TY - JOUR
T1 - Species turnover does not rescue biodiversity in fragmented landscapes
AU - Goncalves-Souza, Thiago
AU - Chase, Jonathan M.
AU - Haddad, Nick M.
AU - Vancine, Mauricio H.
AU - Didham, Raphael K.
AU - Melo, Felipe L. P.
AU - Aizen, Marcelo A.
AU - Bernard, Enrico
AU - Chiarello, Adriano G.
AU - Faria, Deborah
AU - Gibb, Heloise
AU - de Lima, Marcelo G.
AU - Magnago, Luiz F. S.
AU - Mariano-Neto, Eduardo
AU - Nogueira, Andre A.
AU - Nemesio, Andre
AU - Passamani, Marcelo
AU - Pinho, Bruno X.
AU - Rocha-Santos, Larissa
AU - Rodrigues, Rodolpho C.
AU - Safar, Nathalia Vieira Hissa
AU - Santos, Braulio A.
AU - Soto-Werschitz, Alejandra
AU - Tabarelli, Marcelo
AU - Uehara-Prado, Marcio
AU - Vasconcelos, Heraldo L.
AU - Vieira, Simone
AU - Sanders, Nathan J.
PY - 2025/4/17
Y1 - 2025/4/17
N2 - Habitat fragmentation generally reduces biodiversity at the patch scale (alpha diversity)1. However, there is ongoing debate about whether such negative effects can be alleviated at the landscape scale (gamma diversity) if among-patch diversity (beta diversity) increases as a result of fragmentation 2, 3, 4, 5-6. This controversial view has not been rigorously tested. Here we use a dataset of 4,006 taxa across 37 studies from 6 continents to test the effects of fragmentation on biodiversity across scales by explicitly comparing continuous and fragmented landscapes. We find that fragmented landscapes consistently have both lower alpha diversity and lower gamma diversity. Although fragmented landscapes did tend to have higher beta diversity, this did not translate into higher gamma diversity. Our findings refute claims that habitat fragmentation can increase biodiversity at landscape scales, and emphasize the need to restore habitat and increase connectivity to minimize biodiversity loss at ever-increasing scales.
AB - Habitat fragmentation generally reduces biodiversity at the patch scale (alpha diversity)1. However, there is ongoing debate about whether such negative effects can be alleviated at the landscape scale (gamma diversity) if among-patch diversity (beta diversity) increases as a result of fragmentation 2, 3, 4, 5-6. This controversial view has not been rigorously tested. Here we use a dataset of 4,006 taxa across 37 studies from 6 continents to test the effects of fragmentation on biodiversity across scales by explicitly comparing continuous and fragmented landscapes. We find that fragmented landscapes consistently have both lower alpha diversity and lower gamma diversity. Although fragmented landscapes did tend to have higher beta diversity, this did not translate into higher gamma diversity. Our findings refute claims that habitat fragmentation can increase biodiversity at landscape scales, and emphasize the need to restore habitat and increase connectivity to minimize biodiversity loss at ever-increasing scales.
KW - Habitat amount hypothesis
KW - Beta-diversity
KW - Atlantic forest
KW - Responses
KW - Patterns
KW - Extrapolation
KW - Connectivity
KW - Biogeography
KW - Rarefaction
KW - Richness
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=uwapure5-25&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001443567300001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1038/s41586-025-08688-7
DO - 10.1038/s41586-025-08688-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 40074894
SN - 0028-0836
VL - 640
SP - 702
EP - 706
JO - Nature
JF - Nature
IS - 8059
M1 - eaax3100
ER -