Socio-ecological predictors of the uptake of cycling for recreation and transport in adults: Results from the RESIDE study

H.M. Badland, Matthew Knuiman, Paula Hooper, Billie Giles-Corti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the uptake of cycling for recreation and transport, and relate these behaviors to individual, social, and environmental exposures over time. Method: Data were drawn from 909 adults in Time 2 (T2) (2005-2006) and Time 3 (T3) (2007-2008) of the RESIDE study (Australia). Demographics, perceptions of self-efficacy and social support related to cycling, neighborhood environment perceptions, and objective measures of the neighborhood were measured at T2. These were compared with uptake of cycling for recreation and transport at T3. Results: At T3, 54 (5.9%) had taken up cycling for recreation and 44 (4.8%) for transport. Positive perceptions of self-efficacy at T2 were consistently positively associated with the uptake of cycling for either purpose at T3. Respondents living in higher walkable neighborhoods (OR=1.63; 95% CI=1.02-2.62) or with higher objectively measured street connectivity (OR=1.80; 95% CI=1.05-3.07) were more likely to start cycling for recreation when compared with their reference groups. No significant relationships existed between objective measures of the neighborhood and uptake of cycling for transport. Conclusion: Interventions focusing on enhancing self-efficacy and generating social support will likely positively influence both cycling for recreation and transport; and providing infrastructure that creates physically supportive neighborhoods may increase cycling levels. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)396-399
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume57
Issue number4
Early online date20 Jun 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Recreation
Self Efficacy
Social Support
Environmental Exposure
Demography

Cite this

@article{faa0fb0e93d8460380226127ee07b2f3,
title = "Socio-ecological predictors of the uptake of cycling for recreation and transport in adults: Results from the RESIDE study",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the uptake of cycling for recreation and transport, and relate these behaviors to individual, social, and environmental exposures over time. Method: Data were drawn from 909 adults in Time 2 (T2) (2005-2006) and Time 3 (T3) (2007-2008) of the RESIDE study (Australia). Demographics, perceptions of self-efficacy and social support related to cycling, neighborhood environment perceptions, and objective measures of the neighborhood were measured at T2. These were compared with uptake of cycling for recreation and transport at T3. Results: At T3, 54 (5.9{\%}) had taken up cycling for recreation and 44 (4.8{\%}) for transport. Positive perceptions of self-efficacy at T2 were consistently positively associated with the uptake of cycling for either purpose at T3. Respondents living in higher walkable neighborhoods (OR=1.63; 95{\%} CI=1.02-2.62) or with higher objectively measured street connectivity (OR=1.80; 95{\%} CI=1.05-3.07) were more likely to start cycling for recreation when compared with their reference groups. No significant relationships existed between objective measures of the neighborhood and uptake of cycling for transport. Conclusion: Interventions focusing on enhancing self-efficacy and generating social support will likely positively influence both cycling for recreation and transport; and providing infrastructure that creates physically supportive neighborhoods may increase cycling levels. {\circledC} 2013 Elsevier Inc.",
author = "H.M. Badland and Matthew Knuiman and Paula Hooper and Billie Giles-Corti",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.015",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "396--399",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press",
number = "4",

}

Socio-ecological predictors of the uptake of cycling for recreation and transport in adults: Results from the RESIDE study. / Badland, H.M.; Knuiman, Matthew; Hooper, Paula; Giles-Corti, Billie.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 57, No. 4, 10.2013, p. 396-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socio-ecological predictors of the uptake of cycling for recreation and transport in adults: Results from the RESIDE study

AU - Badland, H.M.

AU - Knuiman, Matthew

AU - Hooper, Paula

AU - Giles-Corti, Billie

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Objective: To examine the uptake of cycling for recreation and transport, and relate these behaviors to individual, social, and environmental exposures over time. Method: Data were drawn from 909 adults in Time 2 (T2) (2005-2006) and Time 3 (T3) (2007-2008) of the RESIDE study (Australia). Demographics, perceptions of self-efficacy and social support related to cycling, neighborhood environment perceptions, and objective measures of the neighborhood were measured at T2. These were compared with uptake of cycling for recreation and transport at T3. Results: At T3, 54 (5.9%) had taken up cycling for recreation and 44 (4.8%) for transport. Positive perceptions of self-efficacy at T2 were consistently positively associated with the uptake of cycling for either purpose at T3. Respondents living in higher walkable neighborhoods (OR=1.63; 95% CI=1.02-2.62) or with higher objectively measured street connectivity (OR=1.80; 95% CI=1.05-3.07) were more likely to start cycling for recreation when compared with their reference groups. No significant relationships existed between objective measures of the neighborhood and uptake of cycling for transport. Conclusion: Interventions focusing on enhancing self-efficacy and generating social support will likely positively influence both cycling for recreation and transport; and providing infrastructure that creates physically supportive neighborhoods may increase cycling levels. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.

AB - Objective: To examine the uptake of cycling for recreation and transport, and relate these behaviors to individual, social, and environmental exposures over time. Method: Data were drawn from 909 adults in Time 2 (T2) (2005-2006) and Time 3 (T3) (2007-2008) of the RESIDE study (Australia). Demographics, perceptions of self-efficacy and social support related to cycling, neighborhood environment perceptions, and objective measures of the neighborhood were measured at T2. These were compared with uptake of cycling for recreation and transport at T3. Results: At T3, 54 (5.9%) had taken up cycling for recreation and 44 (4.8%) for transport. Positive perceptions of self-efficacy at T2 were consistently positively associated with the uptake of cycling for either purpose at T3. Respondents living in higher walkable neighborhoods (OR=1.63; 95% CI=1.02-2.62) or with higher objectively measured street connectivity (OR=1.80; 95% CI=1.05-3.07) were more likely to start cycling for recreation when compared with their reference groups. No significant relationships existed between objective measures of the neighborhood and uptake of cycling for transport. Conclusion: Interventions focusing on enhancing self-efficacy and generating social support will likely positively influence both cycling for recreation and transport; and providing infrastructure that creates physically supportive neighborhoods may increase cycling levels. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.015

DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.015

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 396

EP - 399

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

IS - 4

ER -