Species turnover does not rescue biodiversity in fragmented landscapes

Thiago Goncalves-Souza, Jonathan M. Chase, Nick M. Haddad, Mauricio H. Vancine, Raphael K. Didham, Felipe L. P. Melo, Marcelo A. Aizen, Enrico Bernard, Adriano G. Chiarello, Deborah Faria, Heloise Gibb, Marcelo G. de Lima, Luiz F. S. Magnago, Eduardo Mariano-Neto, Andre A. Nogueira, Andre Nemesio, Marcelo Passamani, Bruno X. Pinho, Larissa Rocha-Santos, Rodolpho C. RodriguesNathalia Vieira Hissa Safar, Braulio A. Santos, Alejandra Soto-Werschitz, Marcelo Tabarelli, Marcio Uehara-Prado, Heraldo L. Vasconcelos, Simone Vieira, Nathan J. Sanders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Habitat fragmentation generally reduces biodiversity at the patch scale (alpha diversity)1. However, there is ongoing debate about whether such negative effects can be alleviated at the landscape scale (gamma diversity) if among-patch diversity (beta diversity) increases as a result of fragmentation 2, 3, 4, 5-6. This controversial view has not been rigorously tested. Here we use a dataset of 4,006 taxa across 37 studies from 6 continents to test the effects of fragmentation on biodiversity across scales by explicitly comparing continuous and fragmented landscapes. We find that fragmented landscapes consistently have both lower alpha diversity and lower gamma diversity. Although fragmented landscapes did tend to have higher beta diversity, this did not translate into higher gamma diversity. Our findings refute claims that habitat fragmentation can increase biodiversity at landscape scales, and emphasize the need to restore habitat and increase connectivity to minimize biodiversity loss at ever-increasing scales.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbereaax3100
Pages (from-to)702-706
Number of pages5
JournalNature
Volume640
Issue number8059
Early online date12 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Apr 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Species turnover does not rescue biodiversity in fragmented landscapes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this