Spaced Out and Down By Law : Geography, Politics and the Ethics of Homelessness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the introduction to Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain, Proctorclaims that ‘there is a strong resonance among all the essays [in the edited volume] as to thegeographical embeddedness of ethics, an argument made implicitly or explicitly that geographymatters in finding clarifications of, or solutions to, ethical questions’. There is no doubt thatgeography, broadly enough construed, can function so as to clarify not only ethical questions butpolitical, social and legal ones as well. While not denying that geographical considerations ofvarious kinds have contributed to discussions about vagrancy, the meaning and use of publicspace, public welfare in relation to urban development, race and class relations and the like,I shall argue that geographical considerations by themselves have little relevance to the questionof the morality of the growing legislation of what has come to be known as anti-vagrant or antihomelessnesslaws. Discussions on the relationship between facts and values have advancedconsiderably since Hume’s infamous is–ought distinction, and the interplay of facts and valueshas been increasingly asserted in contexts far removed from that invoked by Hume. Whileconsiderations of fact and value cannot be neatly separated in many cases, I discuss two essays inwhich geographers make little, if any, case for a connection and show little awareness that a casedoes have to be made—that facts, even when nicely described, do not by themselves speak value.Geography is then contrasted with architecture with regard to the issue of the embeddedness ofethics in these fields. It has recently been argued that in architecture there is no clear separationbetween ethical issues and architectural or design problems. Ethics, it is claimed, is intrinsic to(embedded in) the practice of architecture, but extrinsic to most other disciplines—includinggeography.Introduction:
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-112
JournalEthics, Place and Environment
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

homelessness
ethics
vagrancy
politics
moral philosophy
geography
Law
Values
morality
urban development
legislation
welfare
Homelessness
Geography

Cite this

@article{45d4bae78d484ddfbdeaa1b6fe8556a2,
title = "Spaced Out and Down By Law : Geography, Politics and the Ethics of Homelessness",
abstract = "In the introduction to Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain, Proctorclaims that ‘there is a strong resonance among all the essays [in the edited volume] as to thegeographical embeddedness of ethics, an argument made implicitly or explicitly that geographymatters in finding clarifications of, or solutions to, ethical questions’. There is no doubt thatgeography, broadly enough construed, can function so as to clarify not only ethical questions butpolitical, social and legal ones as well. While not denying that geographical considerations ofvarious kinds have contributed to discussions about vagrancy, the meaning and use of publicspace, public welfare in relation to urban development, race and class relations and the like,I shall argue that geographical considerations by themselves have little relevance to the questionof the morality of the growing legislation of what has come to be known as anti-vagrant or antihomelessnesslaws. Discussions on the relationship between facts and values have advancedconsiderably since Hume’s infamous is–ought distinction, and the interplay of facts and valueshas been increasingly asserted in contexts far removed from that invoked by Hume. Whileconsiderations of fact and value cannot be neatly separated in many cases, I discuss two essays inwhich geographers make little, if any, case for a connection and show little awareness that a casedoes have to be made—that facts, even when nicely described, do not by themselves speak value.Geography is then contrasted with architecture with regard to the issue of the embeddedness ofethics in these fields. It has recently been argued that in architecture there is no clear separationbetween ethical issues and architectural or design problems. Ethics, it is claimed, is intrinsic to(embedded in) the practice of architecture, but extrinsic to most other disciplines—includinggeography.Introduction:",
author = "Michael Levine",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/13668790802048407",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "91--112",
journal = "Ethics, Place and Environment",
issn = "2155-0085",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Spaced Out and Down By Law : Geography, Politics and the Ethics of Homelessness. / Levine, Michael.

In: Ethics, Place and Environment, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2008, p. 91-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spaced Out and Down By Law : Geography, Politics and the Ethics of Homelessness

AU - Levine, Michael

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - In the introduction to Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain, Proctorclaims that ‘there is a strong resonance among all the essays [in the edited volume] as to thegeographical embeddedness of ethics, an argument made implicitly or explicitly that geographymatters in finding clarifications of, or solutions to, ethical questions’. There is no doubt thatgeography, broadly enough construed, can function so as to clarify not only ethical questions butpolitical, social and legal ones as well. While not denying that geographical considerations ofvarious kinds have contributed to discussions about vagrancy, the meaning and use of publicspace, public welfare in relation to urban development, race and class relations and the like,I shall argue that geographical considerations by themselves have little relevance to the questionof the morality of the growing legislation of what has come to be known as anti-vagrant or antihomelessnesslaws. Discussions on the relationship between facts and values have advancedconsiderably since Hume’s infamous is–ought distinction, and the interplay of facts and valueshas been increasingly asserted in contexts far removed from that invoked by Hume. Whileconsiderations of fact and value cannot be neatly separated in many cases, I discuss two essays inwhich geographers make little, if any, case for a connection and show little awareness that a casedoes have to be made—that facts, even when nicely described, do not by themselves speak value.Geography is then contrasted with architecture with regard to the issue of the embeddedness ofethics in these fields. It has recently been argued that in architecture there is no clear separationbetween ethical issues and architectural or design problems. Ethics, it is claimed, is intrinsic to(embedded in) the practice of architecture, but extrinsic to most other disciplines—includinggeography.Introduction:

AB - In the introduction to Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain, Proctorclaims that ‘there is a strong resonance among all the essays [in the edited volume] as to thegeographical embeddedness of ethics, an argument made implicitly or explicitly that geographymatters in finding clarifications of, or solutions to, ethical questions’. There is no doubt thatgeography, broadly enough construed, can function so as to clarify not only ethical questions butpolitical, social and legal ones as well. While not denying that geographical considerations ofvarious kinds have contributed to discussions about vagrancy, the meaning and use of publicspace, public welfare in relation to urban development, race and class relations and the like,I shall argue that geographical considerations by themselves have little relevance to the questionof the morality of the growing legislation of what has come to be known as anti-vagrant or antihomelessnesslaws. Discussions on the relationship between facts and values have advancedconsiderably since Hume’s infamous is–ought distinction, and the interplay of facts and valueshas been increasingly asserted in contexts far removed from that invoked by Hume. Whileconsiderations of fact and value cannot be neatly separated in many cases, I discuss two essays inwhich geographers make little, if any, case for a connection and show little awareness that a casedoes have to be made—that facts, even when nicely described, do not by themselves speak value.Geography is then contrasted with architecture with regard to the issue of the embeddedness ofethics in these fields. It has recently been argued that in architecture there is no clear separationbetween ethical issues and architectural or design problems. Ethics, it is claimed, is intrinsic to(embedded in) the practice of architecture, but extrinsic to most other disciplines—includinggeography.Introduction:

U2 - 10.1080/13668790802048407

DO - 10.1080/13668790802048407

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 91

EP - 112

JO - Ethics, Place and Environment

JF - Ethics, Place and Environment

SN - 2155-0085

IS - 1

ER -