - Hanger, Gail
AU - Badawi, Nadia
AU - McClintock, Abby
AU - Hallam, Joanne
AU - Waite, Chris
AU - Tom, Sheena
AU - Townsend, Cath
AU - Sane, Sunil
AU - Stanley, Mandy
AU - Bhadange, Neeraj
AU - Smith, Judy
AU - Soar, Natalie
AU - Hillard, Phillipa
AU - Bone, Allison
AU - Cossar, Sue
AU - Dennett, Jenny
AU - Spiller, Shakira
AU - O'Donnell, Amanda
AU - Topping, Tor
AU - Palermo, Annamaria
AU - Lawrence, Kim
AU - Ferrier, Janet
AU - Colica, Sandra
AU - Waterson, Sharon
AU - Slattery, Emer
AU - Campbell, Lewis
AU - Young, Paul
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Background: Family-centred critical care recognises the impact of a loved one's critical illness on his relatives. Open visiting is a strategy to improve family satisfaction and psychological outcomes by permitting unrestricted or less restricted access to visit their family member in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, increased family presence may result in increased workload and a risk of burnout for ICU staff. Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate ICU staff perceptions regarding visiting hours and family access in Australian and New Zealand ICUs. Secondary outcomes included an evaluation of current visiting policies, witnessed events in ICUs, and barriers to implementing open visiting policies. Design: A web-based survey open to all healthcare workers in Australia and New Zealand ICUs was distributed through local, state-based, and national critical care networks. Open visiting was defined as ICUs open for visiting >14 h per day. Main results: We received 1255 valid responses. Most respondents were nurses (n = 930, 74.1%) with a median critical care experience of 10 y. Most worked in open visiting ICUs (n = 749, 59.7%). Reported visiting hours varied greatly with a median of 20 h per day (interquartile range: 10–24 h). Open visiting was perceived as beneficial for the relatives, but less so for patients and staff (relatives: n = 845, 67.3%, patients: n = 561, 44.7%, staff: n = 257, 20.5%, p < 0.0001). Respondents from closed visiting units and nurses identified more risks from open visiting than other professional groups. Generally, staff preferred not to change from their current practice. Conclusion: We report that staff perceived open visiting as beneficial for relatives, but also identified risks to themselves, including increased workload, a risk of burnout, and a risk of occupational violence. Reluctance to change highlights the importance of addressing staff perceptions when implementing an open visiting policy.
AB - Background: Family-centred critical care recognises the impact of a loved one's critical illness on his relatives. Open visiting is a strategy to improve family satisfaction and psychological outcomes by permitting unrestricted or less restricted access to visit their family member in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, increased family presence may result in increased workload and a risk of burnout for ICU staff. Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate ICU staff perceptions regarding visiting hours and family access in Australian and New Zealand ICUs. Secondary outcomes included an evaluation of current visiting policies, witnessed events in ICUs, and barriers to implementing open visiting policies. Design: A web-based survey open to all healthcare workers in Australia and New Zealand ICUs was distributed through local, state-based, and national critical care networks. Open visiting was defined as ICUs open for visiting >14 h per day. Main results: We received 1255 valid responses. Most respondents were nurses (n = 930, 74.1%) with a median critical care experience of 10 y. Most worked in open visiting ICUs (n = 749, 59.7%). Reported visiting hours varied greatly with a median of 20 h per day (interquartile range: 10–24 h). Open visiting was perceived as beneficial for the relatives, but less so for patients and staff (relatives: n = 845, 67.3%, patients: n = 561, 44.7%, staff: n = 257, 20.5%, p < 0.0001). Respondents from closed visiting units and nurses identified more risks from open visiting than other professional groups. Generally, staff preferred not to change from their current practice. Conclusion: We report that staff perceived open visiting as beneficial for relatives, but also identified risks to themselves, including increased workload, a risk of burnout, and a risk of occupational violence. Reluctance to change highlights the importance of addressing staff perceptions when implementing an open visiting policy.
KW - Family nursing
KW - Healthcare workers
KW - Intensive care
KW - Visiting hours
KW - Visiting policies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111801020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.06.014
DO - 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.06.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 34456125
AN - SCOPUS:85111801020
SN - 1036-7314
VL - 35
SP - 383
EP - 390
JO - Australian Critical Care
JF - Australian Critical Care
IS - 4
ER -